RugbyMuffin
ASFN IDOL
- Joined
- Apr 30, 2003
- Posts
- 30,485
- Reaction score
- 4,877
Start a thread. Maybe we’ll see you in mid October ...or maybe we won’t.Can we name it "What to do once reality sets in" ?
I don't know much about the guy, but if I have to hear on KTAR one more time about how attractive he is and how women love him, I'm gonna hurl. Give it a rest, already. Sheesh!
Everyone is entitled to their opinion. I try not to pin my hopes on what others (spurrier, etc) have done in the past. KK’s calling card certainly seems to be offense and bro’ing with the players. I’m good with both of those. I just think Taylor would have been an excellent choice (and likely a similar gamble) as KK. Both have pluses and minuses. It depends upon where each fan places the greatest importance.Agreed its an exaggeration on my part perhaps. But also saying Taylor is much better choice only because he has coached in the NFL is not a fact. (Not saying that what you said so no need for the "words matter" reply )
In that case, Wilks would have been a better hire over Chip Kelly when he came out because he was under a coach who had some success in the NFL . . Who would you take? Wilks right? Well who was more successful?
KK actually being a HC is being vastly underated on this board. I know its NFL vs NCAA but being a HC and a QB coach are two different worlds.
This totally makes sense.The Cards were speaking to Kingsbury about the potential OC job. Then they realized after he took the USC OC job, that the only way they could get him was if they hired him as a HC.
Thumbs up!here's what i do REALLY like about Kliff... that apparently throughout his career, his offenses have not only been very good to great, he's been able to ADAPT to the players he's had on the field. That a big deal for any great HC... the ability to CHANGE his "system" and not be rigid.
Agreed its an exaggeration on my part perhaps. But also saying Taylor is much better choice only because he has coached in the NFL is not a fact. (Not saying that what you said so no need for the "words matter" reply )
Ageed. The word should be Zac Taylor is a more qualified for the job. Better choice would be more of a matter of opinion. But, more experience would say you are better qualified on paper.
And at least 2 more quality WRs & oh yeah an Oline that can keep from getting Rosen’s back waxed almost every play or even seriously hurt.We have our Offensive minded coach that will bring a wide open offense to the Cards. Also I think he will do a great job with Rosen and that's the main thing. All we need now is a really good DC.
He's a fan, not a beat writer.
Says right at the bottom of the piece.
I can see an argument being made that at least Kingsbury has been a HC, but the idea that people completely dismiss Taylor as out of hand and heads and tails below Kingsbury just seems like myopic Cardinals Kool-Aid. If he had been the choice, the same people slamming him as completely out of Kingsbury's lead would be jumping up and down excited about him saying he's exactly in the same mold as McVay.
Me personally? I would be happy with either. I just don't see Taylor as a better candidate only because he has coached in the NFL. Thats my argument exactly, I prefer KK because he HAS been a HC. Plus I have actually been able to see his scheme and offensive play calling in action. How do we know what type of play calling or scheme Taylor would run. Mcvays? We dont there's no sample. He has never even called plays!
Having an opinion is great. But ppl crapping all over the hire, and the best anyone can come up with is Taylor or Caldwell is horse****
if there's good arguments for both, I just don't know why the people that are gung-ho are flying off the handle at anyone who challenges the Kingsbury hire and calling other's opinion horse-####? The people aren't crapping on YOU. Don't see the reason why you and some others have decided to do the same to posters.
I am not a fan of the coach being a bro to the players.KK’s calling card certainly seems to be offense and bro’ing with the players. I’m good with both of those.
Can't emphasis this enough.Just needs to surround himself with professional and competent staff.
I am not a fan of the coach being a bro to the players.
There is a professional line that shouldn't be crossed.
Just like at work. It's business. I am friendly with some of the subcontractors that work with and for me, but we keep business separate. It's a respect issue with me. JMO