He is the shiniest tomato can, and the most successful at rushing the passer! Getting rid of whatever talent to retain the junk we have doesn't make much sense to me.
So why play him anywhere else if he's a liability? Have him do what he's good at, and maybe he develops to that end. We're not trying to win games, remember?
Having some guys actually good at one thing would be a huge improvement!
Still a tomato can at the end of the day. We got rid of junk while still having junk.
If he’s not good at anywhere else, you get rid of him.
Like I told Harry, just blitz 50 times a game??? If this was Madden & he had ultimate fatigue, then I would be all for it.
That’s true. Unless we have low expectations, we should hope the 8th overall pick would be good at more than just one thing.
Where did I recognize he was right on Dobbs? Come on Vivek, you know I didn't write that anywhere.
You didn't do anything other than attack the article writer - his content was spot on, but you obviously didn't address it, because it goes against your opinion.
Don’t forget throwing an ugly Vivek insult your way also.
I'd rather have junk with a glimmer of hope than well junk, but whatever.
If you had compelling reasons to keep other roster lint around, I'd agree. Trying to get something out of Simmons seems to be a more worthwhile use of time than the vast majority of our roster.
No - but you can use him in sub packages and as a situational pass rusher...teams do it all the time.
How about we give him a shot out of training camp with a new FO? Worst case you dump him after the season. Not much lost.
Of course you can hope that - but if he truly is just good at one thing, why not at least use him that way? We have plenty of guys that are good at no things that will be playing lots of snaps.
Ha - politics make some people crazy. Others get the same effect from being Cards fanatics.
So is your boy Zaven Collins a bust?
You’re absolutely correct and also correct about him being a liability. But we would’ve been much better off admitting this two years ago, and just using him as a situational pass rusher to at least get something out of him instead of trying to make him a complete football player that can be on the field all the time just because he was the eighth pick.
Ugly? It's a joke.
Hilarious comparing someone to a raving, fascist lunatic!
His content was citing a bunch of PFF stats. Jones has been OK. He's a fringe starter at best. He was going to be the 4th tackle but offers no G/T versatility like Elijah Wilkinson and Dennis Daley (shudder). Beachum has been a solid starter at both LT and RT.
No I'm comparing him to guy who can't get quotes right at all, making claims that aren't there.
My dog, I see you make no mention of the part of the article I literally quoted - you can just say you agree that the Dobbs move makes no sense, it's ok, I'll still think you're a Cards fan!
Honestly, it makes sense IF something is going to happen with McCoy. I'm waiting to see if that shoe drops. I try not to be too reactionary about any of the moves that this team makes.
Really, what difference does McCoy make? If he's cooked at this point, why not run out Tune? He doesn't look lost or that starting would be too big for him. Regardless, who cares if he flames out? We're tanking, right? Expecting to lose?
Ok - why?
www.fantasypros.com
We literally just drafted one - now we're giving up more assets for a guy that was considered 3rd string for the Browns.
Really, what difference does McCoy make? If he's cooked at this point, why not run out Tune? He doesn't look lost or that starting would be too big for him. Regardless, who cares if he flames out? We're tanking, right? Expecting to lose?
Ok - why?
David Blough vs. Joshua Dobbs Stats | FantasyPros
View a side-by-side comparison of David Blough and Joshua Dobbs. Quickly compare stats, fantasy rankings and points to find out which player is a better option in your fantasy football league.
If you're trying to tell me there is a significant difference between these two QB's, I'd love for you to explain why.
We literally just drafted one - now we're giving up more assets for a guy that was considered 3rd string for the Browns.
Again - please show me how bringing a QB in at the end of training camp who has so far been David Blough quality moves the needle in any way.
Fake news.Really, what difference does McCoy make? If he's cooked at this point, why not run out Tune? He doesn't look lost or that starting would be too big for him. Regardless, who cares if he flames out? We're tanking, right? Expecting to lose?
Ok - why?
David Blough vs. Joshua Dobbs Stats | FantasyPros
View a side-by-side comparison of David Blough and Joshua Dobbs. Quickly compare stats, fantasy rankings and points to find out which player is a better option in your fantasy football league.
If you're trying to tell me there is a significant difference between these two QB's, I'd love for you to explain why.
We literally just drafted one - now we're giving up more assets for a guy that was considered 3rd string for the Browns.
Again - please show me how bringing a QB in at the end of training camp who has so far been David Blough quality moves the needle in any way.
sports.yahoo.com
Hold up - are you really insinuating that Dobbs was going to be the 2nd string QB in Cleveland? Lol, nobody is making that argument anywhere. He had already been passed by DTR! If you're not aware of the most basics here, what are we doing?Fake news.
Fake news.
Kevin Stefanski names Joshua Dobbs backup quarterback
The Browns have named their backup.
Krang - I've seen them both play. They are both career backups in the NFL. The difference between the two is minimal, and certainly not worth the cost of a 5th round pick. I showed you a direct comparison of their actual performances so far in the NFL - basically the Spiderman meme.
4th round pedigree? lol. By that logic Tune should be best of show. Dude was a FA and offered 1.5m. Browns found a better option in the draft and immediately dumped him. Pedigree. Incredible.
You're paying real assets for crap on a glass plate instead of paper. Good GM'ing!
good dating advise . .
It's not insinuating anything...Stefanski literally named Dobbs 2nd string yesterday morning, with DTR 3rd string...then the trade happened. It's facts, not insinuation.
Ok - why do you think Cleveland was willing to trade Dobbs? Because DTR had supplanted him and they could get actual value from their 3rd string QB.
Or maybe the 5th round pick was what it took to pry him away from Cleveland. I would bet that the Browns were happy to keep him and Monti just wasn't offering enough, until he was. The facts remain, he was named the backup yesterday, just a couple hours before the trade. It's in Stefanski's daily press conference. Every player is available...for a price.
