Dr. Jones
Has No Time For Love
- Joined
- Nov 2, 2004
- Posts
- 28,408
- Reaction score
- 17,255
This thread has over 250 posts....
![Popcorn :grabs: :grabs:](/forum/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/popcorn.gif)
![Popcorn :grabs: :grabs:](/forum/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/popcorn.gif)
Criticism is fine, considering his mishaps.
Perseverating over and augmenting his transgressions to make it look like he has zero concept of the position is unwarranted, IMO.
Just glad he had a game where he had to step up when the defense wasn't playing to its potential, even if he caused some of the problems.
I thought Williams was hurt, too. As Whis would say, I'm guessing that it was just WiPo's "turn to work."
We did the same thing with Bradley this season. I think we reduced his base salary from $5 million to $1 million. Maybe he accepts that pay cut again next offseason, maybe he decides that he wants a "make-good" chance with the Giants or something and takes off. I can't hammer on Bradley (or Heap for the same reason) as much these days because he took a massive pay cut and is merely overpaid instead of obscenely overpaid.
Yeah, I just stopped in to ask, "Have you guys resolved anything yet?This thread has over 250 posts....
![]()
You have to look beyond the stat sheet for that game and actually read through the play-by-play. Just whole quarters of three-and-outs, being completely non-productive except for one play. He didn't look like a legitimate NFL quarterback.
I think this time last year we were either getting pasted by the Vikings or losing to Washington close. I don't remember which. He looked like the guy in Washington last week, IMO.![]()
Have it your way! The Miami offense and their rookie quarterback had a fantastic day despite the awesome Cardinal defense.![]()
Scott Bordow of the Arizona Republic says the Cardinals' defensive players knew they got away with a ragged performance.
“This game here we didn’t play our best. We know that,” safety Kerry Rhodes said.
All around the Cardinals locker room, Rhodes’ teammates were nodding in agreement. This wasn’t the same defense that held New England to 18 points and tormented Michael Vick. Miami had 480 total yards and averaged 6.5 yards per play. Tannehill did a dead-on impersonation of Dan Marino against a blitzing defense that had even Tom Brady thinking twice.
What happened, as Campbell might say?
For one thing, Arizona didn’t play with the same fanatical fervor it did the first three weeks. Part of that was due to the absence of defensive end Darnell Dockett (hamstring), who often sets the tone with his play up front. It’s clear, too, that the Cardinals weren’t as amped up to play Miami as they had been Seattle, New England and Philadelphia.
It was a trap game, and the defense nearly got caught.
“It was not up to our standards. We want to be a lot better than that,” Lenon said.
http://www.azcentral.com/sports/car...ls-defense-not-up-to-standards.html#protected
Yeah I only watched it once and I don't think I saw the whole game. i saw the whole 2nd half so my perception is probably skewed.
You have to look beyond the stat sheet for that game and actually read through the play-by-play. Just whole quarters of three-and-outs, being completely non-productive except for one play. He didn't look like a legitimate NFL quarterback.
I think this time last year we were either getting pasted by the Vikings or losing to Washington close. I don't remember which. He looked like the guy in Washington last week, IMO.![]()
I think I read it has been since 1925 that we won the first 4 games of the year.
It doesn't matter much what Kolb did last year or the year before, or when he was in college or H.S. It's about as interesting as what he bought at the grocery store last week. QBs take time to learn systems, you can bring up a handful of QBs that pimped it right out of the gate but most good ones (Peyton, Eli, Brady,Rodgers) sucked balls when they got to their new team. You can say "Kolb's been in the league for years", but it still doesn't jive. Playtime experience is what a QB needs to get better.
And Kolb is going to get all the playingtime he can physically handle...literally!
And he should.
I think too many are just WAY WAY WAY too defensive of Kolb right now. But it is fair enough. It is fun to get excited about a player, especially a QB. Hell, I am excited about the position.
I am all for Kolb starting, I am all for Kolb and his play right now, but I am still going to talk about what negative things he does, and just because I say something negative doesn't mean I hate the guy, and want John Skelton to start in his place.
So, ya'll need to calm it down a little bit.
......that being said those who truly think Kolb is HORRIBLE got to get a grip. All this team needs is a solid/average QB that doesn't make mistakes. Kolb is doing a good job of that, and most importantly winning.
The rest is just people trying to be right, or being difficult for difficult sake.
The bug up my butt in this thread is how two-faced this place is about the QB position. But it is what it is, and who gives a damn when we are winning and 4-0.
