Found this :
Suns Lakers Game 19. January 2015 full game Online http://bit.ly/1GplPR6
If anyone missed the game ...
Suns Lakers Game 19. January 2015 full game Online http://bit.ly/1GplPR6
If anyone missed the game ...
Last night is not representative of the entire season and I am sick and tired of people singling out Bledsoe for every mistake when overall he has done a very good job.
Just like a few games ago when someone complained on Bledsoe's first turnover by saying "how many turnovers is that already for Bledsoe?"
It is absolutely annoying, there is obviously strong bias against Bledsoe and pro Dragic here, regardless of how they actually play.
Bledsoe 5.9 apg 3.3topg ~ 1.8 assists per turnover
Dragic 4.1apg 2.1topg ~ 1.9 assists per turnover
A month ago Bledsoe was ahead on this, not to mention Bledsoe is much more aggressive attacking the basket averaging 5.2 FTA per game compared to Dragic (2.6) which obviously makes it more likely to turn it over than taking a jumpshot.
Yet we hear consistent criticising of Bledsoe but not Dragic. Bledsoe has among the best 4th quarter stats and clutch FG% along with Markieff Morris, while Dragic is nowhere to be found. Yet we only read complains when they miss late but nobody questions when Dragic bricks a crucial shots.
When Bledsoe plays his cards for a new contract he gets hated on. When Dragic openly flirts on every occasion with exploring all opportunities (something Bledsoe never actually did, he never visited another team or even flirted with them) and his upcoming free agency, again nobody cares.
I wonder if Wright will eventually supplant Len as the starter going forward.
Wright: 24 mins, 2 pts, 2 blocks, 5 rebounds
Len: 19 mins: 6 pts, 3 blocks, 6 rebounds
Last night is not representative of the entire season and I am sick and tired of people singling out Bledsoe for every mistake when overall he has done a very good job.
Just like a few games ago when someone complained on Bledsoe's first turnover by saying "how many turnovers is that already for Bledsoe?"
It is absolutely annoying, there is obviously strong bias against Bledsoe and pro Dragic here, regardless of how they actually play.
Bledsoe 5.9 apg 3.3topg ~ 1.8 assists per turnover
Dragic 4.1apg 2.1topg ~ 1.9 assists per turnover
A month ago Bledsoe was ahead on this, not to mention Bledsoe is much more aggressive attacking the basket averaging 5.2 FTA per game compared to Dragic (2.6) which obviously makes it more likely to turn it over than taking a jumpshot.
Yet we hear consistent criticising of Bledsoe but not Dragic. Bledsoe has among the best 4th quarter stats and clutch FG% along with Markieff Morris, while Dragic is nowhere to be found. Yet we only read complains when they miss late but nobody questions when Dragic bricks a crucial shots.
When Bledsoe plays his cards for a new contract he gets hated on. When Dragic openly flirts on every occasion with exploring all opportunities (something Bledsoe never actually did, he never visited another team or even flirted with them) and his upcoming free agency, again nobody cares.
His contract is far from a MAX contract. Maybe you should compare him to other "max contracts" like Gordon Hayward.
1. Bledsoe's contract is not even going to be close to a max contract when the new TV deal comes in.
2. Bledsoe did not sign the contract based on what he currently is but what his value can be.
Who is your source on what "everyone in the game felt to be totally fair"? If he was not restricted he would have gotten more even.
The fact is that Bledsoe did not visit any other team.
Yep... it's not max. He wanted max money and came pretty darn close to getting it.
As for the comments about him getting more if he weren't restricted... Uh... Ok... Maybe... Maybe not... Conjecture at best.
And frankly, I'm not concerned with how much some other teams might have paid him. I'm just hoping he grows into the guard he believes he is/or is capable of becoming. Right now, there seems to be (at least to me) a wide gap between his performance on the court and the level of play he thinks he can achieve.
His contract is far from a MAX contract. Maybe you should compare him to other "max contracts" like Gordon Hayward.
1. Bledsoe's contract is not even going to be close to a max contract when the new TV deal comes in.
2. Bledsoe did not sign the contract based on what he currently is but what his value can be.
Who is your source on what "everyone in the game felt to be totally fair"? If he was not restricted he would have gotten more even.
The fact is that Bledsoe did not visit any other team.
There's a gap, I don't think it's anywhere near as huge as your occasional game thread comments make it seem to be. If he were shooting at the level he was last year, I'd be thrilled with his performance. It's never going to be perfect and making 14 million a year isn't going to change that.
Steve
I don't see that happening. Every minute Len plays is an investment in our future.
But it is great to have Wright on board. He brings a lot to the table.
Bosh: $118 million
Anthony: $96 million
Griffin: $78 million
Wall: $78 million
George: $71 million
I think it's quite debatable that Bledsoe - presently, belongs on that list...
EDIT: Missed Irving at $72 million guaranteed...
Yea I certainly don't want that to happen but seems odd that Wright got more playing time than Len.
Hornacek was on the radio this morning and said they limited his minutes because of some soreness issues with his foot and a touch of tendinitis.
Hornacek was on the radio this morning and said they limited his minutes because of some soreness issues with his foot and a touch of tendinitis.
Damn sure hope foot stuff aren't coming up again for Len.
Hornacek said its typical to get this type of soreness after having the surgery Len had, and then playing the minutes he's been playing. He said if it were up to Len, he would never come out and that it's the coaches and trainers who are now trying to give him rest...
I'm totally okay with that. Len, more then any other player on the team, is the future.
I am hoping for that. But it is hardly a given that his health will allow him to grow into 36 minutes per game from start to finish.I'm totally okay with that. Len, more then any other player on the team, is the future.
I am hoping for that. But it is hardly a given that his health will allow him to grow into 36 minutes per game from start to finish.
I am hoping for that. But it is hardly a given that his health will allow him to grow into 36 minutes per game from start to finish.
Len saying that he'd rather stay on the court the whole game and it's the coach and trainers looking out for his health and limiting his minutes is a good sign of his character, work ethic, and ceiling. With how he's playing this season it finally makes sense why there was talk of him going #1 overall in 2013. His health is a concern but he seems to be the type of player who strives to work through injuries and come back improved rather than other players who milk it and never reach their potential or return to previous form. We have one of the most highly regarded training staffs in the league, I don't worry too much about long term problems with him. I'm less concerned with his ankles and feet than Amare's knee trouble. Other than Yao I can't think of anyone else who has their career cut short or ended due to similar issues, sure Bill Walton never quite returned to form but that was in the late 70's and he changed his game to still be an effective player.
Unfortunately that's true although we don't really need 36 minutes from him. In today's game, that's a lot of minutes for a true big man. I'll be happy if he can consistently give us 30 minutes a game but his health might put that to the test too.
Steve
I don't remember the specifics but Rik Smits and the big Washington center come to mind.
Steve
Smits played 12 years and 867 out of 984 games averaging 26 mpg. He retired in 2000 and he was a solid center but not great compared to the big men during that time like Robinson, Olajuwon, Ewing, Shaq, Mourning, and more that I'm forgetting. By the time he retired he was 33 and the game was starting to change to more of the Iverson, Carter, Kobe, McGrady perimeter ISO style. The Washington center I think you're referring to is Gheorghe Muresan who was 7'7" and didn't have much in terms of basketball skills or IQ. If Len has a career like Smit's he'll go down as the best Suns center ever and could be a solid piece to a contender. I don't think he'll ever be the #1 player on a title team but he could be the #2 or #3. With advances in medicine and the way he plays if he can be productive and relatively healthy for 12 years I think he'll have a far better career than Smit's had.