Josh Apologists...

Pariah

H.S.
Supporting Member
Joined
Feb 3, 2003
Posts
35,345
Reaction score
18
Location
The Aventine
john h said:
All McCown did is lob the ball up in the air. The receivers made the plays. No accuracy involved.
Exactly. Literally ANY healthy QB in the NFL could have made those passes.

Josh had his ups and downs today. I was happy to see him have the confidence in Q and Fitz to let go of those passes, but they weren't exactly shining examples of stellar quarterbacking.
 

john h

Registered User
LEGACY MEMBER
Joined
Sep 24, 2002
Posts
10,552
Reaction score
13
Location
Little Rock
WisconsinCard said:
Well all he did was give us a chance to win. I guess we should see if king wants to start the last game.

I could care less about the other QB's today as it was McCown who was out there and anyway you look at it he stunk. He should have had about 5 interceptions. His TD's were just lobs that the receivers made great catches on. If Dennis Green keeps this guy as a starter next year he will get what he deserves. McCown hass basically started a full seasons worth of games and he looks like a backup at the very best. If he does not get it by now he never will. Believe what you see. We will probably be drafting in the #5 slot.
 

john h

Registered User
LEGACY MEMBER
Joined
Sep 24, 2002
Posts
10,552
Reaction score
13
Location
Little Rock
Red Dawn said:
Face it, hes the best we have so we play him. Whats the use of bashing him if he's the best we have. Its a long off-season, plenty of time for that.

If Starks makes the tackle instead of trying a strip on Dilfer Josh gets another chance.

We bash him because some people seem to think he is the QB of the future and they post such. He may be the best we got but that is not good enough.
 

WisconsinCard

Herfin BIg Time
Joined
Apr 1, 2003
Posts
16,109
Reaction score
8,167
Location
In A Cigar Bar Near You
john h said:
All McCown did is lob the ball up in the air. The receivers made the plays. No accuracy involved.


Yea well before everyone was critizing him for not going deep now he does and any QB can do that. Face some like him some don't. Those who like him will find reason to like him. Those who don't will find reason to not.
 

Pariah

H.S.
Supporting Member
Joined
Feb 3, 2003
Posts
35,345
Reaction score
18
Location
The Aventine
WisconsinCard said:
Yea well before everyone was critizing him for not going deep now he does and any QB can do that. Face some like him some don't. Those who like him will find reason to like him. Those who don't will find reason to not.
Actually, I don't dislike him. I WANT to find a reason to like him as a starter for the AZ Cardinals, but I can't. Not when we're heading into an offseason where we can make some improvements at the position.
 

john h

Registered User
LEGACY MEMBER
Joined
Sep 24, 2002
Posts
10,552
Reaction score
13
Location
Little Rock
Red Dawn said:
Face it, hes the best we have so we play him. Whats the use of bashing him if he's the best we have. Its a long off-season, plenty of time for that.

If Starks makes the tackle instead of trying a strip on Dilfer Josh gets another chance.

We lost that is reason enough for me.
 

Shane

Comin for you!
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
69,461
Reaction score
40,045
Location
Las Vegas
Pariah said:
Actually, I don't dislike him. I WANT to find a reason to like him as a starter for the AZ Cardinals, but I can't. Not when we're heading into an offseason where we can make some improvements at the position.

Do you think grooming another rookie is an upgrade?
 

Pariah

H.S.
Supporting Member
Joined
Feb 3, 2003
Posts
35,345
Reaction score
18
Location
The Aventine
Shane H said:
Do you think grooming another rookie is an upgrade?
No, not immediately (although I thought grooming a rookie, either Ebn or Eli, this year would have been). But, I do think Kitna, beldsoe or Johnson are upgrades.

I'd like our starter to be one of those guys with Josh in off the bench followed by Navarre.
 

conraddobler

I want my 2$
Joined
Sep 1, 2002
Posts
20,052
Reaction score
237
Pariah said:
Actually, I don't dislike him. I WANT to find a reason to like him as a starter for the AZ Cardinals, but I can't. Not when we're heading into an offseason where we can make some improvements at the position.


