- Joined
- May 14, 2002
- Posts
- 87,495
- Reaction score
- 38,744
wallyburger said:Wanna bet? Rumor is Del Rio is pulling a Bellichek and will start Garrard. Leftwich is still hurt.
But if he were healthy he'd be starting.
wallyburger said:Wanna bet? Rumor is Del Rio is pulling a Bellichek and will start Garrard. Leftwich is still hurt.
moklerman said:And they would have a lot less money under the cap and wouldn't have an opportunity at a 1st round round difference maker somewhere else on the field. Or a second round pick or whatever it would take to get Leinart.
Just like Eli, Leinart wouldn't be anything resembling a value for the Cardinals. Switching draft spots and giving up another plus the huge contract he would commmand as well as possibly holding out untilt he huge contract is negotiated...man, I just don't see how this looks attractive.
Ask Bledsoe how much that means. Or Trent Green or Joe Montana or Tommy Maddox.But if he were healthy he'd be starting.
Dude, do you hate all QBs but Warner?moklerman said:Ask Bledsoe how much that means. Or Trent Green or Joe Montana or Tommy Maddox.
moklerman said:If the team's record was all that mattered, Jason White would have been in the NFL. Heck, he put up better numbers than Leinart. Now, that's an extreme example but he had a bad knee and marginal arm too.
What are you talking about? You think if Garrard takes Jacksonville to the Super Bowl he won't keep that job? The guys I mentioned are all good qb's who lost their job due to circumstance, not necessarily to better qb's.Dude, do you hate all QBs but Warner?
How did I know someone would miss the point. I was pointing out that the college team's record isn't indicitive of how good the qb will be in the NFL(like someone stated as a reason Leinart will be good).AH HA!! I knew this was coming. I'm actually surprised you didn't throw this little nugget out before.
moklerman said:Ask Bledsoe how much that means. Or Trent Green or Joe Montana or Tommy Maddox.
moklerman said:How did I know someone would miss the point. I was pointing out that the college team's record isn't indicitive of how good the qb will be in the NFL(like someone stated as a reason Leinart will be good).
.
You guy's don't even read the post do you? IF...IF...IF Garrard and Jacksonville win the Super Bowl and Leftwhich is injured on the sideline during that time, Garrard will stay the starter (in my opinion).So Garrard has won the job?
If anyone thinks being critical of a college qb's chance of success in the NFL is any way similar to thinking Shaun King is a good qb has another think coming.moklerman's quickly becoming the 2005 version of That Guy.
clif said:AH HA!! I knew this was coming. I'm actually surprised you didn't throw this little nugget out before.
Jason White (IIRC) blew out BOTH knees! He was a freaking statue for crying out loud. The guy had a great college career, but that was only after lobbying the NCAA for a 6th year of eligibility. There is very little if any comparison between his knees and Leinart's.
Also I do believe that the Sooners went to a more wide open passing type offense which is not generally run in the NFL so passing yards and all that of course will balloon.
As Russ has stated numerous times Leinart is running a PRO style offense and has been audibling in it for two years. I think Josh just started getting the green light to do that here in his 4th year in the NFL.
Let's also not forget that Pete Carroll is the DC for USC so you have to admit that Matt has been tutored and practiced against NFL type defenses for the past 4 years.
moklerman said:You guy's don't even read the post do you? IF...IF...IF Garrard and Jacksonville win the Super Bowl and Leftwhich is injured on the sideline during that time, Garrard will stay the starter (in my opinion).
If anyone thinks being critical of a college qb's chance of success in the NFL is any way similar to thinking Shaun King is a good qb has another think coming.
Russ Smith said:He won't pull an Aaron Rodgers free fall but I'm going to predict right now that Leinart won't go 2nd and might not even be the first QB drafted.
Something is wrong with this kid it's about the 4th time this year I've seen him either look like he has a concussion(which he might) or is sick. No velocity, I agree with Keith Jackson who said he took a lick earlier in the game and then the 2nd hard one late in the half.
I really think NFL scouts are going to look at him and say 2 arm surgeries, and beginning to look like he can't take hits without getting woozy, and he'll slide.
