Put that on Franklin, not on Allar. Also, I think Franklin tends to hurt QBs' development, especially as pertains to the NFL. The hope would be you could develop Allar before it's too late, or he could become another Hackenberg (sp?).
It makes perfect sense you just refuse to acknowledge it and want to play dumb. When I said I wanted a QB that can win a Superbowl you told me "lofty goals".
It doesn’t make sense & even you know it doesn’t make sense. C’mon now.
You’re incorrect just off the fact I know I have never posted “lofty goals” in all my years posting here.
I said I want a team that can -contend- for a Super Bowl. Building through the trenches. I would think that’s common sense on how to be a successful football team to everybody. I guess it’s not after conversing with you.
You didn’t even understand what the point you were trying to make. You probably still don’t, honestly.
There is a huge world between 4 wins and winning multiple playoff games. I don't mind being Pittsburgh in 2025, and keeping my QB options open after that season.
Here is your exact quote. If you want to play the semantics card.
I kinda disagree tho. None of those QBs are going to be a long term option. Your accelerated cap hit to cut Kyler is 58 mil. The cost of a new QB would be something like 5-30 mil? (Fields 5 and Darnold 30) Yes we have the money, but you are essentially paying 62-70(ish) mil for the same production vs Kyler's 43 mil cap hit. The only way that makes sense is if Kyler is a locker room problem which I don't see him being.
Dude, you asked who out there would be as good as Kyler and I answered. I'm sure you asked that in good faith, but this response is boring and moves the goalposts.
Bingo. Bite the bullet now when you have cap space to do it and so we’re rid of the problem in 2026.
It wasn't my intention to move the goalposts. Fair callout.
Fine, if you want a QB that chokes on the big one.
whoa , guys over here talkin about chokin' on big ones. I dont want any of that bruv
