I think Najee Harris is in play.

Solar7

Go Suns
Joined
May 18, 2002
Posts
11,172
Reaction score
12,108
Location
Las Vegas, NV
So what you are saying is that we could possibly have a top 5 or 10 back for the next four years as Kyler is entering his prime playing in a mercenary league of free agency? Well, I am totally cool with that :)
Seriously! This and next year are our window under this GM and HC. "Building for the future" is rebuild territory, mostly.
 

PACardsFan

ASFN Icon
Joined
May 15, 2002
Posts
10,250
Reaction score
12,215
Location
York, PA
Posts like this is confusing to me when other posts (at least one), says he brings size, speed, and vision. Which is it? Speed or no speed?
So, to you, what is too slow? (I don't know his pro day numbers and how they compare) . :)

Edit :
Sorry, I posted before I saw your answer to PACardsFan.
I’ve read where he has run a 4.41. When you’re 6’2 & 230 lbs, that’s hardly slow. Reggie Bush called Harris a more athletic version of Derrick Henry. Cardinals have NEVER had anyone like Harris before.
 

GatorAZ

feed hopkins
Joined
Oct 17, 2011
Posts
25,440
Reaction score
18,326
Location
The Giant Toaster
F

Fwiw, Richardson failed because of the person he was, not the player he was.

T-Rich was one of the surest things coming out I can remember but dude got fat and quit. He was amazing in college.

xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
 

Jetstream Green

Kool Aid with a touch of vodka
Joined
Feb 5, 2003
Posts
29,476
Reaction score
16,649
Location
San Antonio, Texas
I’ve read where he has run a 4.41. When you’re 6’2 & 230 lbs, that’s hardly slow. Reggie Bush called Harris a more athletic version of Derrick Henry. Cardinals have NEVER had anyone like Harris before.

The current Cardinals, no... but OJ Anderson says hello :)
 

PACardsFan

ASFN Icon
Joined
May 15, 2002
Posts
10,250
Reaction score
12,215
Location
York, PA
The current Cardinals, no... but OJ Anderson says hello :)
Yes, Ottis was a beast for 5-6 seasons. And like Harris, he could catch the ball out of the backfield too. Both men were 6'2". Hard to believe that Harris is 10 lbs heavier, as OJ seemed monstrous. I think it was the humongous shoulder pads that he wore. A very good comparison though & I would LOVE to have that kind of weapon again!
 

QuebecCard

ASFN Addict
Joined
Mar 12, 2021
Posts
5,880
Reaction score
8,310
Location
North of the 49th.
With our head coach who is technically the offense of coordinators it seems rather easy actually

Coordinators say that it takes a College QB two years to learn an offence and add a year to understand the tendencies of NFL defences. KM, who had 17 starts at UNI, is on record pace after two seasons under the tutelage of you know who.
 

slanidrac16

ASFN Icon
Supporting Member
Joined
Jul 11, 2002
Posts
15,610
Reaction score
15,928
Location
Plainfield, Il.
I want a quality player with the first pick and one that can contribute right now. If we add Harris the rb room suddenly looks like a strength. If Harris was faster he would never get to 16.

I like a home run hitter. That being said I don’t think Harris fills that bill. He is a back that’s going to get better as the game wears on. He will need 20 carries a game but I don’t think he’ll get that in this offense and that scares me.

I think Connor fills the short yardage “ slower” guy opposite of Edmonds. Entiene might be more of what Kingsbury would like.

please note I’m not saying we should draft Entiene ( at 16 ), But this offense is never going to turn into the Titans offense where they give it to Henry 25 times. That’s where The value of Harris is diminished.

I think Harris is going to be pretty darn good. But unless Kingsbury is prepared to use him as the featured back, which I don’t think he will, he will not have the impact we are hoping for.
 

Gandhi

Hall of Famer
Joined
Feb 17, 2007
Posts
2,018
Reaction score
2,866
Location
Denmark
If Keim takes a runningback in the first round I will consider it his biggest draft blunder ever. With every other first round selection there has at least been some reason to it, but wasting a first round pick on a runningback, when you can easily find productive ones later on?

I have 14 players with first round grades overall, including eight I would be fine with the Cards selecting, and absolutely no runningback are close to either one.
 

Stout

Hold onto the ball, Murray!
Joined
Dec 30, 2002
Posts
39,747
Reaction score
23,900
Location
Pittsburgh, PA--Enemy territory!
If Keim takes a runningback in the first round I will consider it his biggest draft blunder ever. With every other first round selection there has at least been some reason to it, but wasting a first round pick on a runningback, when you can easily find productive ones later on?

I have 14 players with first round grades overall, including eight I would be fine with the Cards selecting, and absolutely no runningback are close to either one.

