The Blackhawks is not racially tinged. It is the name of a Chief of the Sauk tribe and is depicted as a brave warrior. The Sauks were a tribe that was forced into Illinois and the Redskins is a term heaped upon a race of people that were summarily massacred and used as a derogatory. I think their is a difference between honoring a chief and naming a team the "redskins".
If anyone doesn't think this is so, read this
I believe an early name for the city now known as Chicago was "Black Hawk."
I'm less concerned about whether "Redskins" is offensive to me than I am whether it's offensive to a lot of people of Native American heritage.
On that note - I spent many an hour doing research (for my own enjoyment) overlaying ancient Native American foot-paths and trade routes atop modern day road maps. (Esoteric, but I found it infectious, because "one thing would inevitably lead to another"). Among other things, I've concluded that most folks don't know very much about the fascinating history of the so-called "First People" (i.e. their idea of American history seems to start with Dolly Madison).
I don't think Dan Snyder is a bad man; just ignorant and misguided. I get the "lighten up with the PC" counter-argument, but I must confess that the name "Redskin" makes me uncomfortable because it makes a lot of other people in our society uncomfortable (& doesn't exactly reflect favorably on Snyder as an educated individual living in a modern day world). I don't list this issue in my Top 5 or 10, but I just hope Mr. Snyder changes his position.
Side-note - No problem with the thread remaining on this board because it's topical, it's on many peoples' minds and it involves the NFL.