It isn't the gadget plays fault. It is the defense's fault for not tackling, and for not picking up a freaking extra point.
Really, even if we kicked the FG, we'd be down by one. We can't STOP them and get the ball back. Gadget plays are moot. We scored 23 points...if you can't win a game scoring 23 points, the first place to throw blame is NOT on the coach and "gadget plays." The defense stunk today.
No shane, they aren't. I posted this in the game thread:
And to add the cherry on top, they allowed a 13 yard run at the end of the game to deny the offense a chance to come back. The defense was horrible.
It was a good call on the FG...the TE just couldn't pick up the first.
Yes it is. And no it wasnt a good call on the FG It wasnt a good call because we obviously dont have the personnell speed wise to execute it. Donald your opinion is jaded. You think every gadget call is a good one. Have all year.
It was a good call on the FG...the TE just couldn't pick up the first.
I don't really care too much about this loss, but I'd run that fake FG everytime there. 7 times out of ten, we get the first. It was a good play...the TE just couldn't make the play. Patrick or pope probably would have.
Disagree... while these may show point wise the real reason was HORRIBLE TACKLING... this team needs to go back to high school to learn some basic tackling.Are why we lost this game.
Whiz seems to think that we can't win w/out trying at least one trick play every game. Seriously, every damn game. You think after a while teams might start looking for it?
Maybe we should try just beating the other team.
I don't really care too much about this loss, but I'd run that fake FG everytime there. 7 times out of ten, we get the first. It was a good play...the TE just couldn't make the play. Patrick or pope probably would have.
But it's moot, and that's my point. We could have scored on that play and probably would have still lost because our defense could NOT make a stop. Terrible tackling.
I don't really care too much about this loss, but I'd run that fake FG everytime there. 7 times out of ten, we get the first. It was a good play...the TE just couldn't make the play. Patrick or pope probably would have.
But it's moot, and that's my point. We could have scored on that play and probably would have still lost because our defense could NOT make a stop. Terrible tackling.
Yes it is. And no it wasnt a good call on the FG It wasnt a good call because we obviously dont have the personnell speed wise to execute it. Donald your opinion is jaded. You think every gadget call is a good one. Have all year.
I totally agree with you on the defense. They are the main unit to blame for the loss.
But, no way in hell that call would work 7 of 10 times against that defense. They had a SPY, just watching for a fake. And, we had 16 yards to go. Play shouldn't have been run. Timeout should've been called against that alignment. #30 would've had to have had his head completely buried in his ass to get beat by any TE on that call.
Shane your wrong!!! The play was there for a 1st down and probably a TD. Execution by the punter keep the play from working. Johnson threw the ball like a schoolgirl causing Tuman to have to wait on the ball and thus get caught by a defender coming from the other side of the field.
I don't really care too much about this loss, but I'd run that fake FG everytime there. 7 times out of ten, we get the first. It was a good play...the TE just couldn't make the play. Patrick or pope probably would have.
uh, isn't that part of the problem? You're depending on your punter to make a play on 4th and 16?