where I disagree is she HAS been accountable. In fact she publicly apologized for her actions before he did. She also readily admitted and told the truth that she had made the first physical contact not him.
Well, admittingly I didn't know this much. However, she still hasn't been held criminally liable. Under your rationale, am I to assume that had Mixon been initially forthright, he wouldnt/shouldnt have been charged with criminal crimes either?
She publicly apologized, and admitted she made the first contact with him. He may have initially lied/embellished/had not been forthright about the events (and lets be fair, sometimes we remember hearing or seeing things that just didn't quite happen during stressful moments; I know I have been guilty with an honest heart of it), but otherwise he publicly admitted to striking her, publicly apologized, and paid up through civil action.
Yet, we are seemingly ok with her actions, but still insistent on keeping a foot over his head. He paid the price (criminally, civilly, and through the NCAA), and it still isn't good enough. She gets exonerated of all of her culpability because she issued a public apology. I don't see this any other way but sexist.
I continue to stand by my points on the issue.