False. You CAN find productive ones later. Easily don't enter into it.
 

Solar7

Go Suns
Joined
May 18, 2002
Posts
11,172
Reaction score
12,108
Location
Las Vegas, NV
If Keim takes a runningback in the first round I will consider it his biggest draft blunder ever. With every other first round selection there has at least been some reason to it, but wasting a first round pick on a runningback, when you can easily find productive ones later on?

I have 14 players with first round grades overall, including eight I would be fine with the Cards selecting, and absolutely no runningback are close to either one.
The numbers don't really support this claim, unless you mean rounds 2 and 3. And well... we only have one of those picks. 5th and beyond you have a very low chance of even getting a guy who will start 5 games in his career for you. (The past 5 years say that's a 17% chance. For 5 games.)
 

QuebecCard

ASFN Addict
Joined
Mar 12, 2021
Posts
5,880
Reaction score
8,310
Location
North of the 49th.
I want a quality player with the first pick and one that can contribute right now. If we add Harris the rb room suddenly looks like a strength. If Harris was faster he would never get to 16.

I like a home run hitter. That being said I don’t think Harris fills that bill. He is a back that’s going to get better as the game wears on. He will need 20 carries a game but I don’t think he’ll get that in this offense and that scares me.

I think Connor fills the short yardage “ slower” guy opposite of Edmonds. Entiene might be more of what Kingsbury would like.

please note I’m not saying we should draft Entiene ( at 16 ), But this offense is never going to turn into the Titans offense where they give it to Henry 25 times. That’s where The value of Harris is diminished.

I think Harris is going to be pretty darn good. But unless Kingsbury is prepared to use him as the featured back, which I don’t think he will, he will not have the impact we are hoping for.

ETIENNE.
 

Chopper0080

2021 - Prove It
Joined
May 15, 2002
Posts
28,283
Reaction score
40,299
Location
Colorado
I don't know which excites me less, a RB or an ILB. But, whatever.

If it is a RB, Etienne is my #3 option behind Williams and Harris. From what we have seen from our offense the ability to find the hole or hit the cutback quickly and break tackles is more important than pass catching.

In terms of LB, I guess Collins makes sense if we want to put him on the edge and have a EDGE player who has more experience dropping into coverage than rushing off the edge...I can't believe I just wrote that. I think Collins can stick but we are again drafting a player to be used in a different role than he was in college. A unique concept would be to draft a more natural pass rusher to be a pass rusher but what do I know.

Maybe it is all for naught and we take one of the big 9 (if you add in the Slim Reaper, Devonta Smith). Normally I am out on WRs in round 1, but I would actually like to see our 4 wide concepts being used ala Buffalo last year and that requires WRs. Hell, we may even have enough line talent to do it.
 

SECTION 11

vibraslap
Joined
Oct 11, 2002
Posts
16,371
Reaction score
4,808
Location
Between the Pipes
If Keim takes a runningback in the first round I will consider it his biggest draft blunder ever. With every other first round selection there has at least been some reason to it, but wasting a first round pick on a runningback, when you can easily find productive ones later on?

I have 14 players with first round grades overall, including eight I would be fine with the Cards selecting, and absolutely no runningback are close to either one.

The easily find one later on bit is just flat out wrong. Does it happen yes, is it easy no.
 

Gandhi

Hall of Famer
Joined
Feb 17, 2007
Posts
2,018
Reaction score
2,866
Location
Denmark
The numbers don't really support this claim, unless you mean rounds 2 and 3. And well... we only have one of those picks. 5th and beyond you have a very low chance of even getting a guy who will start 5 games in his career for you. (The past 5 years say that's a 17% chance. For 5 games.)

I don’t know, Solar. All four statistics, efficiency, rush yards over expected, rush yard over expected per attempt and rush percentage over expected according to NextGen stats has nine out of the top 15 runningbacks drafted after the second round. And the minority of them were drafted in the third round.
 

Solar7

Go Suns
Joined
May 18, 2002
Posts
11,172
Reaction score
12,108
Location
Las Vegas, NV
I don’t know, Solar. All four statistics, efficiency, rush yards over expected, rush yard over expected per attempt and rush percentage over expected according to NextGen stats has nine out of the top 15 runningbacks drafted after the second round. And the minority of them were drafted in the third round.
So... the second round?

Honestly, not sure how much I need to repost it, as I've posted it in multiple threads, but without the major outliers of Jordan Howard, Aaron Jones, and Chris Carson, RB picks after the 4th round are a complete wasteland of production. Teams aren't finding all of these late round gems you guys seem to think they are. Once you get past the 3rd round, production starts to fall off a cliff.
 
Top