Harry
ASFN Consultant and Senior Writer
You’ve got to be close to receivers for intNo ballhawks
You’ve got to be close to receivers for intNo ballhawks
Melton was supposed to be, right? Or am I remembering that wrong from the draft?No ballhawks
Very fair! OK, fumble then!You’ve got to be close to receivers for int
I was thinking the exact same thing lol.I don’t see how going for two helps your punter
The one thing this staff does better than the past few staffs are making halftime adjustments.
Have we had one in the last ten years or so? It's been so long I honestly can't remember our last true cover cover that was worth a damn.Melton was supposed to be, right? Or am I remembering that wrong from the draft?
Only Rabbit was ballhawk. got a few picks but not considered an aggressive CBMelton was supposed to be, right? Or am I remembering that wrong from the draft?
A KK team would have folded already and started eating their orange slices.Not even close to being onboard with this
What about Rabbit?No ballhawks
Ah yes, now I'm remembering. Thanks!Only Rabbit was ballhawk. got a few picks but not considered an aggressive CB
Honey badger!Have we had one in the last ten years or so? It's been so long I honestly can't remember our last true cover cover that was worth a damn.
Not playingWhat about Rabbit?
Yeah. That long. LolHoney badger!
That's been a problem all year. And something Budda never does.You’ve got to be close to receivers for int