A couple points on this.
Kyler being mid doesn't prevent Daniels from being a better QB.
Daniels being able to be successful despite a mid roster doesn't mean Kyler can't be more successful than he currently is with a better roster around him.
Those are both mutually exclusive things.
Now, if people are saying Kyler is better than Daniels, ok, you would have a point. I don't see other posters, other than maybe 6024, saying that Kyler is better than Daniels.
That's not my point at all.
My point is that we don't need a better roster to be a successful team (See Commanders) we just need a better QB.
We could spend a hundred million in cap space trying to build a roster good enough to offset how bad Kyler can be when it gets to the crunch, or we could just accept he's bad and move on.
The second option seems cheaper and easier.