Scouting reports written by real scouts or Mel Kiper? Why is it that these guys are WAY wrong all the time? Is it that there is some difference on opinions on players and that this process is subjective. I argue this every year, good draft or bad draft. It's the same annoying song and dance every year on this board.
The front office is wrong most of the time. I just don't make judgments on players I've never watched, and I also trust the opinion of Mike Mayock.
Kiper seems to be right more than Whiz.
4 RB's in the last 5 drafts and the running game is still crap.
8 LB's and the LB corp still sucks
4 Olinmen taken in 5 drafts Oline sucks
2 DT's taken for the purpose of playing NT, one is now a DE and took forever to develop and the other rode pine most of last year
3 TE's drafted in 5 drafts for an offense that rarely uses TEs effectively.
This staff either sucks at either evaluating talent and/or developing talent. Now talk of bringing in Bulger as the QB????? 2011 is going to be another long year.