Pick Watch 2018

CardsSunsDbacks

Not So Skeptical
Joined
Aug 26, 2012
Posts
10,152
Reaction score
6,602
If the Suns get three first-rounders, they should keep all of them. If they don't have multiple players they like at #16, they haven't done their homework. So take two of them and hope that one pans out.
They are trying to take a step forward next year and adding 3 rookies to an already very young roster kind of thwarts that idea. Also if they use them to draft players it gives them less capitol to make trades and thus makes it harder for the team to get more veterans on the roster to increase on court productivity. Do you seriously want to see yet another year of young guys running around not knowing what they are doing and being dead last in both offense and defense? I know I don't.
 

pokerface

ASFN Addict
Joined
May 20, 2004
Posts
5,369
Reaction score
807
I do not expect the Suns to keep all their draft picks. They can be used to trade for a player or for a future first rounder.

This is a good draft so I do not expect any problems trading them unlike the 2014 NBA Draft where their value was diminished.

Yeah I don't expect them to keep all the picks either. I just hope we get good value in return.
 

elindholm

edited for content
Joined
Sep 14, 2002
Posts
27,488
Reaction score
9,700
Location
L.A. area
They are trying to take a step forward next year and adding 3 rookies to an already very young roster kind of thwarts that idea. Also if they use them to draft players it gives them less capitol to make trades and thus makes it harder for the team to get more veterans on the roster to increase on court productivity. Do you seriously want to see yet another year of young guys running around not knowing what they are doing and being dead last in both offense and defense? I know I don't.

Whether or not the Suns have an extra player taken at #17 should have no impact on their free agency pursuits, and nearly no impact on who gets playing time. Most first-round picks aren't really ready. Lottery picks play because their teams are bad enough that there isn't much competition. If the Suns get three players in the first round who legitimately belong in the rotation, that would be a miracle -- and frankly a possibility so remote that it's not worth worrying about.

Of course, there's no way to know whether it's the guy taken at #16 or the one taken at #17 who is destined for competence. That's why you take both and let them sort it out.
 

ColdPickleNachos

ASFN Lifer
Joined
Mar 5, 2016
Posts
2,578
Reaction score
1,659
Ideally, those picks can return real value, but if not then there are far worse things than using them. Take Mitchell Robinson, a player who could easily bust but who also has tremendous upside. Maybe you get lucky. Worst case scenario, you develop him in the g-league. No harm there.
 

CardsSunsDbacks

Not So Skeptical
Joined
Aug 26, 2012
Posts
10,152
Reaction score
6,602
Whether or not the Suns have an extra player taken at #17 should have no impact on their free agency pursuits, and nearly no impact on who gets playing time. Most first-round picks aren't really ready. Lottery picks play because their teams are bad enough that there isn't much competition. If the Suns get three players in the first round who legitimately belong in the rotation, that would be a miracle -- and frankly a possibility so remote that it's not worth worrying about.

Of course, there's no way to know whether it's the guy taken at #16 or the one taken at #17 who is destined for competence. That's why you take both and let them sort it out.
My point is that if you can trade one or both of those picks for some proven talent than why wouldn't you? As opposed to just spending them on a couple rookies that likely won't get any playing time. Obviously if we can't get anything of real value in return than just use the picks, but I would definitely try to trade them for someone established first.
 

elindholm

edited for content
Joined
Sep 14, 2002
Posts
27,488
Reaction score
9,700
Location
L.A. area
My point is that if you can trade one or both of those picks for some proven talent than why wouldn't you?

Sure, okay. We probably just disagree on what kind of "proven talent" is likely to be available in a trade for that kind of pick. My guess is, very little.
 

Mainstreet

Cruisin' Mainstreet
Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2003
Posts
118,027
Reaction score
58,324
Ideally, those picks can return real value, but if not then there are far worse things than using them. Take Mitchell Robinson, a player who could easily bust but who also has tremendous upside. Maybe you get lucky. Worst case scenario, you develop him in the g-league. No harm there.

I agree. Also the 31st pick should yield a good player.

Although I do not expect the Suns to keep all their picks because of trades, keeping them is not the worse case scenario. The Suns need talent.
 

CardsSunsDbacks

Not So Skeptical
Joined
Aug 26, 2012
Posts
10,152
Reaction score
6,602
Sure, okay. We probably just disagree on what kind of "proven talent" is likely to be available in a trade for that kind of pick. My guess is, very little.
I’m not suggesting trading them on their own, but as part of a package for a solid proven bet or in a bigger package for a star player.

They could also be packaged to maybe jump up in the draft if someone we like falls to around 10 or so.
 