I really don't understand the whole debate about the guy in the first place. I don't see how we could be any less patient with him than Dennis Green will be.

He's not going to get any free rides. I don't see why people are so afraid we will just go with him we won't.

He's not going to be the only option he might not even be a option for us. It seems that cooler, more experienced heads will not flush more than one season down the drain on the guy.

I think we will sign a reasonably high profile FA QB and make them the starter and Josh may stay as the backup but if not then DG will feel whoever is behind Josh is capable of starting and I expect will play if he falters.
 

Shane

Comin for you!
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
69,461
Reaction score
40,045
Location
Las Vegas
Pariah said:
No, not immediately (although I thought grooming a rookie, either Ebn or Eli, this year would have been). But, I do think Kitna, beldsoe or Johnson are upgrades.

Bledsoe isnt available. DO you really think that Kitna could lead this team? Johnson is awfully old.
 

Codeofhammurabi

Cards Fan Since 1971
Joined
Jun 19, 2004
Posts
641
Reaction score
0
dogpoo32 said:
Yeah! Its Josh's fault there is no run game too!
I think this is the entire teams #1 problem. Whether it be the backs, line, or both.:cards:
 

Pariah

H.S.
Supporting Member
Joined
Feb 3, 2003
Posts
35,345
Reaction score
18
Location
The Aventine
Shane H said:
Bledsoe isnt available. DO you really think that Kitna could lead this team? Johnson is awfully old.
I think Bledsoe will be available as will Johnson. Kitna most certainly could lead this team--do you think he couldn't?
 

Shane

Comin for you!
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
69,461
Reaction score
40,045
Location
Las Vegas
Pariah said:
I think Bledsoe will be available as will Johnson. Kitna most certainly could lead this team--do you think he couldn't?

Even with Kitnas performance last year I am no fan of his!
 

conraddobler

I want my 2$
Joined
Sep 1, 2002
Posts
20,052
Reaction score
237
Pariah said:
I think Bledsoe will be available as will Johnson. Kitna most certainly could lead this team--do you think he couldn't?

IMO Kitna would not be an upgrade over Josh.

A decent O line and a killer RB and Bledsoe most certainly would be. I hope he's available but heck that team is on fire.
 

D-Dogg

A Whole New World
Supporting Member
Joined
Sep 10, 2003
Posts
44,982
Reaction score
1,059
Location
In The End Zone
conraddobler said:
I really don't understand the whole debate about the guy in the first place. I don't see how we could be any less patient with him than Dennis Green will be.

He's not going to get any free rides. I don't see why people are so afraid we will just go with him we won't.

He's not going to be the only option he might not even be a option for us. It seems that cooler, more experienced heads will not flush more than one season down the drain on the guy.

I think we will sign a reasonably high profile FA QB and make them the starter and Josh may stay as the backup but if not then DG will feel whoever is behind Josh is capable of starting and I expect will play if he falters.


http://www.arizonasportsfans.com/vb/showthread.php?t=44692

It's that prevailing mindset in the link above that causes the debate about him.
 

Pariah

H.S.
Supporting Member
Joined
Feb 3, 2003
Posts
35,345
Reaction score
18
Location
The Aventine
Shane H said:
Even with Kitnas performance last year I am no fan of his!
Fair enough--now imagine if he had a year like McCowns how much you'd like him.
 

wierwolf

Koolaid Guzzler
Joined
Mar 22, 2003
Posts
1,025
Reaction score
0
Location
Gainesville, FL
conraddobler said:
IMO Kitna would not be an upgrade over Josh.

A decent O line and a killer RB and Bledsoe most certainly would be. I hope he's available but heck that team is on fire.

