Ouchie-Z-Clown
I'm better than Mulli!
I’m now convinced it’s slin.
Slin,
You obviously haven't seen a single game. Now go hug your Chriss teddy bear and look at your Chriss poster, and leave us on this board alone so we can have civilized discussions.
You want civilized discussion yet looking at your post history 50% or more of your Suns posts are nothing other than bashing Chriss at every opportunity and talk up Bender.
It is at least in a sense consistent with your past schemes of bashing on athletic players (Amare, Bledsoe, Chriss) you claim have no bbiq while bascially getting erect at every mention of a European NBA player or draft prospect (Dragic, Hezonja, Bender etc)
Just tell me more how the guy averaging 5.2ppg 2.3rpg 0.7apg on 34%FG in 20.8mpg over the last 11 games (December) earned the right to start
https://www.basketball-reference.com/players/b/bendedr01/gamelog/2018#67-77-sum:pgl_basic
Chriss is averaging 5.9ppg 4.2rpg 1.1apg on 40.7%FG in 20.1mpg over the same stretch.
Bender is making a huge difference in non-stat areas. His defense and floor spacing is excellent.Defense, attitude, effort, what the team looks like when he is on the floor. Don't get me wrong, Bender is not tearing it up out there. It's more about Chriss being god-awful than about Bender being amazing. I know you don't watch games, but Chriss looks terrible out there. His body language is awful, his attitude is horrific, his effort is non-existent, as is his defense.
Markkanen is shooting 41% from the Field and 32% from 3!
Chriss shot 44% and 35% from 3 as a rookie. It is clear that Chriss is the biggest loser from the lack of PG play that the Suns have.
Their rebounding% is close to within a percent.
See my point, verify what you write. You are still blinded by Lauris first 10 games.
Bender is making a huge difference in non-stat areas. His defense and floor spacing is excellent.
If we put both of them up for trade, we would have people beating our door down for Bender, there would be crickets chirping in the Chriss corner.
The only reason why people claim Bender has a basketball IQ is because he is a white Euro player. It is 100% based on prejudice.
No stats can possibly support that argument whatsoever.
Bender has a 6% assist rate and 8% rebounding rate. That is god awful. And a 15.5% Turnover rate.
You must be registered for see images attach
It is laughable how the supposed IQ player is a worse passer and turns the ball over more than someone who supposedly has the lowest basketball IQ in the league.
How do you explain that?
Man. I just don't get your evaluation of Bender. It's like we are looking at two completely different people. Of course, if he were 6-7 or shorter he would not be nearly as valuable. But he is 7-1. If Marc Gasol were 6-7 or shorter, he might not make a college roster.I think that's completely incorrect, although obviously there's no way to know.
Bender has the right attitude but a deficit of physical talent. Floor spacing is not a talent. Even height and mobility aren't talents. "Basketball IQ," if indeed Bender has that, isn't a talent either. My proof of that is that many posters on this board seem to have high basketball IQs, but they are miles short of being NBA players. Having a notion of how to get into the right place at the right time, or recognizing opportunities for team offensive play, are fairly straightforward intellectual skills. The talent is being able to combine those intellectual skills with world-class athletic ability.
Chriss, in his best moments, looks like a much better player than Bender in his best moments. Admittedly, Chriss's best moments have been absent from this season. The challenge for Chriss is getting his head into the game mentally and learning how to see the game from outside his own narrow perspective. Maybe he'll never get that. But his physical tools are far, far beyond Bender's.
Neither player would be in the league if not for his height, but the reasons are different. In Chriss's case, it would be because there are too many other players who are better. In Bender's case, he would have utterly no conceivable role on an NBA team if he were 6' 7" or shorter.
Bender is making a huge difference in non-stat areas. His defense and floor spacing is excellent.
Let me put it this way. If we put both of them up for trade, we would have people beating our door down for Bender, there would be crickets chirping in the Chriss corner.
This an interesting take. I hadn’t thought about this being transition-related. But it makes sense. Makes coaching so much more important to his development.I have to say it always amazes me when people who get banned come back under a new name. First off does it ever work, do people ever not figure out who it is? And secondly, why is a message board so important to people if they get banned they have to register under a new name to come back and argue more?
I like Chriss but as I've said before it's because I saw him play in HS, I saw him before his growth spurt, so he's someone I followed a bit as he came up so I'm pulling for him more than anything.
his issue has always been he's a guard who suddenly found himself in a PF's body and he's completely relearning how to play now because he's not a guard anymore. Both at UW, and in the NBA his problem is he loves to dunk and block shots, but he doesn't seem to like to bang or do the dirty work required of a 4, he wants to still be a guard. Last year was somewhat a lost year for him because of the coaching situation, he played but he really didn't get a ton of development because Watson was in over his head.
He's talented but he's a very young and raw player. I actually agree with some a week or 2 in the G league might do him wonders letting him play more minutes and experience some success again to get his confidence back.
To be honest I don’t think anyone would be beating down our door for either.Bender is making a huge difference in non-stat areas. His defense and floor spacing is excellent.
Let me put it this way. If we put both of them up for trade, we would have people beating our door down for Bender, there would be crickets chirping in the Chriss corner.
I have to agree. I like Bender a lot more than Chriss, but I think the safe thing to say is that if both were put up for trade, we would probably get more inquiries for Bender than for Chriss. But nobody would be beating down the door for them.a HUGE difference and teams would be beating down our door for him?
Come on guys... gotta have some objectivity on this forum to have real conversations.
Man. I just don't get your evaluation of Bender. It's like we are looking at two completely different people. Of course, if he were 6-7 or shorter he would not be nearly as valuable. But he is 7-1. If Marc Gasol were 6-7 or shorter, he might not make a college roster.
To be honest I don’t think anyone would be beating down our door for either.
Exactly. And we are starved for talent.if they were on another team, I wouldn't beat down anyone's door for them