Just curious, is this just your opinion or do you have reasons that DRC would be a good fit in the new system..
Because the bottom line is Horten has said the defense we will be running with be blitz predicated and often leave the two CBs on an island as the last line of defense...
What was DRCs two biggest weaknesses?
1. Can't tackle,
2.concerned way more about the occasional INT than actually defending and keeping the play in front of him...
Unless he completly changed his game and attiude it very well could have be disasteres, and DRC is a good player and in certain schemes he is a vauable asset, but not in the system we will be running...
I don't see a scerenio where it could have worked...
Do you?
That's exactly the scenario where DRC would excel. In man coverage on an island. Where he sucked was in off man coverage where he was expected to diagnose passing lanes in three-deep looks. Combine that with the general hopelessness of the team whenever the opposition got up by more than 7 points and I'm not sure that you can gauge anything on anyone's play in 2010 except that the linebackers were terrible.
DRC was part of the solution, not part of the problem. We just jettisoned one of the four best players on our team, along with a high draft pick. Kolb better be one of the top 12 quarterbacks in the NFL
this year just justify that deal.
Rookies havent "done anything in this league" either. And we'd be staring at grabbing one if we didnt go after Kolb. You have to take this chance in order to get a QB. I think you might be romanticizing the QB play last year; it was god awful. I like the chance they took to get better. And make no mistake, QB play will determine their wins and losses, not a CB. Regardless of good everyone thinks he is.
The Cassel comparison is bunk. Cassel, well, sucks. He was proven that he isnt very good. One 'system' year in NE and he has been terrible in KC.
Fact is if he does well and leads the Cards to the playoffs no one will remember what it took to get him. If he sucks then it wont matter what they gave up. He just sucks!
If we didn't go after Kolb we'd have Hasselbeck (or his moral equivalent), Skelton with another year under his belt, and maybe a rookie first round QB who hasn't proven anything in the NFL, and one of the top 12 corners in football. We go after Kolb, and we don't have a top cornerback, and we still have a QB who hasn't proven anything in the NFL, for twice the price of a high first round QB, minus a second-round pick in 2012.
No one is romanticizing QB play last year. My POV all along has been that with even average QB play, this is probably a 7 to 9 win team. Do you need to give up a near-elite player at a premium position in the NFL (cornerback is right alongside left tackle at premium positions, behind quarterback and pass rusher)? If Kolb doesn't play like Warner, and we're losing games 35-24 instead of 42-7, is that all it takes to make this trade a success for you?
So this is a win-win scenario for the Cards? If Kolb sucks then nothing ventured, nothing gained, but if he's average then... what?
I guess it was Matt Cassel's crappiness that had him passing for 3100 yards with 27 TDs and 7 INTs in 2010. That 93.3 QB rating was craptacular.