Any QB with a decent Oline and a killer RB would be good. We need some blocking fair and square. Bledsoe sucked until he got some blocking. Last year he had no blocking period. Or any WR's besides moulds. And he sucked. This year is different. Josh will be fine with a decent O-line. Give Green a chance to make the right changes.
 

football karma

Michael snuggles the cap space
Joined
Jul 22, 2002
Posts
15,291
Reaction score
14,397
Josh isnt the reason this game wasnt won--

cant run, cant stop the run. Given the two teams rushing stats, this game shouldnt have been close.

ANY Qb short of Farve or Manning would have had similiar stats to McCown today given the pathetic run game.
 

40yearfan

DEFENSE!!!!
Supporting Member
Joined
Feb 2, 2003
Posts
35,013
Reaction score
456
Location
Phoenix, AZ.
Check this out:

Brett Favre - 1st. full year - 1992
3227 Yards - 18 TD's - 13 INT's

Brett Favre - 2nd. full year 1993
3303 Yards - 19 TD's - 24 INT's.

He was actually in his third fullseason before he became the QB we know and love today. In 1991, he started only 2 games, so I didn't quote his stats from that season.

What say we at least give Josh one full season before we bury him?
 

ajcardfan

I see you.
Supporting Member
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
38,889
Reaction score
26,256
en fuego said:
Josh isnt the reason this game wasnt won--

cant run, cant stop the run. Given the two teams rushing stats, this game shouldnt have been close.

ANY Qb short of Farve or Manning would have had similiar stats to McCown today given the pathetic run game.


His mistakes played a role, just like everyone else's did. This loss should not be pinned on one guy, every phase of the game had a blunder. Josh's fumbles, sacks and INTs hurt too, but he wasn't the only reason for the loss, not at all.
 

BigRedMO

Registered
Joined
Apr 16, 2004
Posts
1,250
Reaction score
12
Seattle was totaly inept early in the game. A couple scoring drives would have destroyed their confidence and put them in a deep hole. A lack of consistent drives gave Seattle time to regroup. The Cardinals needs good consistent play at QB. McCown aint it. Try watching some other games and see what QBs can do with WRs less good than the Cardinals. Watching the Cardinals too long lowers your expectancy of what a QB and an offense should be able to do.

23rd in passing offense does not cut it after the investment that has been made at WR the last two years. I said in July going into the season without a viable alternative in case MCcown did not cut it would be a disaster. Overall this team was much better than I expected. With a servicable QB this team could have won the West.
 
Last edited:

Crimson Warrior

Dangerous Murray Zealot
Joined
Oct 27, 2002
Posts
8,341
Reaction score
9,778
Location
Home of the Thunder
swd1974 said:
Yup always the defenses fault. Nothing to do with the fact they are on the field twice as much with the offense in the great 3 and out formation.

Thats just flat out not true.

TOP was 32:32 to 27:28 in favor of the cards.

Ask yourself, swd, which was the greater problem for the cardinals offense today, the passing game or the running game?

Emmitt had 65 yards on 23 carries. Thats pathetic (sorry emmitt!). He looks for the cut back almost EVERY SINGLE TIME, and he is too slow at this point to get to the hole.

Alexander, on the other had, shredded our defense for 154 yards.

I'm not saying that Josh played great today, but we lost because we couldn't run, and we couldn't stop the run. Its just that simple. If you want to try to pin it on Josh, go ahead. But it won't change the truth.
 

football karma

Michael snuggles the cap space
Joined
Jul 22, 2002
Posts
15,291
Reaction score
14,397
The Cardinals did not run the football, nor stop the run.

As a result, to win the games where this occurs, they need absolutely perfect play from the QB position.

I think its unreasonable to expect any qb, much less a first year starter, to play perfectly, and when he doesnt, to place the blame for the game at his feet.

No QB the team could realistically expect to bring in here next year will perform any better than McCown has unless the problem of the running game and the running defense is addressed.
 

AzCards21

Registered User
BANNED BY MODERATORS
Banned from P+R
Joined
Jul 24, 2002
Posts
18,054
Reaction score
61
Location
What?
Anyone attempting to pin this loss solely on Josh is a moron.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
556,090
Posts
5,432,537
Members
6,329
Latest member
cardinals2025
Top