OP
OP
JCSunsfan

JCSunsfan

ASFN Icon
Joined
Oct 24, 2002
Posts
22,114
Reaction score
6,547
List of #16 and #17 picks in the last 10 years:

Sean Williams, Nick Young, Roy Hibbert, Marreese Speights, Jrue Holiday, James Johnson, Kevin Seraphin, Luke Babbitt, Iman Shumpert, Nikola Vucevic, Tyler Zeller, Royce White, Dennis Schroder, Lucas Nogueira, James Young, Jusuf Nurkic, Rashad Vaughn, Terry Rozier, Wade Baldwin, Guerschon Yabusele, D.J. Wilson, Justin Patton
 

elindholm

edited for content
Joined
Sep 14, 2002
Posts
27,488
Reaction score
9,700
Location
L.A. area
List of #16 and #17 picks in the last 10 years:

Sean Williams, Nick Young, Roy Hibbert, Marreese Speights, Jrue Holiday, James Johnson, Kevin Seraphin, Luke Babbitt, Iman Shumpert, Nikola Vucevic, Tyler Zeller, Royce White, Dennis Schroder, Lucas Nogueira, James Young, Jusuf Nurkic, Rashad Vaughn, Terry Rozier, Wade Baldwin, Guerschon Yabusele, D.J. Wilson, Justin Patton

Thanks for compiling that. My takeaway is that the Suns may wind up with a serviceable player in that area if the draft, but if they can get two cracks at it, their chances will be better.
 
OP
OP
JCSunsfan

JCSunsfan

ASFN Icon
Joined
Oct 24, 2002
Posts
22,114
Reaction score
6,547
Thanks for compiling that. My takeaway is that the Suns may wind up with a serviceable player in that area if the draft, but if they can get two cracks at it, their chances will be better.
I would love to take credit, but I copied it from a poster on a Milwaukee board. They are pretty much convinced they don't want the pick this year. They would much rather lose a mid first rounder than have the potential of a better pick later.
 

elindholm

edited for content
Joined
Sep 14, 2002
Posts
27,488
Reaction score
9,700
Location
L.A. area
I would love to take credit, but I copied it from a poster on a Milwaukee board. They are pretty much convinced they don't want the pick this year. They would much rather lose a mid first rounder than have the potential of a better pick later.

I can't keep track of the insanely complicated protection on that pick, but isn't it more likely to go lower, not higher, if it isn't conveyed now?
 

CardsSunsDbacks

Not So Skeptical
Joined
Aug 26, 2012
Posts
10,152
Reaction score
6,602
I can't keep track of the insanely complicated protection on that pick, but isn't it more likely to go lower, not higher, if it isn't conveyed now?
We would get it at 4-16 next year, 8-30 in 2020 and unprotected in 2021. Most likely we would simply get it in the 20s in 2020 since there is no upper protection on it. However, the fear for Bucks fans and hope for Suns fans is that if we didn't get the pick this year is that something will happen that causes the Bucks to under perform next year and we then get it when it becomes a top 10 pick or so. Or it conveys in 2021 while it is unprotected and ends up being like the #1 pick or something like that.
 

ColdPickleNachos

ASFN Lifer
Joined
Mar 5, 2016
Posts
2,578
Reaction score
1,659
I can't keep track of the insanely complicated protection on that pick, but isn't it more likely to go lower, not higher, if it isn't conveyed now?

Next year, it can't go lower than 16 again. It has to be from 4-16.

In 2021 it would be unprotected.

The problem is 2020, when it is top 7 protected. Most likely scenario, it conveys in 2020 and is a mid-to-late pick.
 

ColdPickleNachos

ASFN Lifer
Joined
Mar 5, 2016
Posts
2,578
Reaction score
1,659
We would get it at 4-16 next year, 8-30 in 2020 and unprotected in 2021. Most likely we would simply get it in the 20s in 2020 since there is no upper protection on it. However, the fear for Bucks fans and hope for Suns fans is that if we didn't get the pick this year is that something will happen that causes the Bucks to under perform next year and we then get it when it becomes a top 10 pick or so. Or it conveys in 2021 while it is unprotected and ends up being like the #1 pick or something like that.

I guess the scenario where it pays off is if the Bucks are just okay next year, maybe the 6th seed in the East, and then they lose a frustrated Greek Freak, bottom out with a top 7 pick, and then continue to be awful in 2021 when the pick is unprotected.

It looks like we both came to the same conclusion though that it's probably a pick in the 20s two years from now. GMs will likely do the same, which means the trade value this offseason is better if the pick conveys.
 

elindholm

edited for content
Joined
Sep 14, 2002
Posts
27,488
Reaction score
9,700
Location
L.A. area
It looks like we both came to the same conclusion though that it's probably a pick in the 20s two years from now. GMs will likely do the same, which means the trade value this offseason is better if the pick conveys.

Thanks to both of you for the refresher. This sounds familiar. I remember thinking that the Suns would be better off getting it now, since its value seemed (probably) destined to depreciate.

Barring an injury to Antetokounmpo, it's hard to imagine the Bucks missing the playoffs in either of the next two years. Behind him, they have a solid (if unspectacular) core, and by far their most likely course of action is to figure out how far their young star can take them before they do anything drastic.
 
OP
OP
JCSunsfan

JCSunsfan

ASFN Icon
Joined
Oct 24, 2002
Posts
22,114
Reaction score
6,547
Thanks to both of you for the refresher. This sounds familiar. I remember thinking that the Suns would be better off getting it now, since its value seemed (probably) destined to depreciate.

Barring an injury to Antetokounmpo, it's hard to imagine the Bucks missing the playoffs in either of the next two years. Behind him, they have a solid (if unspectacular) core, and by far their most likely course of action is to figure out how far their young star can take them before they do anything drastic.
But they don't have a coach, they have a mgmt that has a very poor record of drafting. Giannis' body and style of play do seem to indicate injuries are a possibility.
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
553,663
Posts
5,410,612
Members
6,319
Latest member
route66
Top