I was a Skelton guy in the preseason. I admit it. Now that Kolb has shown that:
a) He can take a hit (or eight)
b) He can play clutch
I am ready to ride or die with him.
Sounds like Blok stunk it up at times, but brought us back for a hellacious victory. And I thank him for that! He's been nails so far this season--nowhere near perfect, but getting the wins and not caring about his form in doing so. He's this season's SkeltonGood on him for coming right, and I hope he keeps doing so. No reason to start up the thread for 'rubbing it in' mode, but I won't let it get to me. We're 4-0, and a few games we should win before us. Good times.
I didn't take anything out of context. I quoted what you wrote and responded to it. You don't like it? Tough. Funny how when you don't like a response you say you were joking. Yet no hint of it being a joke in your first post.![]()
while QB rating isnt everything
after 3.25 games, Kolb has a 97.6 passer rating with 7 tds to 2 ints
if he finishes the season with that rating and a td / int ratio of 3.5 to 1 --
i dont think the contract is touched and no way does the team take a qb round 1 or 2.
Gee, I was complimentary to Kolb, made a clear joke with the specifically catered joking smilie...but I didn't say Kolb walks on water, so I'm a big meanie![]()
you are correct. However, we are on an 8 game home win streak that is the longest since 1925. With it being so long since we've looked this good, there's a LOT of stats we're hearing about and it's easy to mix em up...
I'm enjoying knowing that this team can, and does, win with eitherAs I said board is a little defensive of Kolb right now. I guess a 4 month debate will do that.
I am not going to get upset that people are keyed up about the team and the QB they were hoping would be the starter in the fiest place.
I may not agree with the statements but I am all about the good vibes getting thrown to Kolb right now.
Sent from Rugbymuffin's Super Phone
In the preseason, my thoughts on this subject were clear:
Our QBs suck, Kolb will suck less.
I've changed a little on this. I no longer believe that Kolb sucks; he's somewhere between adequate and good. I think Kerouac is spot on that he's in the 15-25 range, but I would put him closer to 15 than 25.
Should we draft a QB? Not if we are a playoff team, I severely doubt that we would find a better QB/QB prospect in the 20's. It would be better to build the team further than to draft a QB that isn't likely to be better than Kolb.
Is Kolb better than Skelton? I think the answer is unequivocally yes. People can hide behind the 6-2 ( 6-2 DERP) all they want, but the numbers back up Kolb as the better QB. As someone else said earlier in the thread, does anyone honestly believe that Skelton could make that throw to Roberts in the front corner of the endzone? I don't think so, and I bet 32 NFL GMs wouldn't either. Skelton is a nice back up QB, but I don't think he's even a top 30 starter in the league. I'd take Matt Moore over Skelton and I'd probably take Byron Leftwich/Charlie Batch over Skelton. My point being is that he's not even a great backup.
As far as Kolb as a franchise guy, no that's not what he's becoming. He's becoming that Matt Hasselbeck-caliber starter. He's good enough to win you games, but not on his back. If you need him to make a big throw, he can do it, but don't expect him to carry your team.
Kolb is the answer for this team right now, and Skelton has no business taking the job back. Sure Kolb is going to make mistakes, but Skelton will make more and he won't make as many accurate throws.
I don't need to link it if you post here you've seen the posts of people saying Fitz is a different animal and you need to throw to him even when he doesn't have separation.![]()
Yes you do. You claimed it you have to back it up. Just like you always ask others to do.
All kidding aside, there is a distinct difference in wanting Cardinal QBs to throw the ball to Larry where only Larry being Larry can catch it and forcing the ball to Larry where even Larry being Larry can't catch it.
Kerry Rhodes is a good one to talk about playing bad though, it was his error that allow Miami to get back in the game.
The game is what it is, but Rhodes does his job, and Wilson/Toler can catch and we are singing a different tune.
If that is as bad as the defense plays this year, we will win the Superbowl.
I hope I saw this wrong but it really looked like AW was jogging for quite awhile before finally turning on the jets to try and catch him when it was too late. Did anyone else notice this?
there's a certain point when sprinting that you give up your balance to move a little faster. He may have decided he had to take that risk when he couldn't catch him normally
I hope he did do it. He was just out the week before with growing and ankle injuries. Don't need him going all out and risk further Injury for someone your VERY unlikely to catch regardless.
ADUB is still having growing pains??? He really IS a man-child! Jk but if we didn't win, I would bet your response would be different.