kerouac9
Klowned by Keim
Purgatory as @DVontel has seemed to define it is anywhere between winning more than 5.5 games in a season and making a Conference Championship game. So I'm using his broad definition to define success here.What's your measure of success here? You have Eagles and Ravens in the good side but they haven't won anything. Neither have the Niners.
But you have Steelers in the bad side with their no losing seasons in 20 years and consistent playoff appearances. Also Tampa, who built a great roster and parachuted Brady in to win a SB.
The line seems all over the place.
You can argue that the most successful teams of the past 5 years built good rosters and then dropped in the quarterback to get them over. Chiefs, Eagles, Bucs, Niners and Rams. The only consistently good team I can think of that drafted in a rookie QB in the last 5 years and became constant challengers in their division and next to automatic playoff team because of that QB is the Bengals with Burrow.
This is a simplistic view of course, there are other factors like coaching but I think it's easy to argue there is no single way to do it and the situation we find ourselves in with Kyler's contract rather ties our hands.
You should add Buffalo to your list of successful teams over the past five years, boyo. Josh Allen didn't arrive with much. Probably drop Miami in there, too.
I'm a Tomlin and Steelers fan, but they've made the playoffs twice in the past six seasons and haven't won a playoff game since 2016.
The Rams were in the Super Bowl three years before they won it, and had a young QB in Goff who they built around after going 4-12. They were 43-21 before Stafford arrived.