Great player but this is just too many times this year where he just looks like he is punch drunk or something.
red desert said:But what about that LenDale White kid? He MAY, I repeat MAY, be worthy of the number 10 pick.
john h said:Kipper has him in middle of first round and a strong RB that will do well in the NFL>
Damn. Pariah beat me to it.MaoTosiFanClub said:moklerman's quickly becoming the 2005 version of That Guy.
john h said:Kipper and his cronies have Leinhart,Young, and Bush going in the first three picks. He said the oder would depend on Houston. I think this has to be dead on and cannot imagine any other sceniero. These three guys may not even go to any NFL workouts or play in any bowl games. They are a lock pretty much to be in the top three. NO and TN need a QB and Houston may very well take Bush.
moklerman said:Well Russ, I guess you're just trying to prove my points. What round was Warner drafted in? Okay, if you think Leinart and Warner are so similar you completely agree that he should NOT be an overpriced first rounder. Thanks, I appreciate your support.
Let's just lump all your Warner insults into one response: You're a CARDINALS fan! You have no right to "try" and insult a super bowl winning, 2 time MVP. Warner will always have those things so until someone on the Cardinals even get's close please stop with your crapola. If you can't make a point without trying to insult me or my favorite current player, then don't bother trying. It won't work.
kerouac9 said:Young's OL was looking pretty good last night. Had less pressure on him than Leinart did. I mean, I dunno. I agree with Matt that 'SC had the better team last night, and Vince Young is a great college player, but I don't think he'll be a great pro. Honestly, I don't think he'll be a good pro.
Hard to invest a $20 million bonus in a guy who told ESPN last night that the secret to his success was that Mack Brown & Co. stopped coaching him.
Actually, what I said is:You said nothing about the Superbowl in the post I replied to, just lumped in Leftwich with other Wally Pipp's.
The point made in that thread was completely different than the one where I mentioned qb's how lost their job to injury to qb's who had a lot of success and/or won the Super Bowl. The post about Garrard was about how Leftwich wouldn't be Leftwich (in my opinion) if he had gone to the Cardinals so it's sadisitc to torture yourself in thinking that "if only we'd done this or that in the draft".Leftwhich is another example. Jacksonville's a good "team". That's why they just kept on winning when Garrard stepped in. Byron's good, but Arizona wouldn't be where Jacksonville is if they had drafted him.
Yeah, there's a core little group of you guys that seem to like patting yourself on the backs and insulting someone who doesn't agree with your visions of what's best for the Cardinals. I would take it more personally if I thought any of you were actually commenting on what I've written but it seems that once your opinions are established you don't bother to read someone's post, you just "know" what they're going to say.Damn. Pariah beat me to it.
That's it, don't try and stand on your own, get everyone to pat you on the back for how clever you are. Have I started an attack on anyone? Did I refute anyone's opinion based on their fandom of the Cardinals. Please post quotes if you don't mind. No, I gave back what I was given and asked that it stop. For some strange reason it keeps being brought up...?Because remember everybody, if anyone tells you that "you're a Cardinals fan and they suck" it disproves any point you're trying to make.
Hey, I admit it when I'm wrong but I would have bet my bottom dollar that Toretta was a lefty. I don't know who I was thinking of. It's got nothing to do with the point I was making, but you're right, Gino was a righty. The point was that he was a Heisman winner who was part of a dominant college team and then a total bust in the NFL. Left handed was just a coincidence that I thought ironic considering the correlation I was trying to make between the two. Any Miami Hurricane experts out there, cuz I can't figure out who I'm thinking of that was a lefty? I was sure that it was someone from Miami but who knows now.with you claiming that Gino Torreta was a southpaw and all.
That's so laughable I don't even know if I should acknowledge it. I've gone to great lengths to explain and illustrate my points of view. Right or wrong, I think you're way off base claiming I'm just some blowhard talking down to Cardinals fans. If you truly believe that then I can only assume you haven't read, understood, seen or some combination of those most of my posts.The mods should just delete this post. You never have one single basis for any thread you make. Your only existance on this board is to tell us how much better Kurt Warner is than us.
moklerman said:That's so laughable I don't even know if I should acknowledge it. I've gone to great lengths to explain and illustrate my points of view. Right or wrong, I think you're way off base claiming I'm just some blowhard talking down to Cardinals fans. If you truly believe that then I can only assume you haven't read, understood, seen or some combination of those most of my posts.
NEZCardsfan said:Sorry, I don't read your posts. I skim them. You kill your credibility when you start claiming Gino Torretta was a southpaw and had a 34 game winning streak. It's called Google....do a little research. You just look like you are making stuff up.