SUNS at TRAILBLAZERS Game Thread

Proteus

ASFN Icon
Joined
Nov 26, 2007
Posts
12,936
Reaction score
5,741
Nash, Shaq, Hill, and Richardson all played the whole 3rd quarter (aside from Shaq not playing the last 12 seconds). What kind of rotation is that? :rolleyes:
 

Mainstreet

Cruisin' Mainstreet
Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2003
Posts
119,352
Reaction score
59,956
At this point, you're better off vomiting all over yourself than posting on this message board anymore. You contribute nothing of substance and are part of the reason I dont frequent the Suns MB much

Everyone is entitled to an opinion.
 

Evil Ash

Henchman Supreme
Joined
Jun 26, 2003
Posts
9,757
Reaction score
1,987
Location
On a flying cocoon
Nash, Shaq, Hill, and Richardson all played the whole 3rd quarter (aside from Shaq not playing the last 12 seconds). What kind of rotation is that? :rolleyes:

I'm pretty sure Barnes was in there for a chunk in the 3rd qtr. There were 9 players that played tonight. I'm not sure D'Antoni knew who the 4th person on his bench was/is.

I'm giving Porter some leeway considering we did just make a trade and he has to find a way to fit in the personnel
 

Ninjafish

Registered
Joined
Nov 28, 2007
Posts
610
Reaction score
0
Nash, Shaq, Hill, and Richardson all played the whole 3rd quarter (aside from Shaq not playing the last 12 seconds). What kind of rotation is that? :rolleyes:

I think they played the entire 1st quarter too. Porter's been doing this.
 

Wonder

Registered
Joined
Mar 12, 2008
Posts
183
Reaction score
0
The only things I'm looking for is:

- Just be healthy, and by healthy that comes with a little luck, no major injuries.
- The suns should be able to play .700 ball after the Jrich trade.
- I would hope they end up playing .750, and if we're real lucky they're almost at .800 after the all star break (after the J-rich trade).

This is certainly not out of reach and this should not be considered an exaggeration after Richardson had arrived. Let's see what they do with this backup PG search.
 
Last edited:

HooverDam

Registered User
Joined
May 21, 2005
Posts
6,560
Reaction score
0
Actually i am a bit psychic.

WTF?

Anyway, yes the SUNS have some poor defensive players.

Some? Who do they have thats good at defense? Of their top 7 guys, only 2 are average at D (Hill and Barnes), the rest are below average.

The notion that D'Antoni's teams are bad defensive teams just because he has bad defensive players and thus is exempt from blame is also silly.

Huh? D'Antoni, Porter, Phill Jackson, Red Aurebach, or whomever can't suddenly take guys (like Nash) who aren't physically capable of being good defenders and turn them into that. And most coaches probably can't motivate a guy like Amare to become a great defender if he doesn't want to be.

D'Antoni's teams will ALWAYS be poor defensive teams...because defense is not important to DA(do you dispute this?).

I think thats way over simplifying things, which you're often prone to do. To say that defense is 'unimportant' to D'Antoni or any NBA coach is ridiculous. If you read ":07 Seconds or Less" or have ever listened to an interview with the guy, you know he doesn't not care about defense. Now, is it his #1 priority? No. But its an over simplification to say he just said "screw it, lets not even try to stop anyone".

Defense is much more important to Porter(do you dispute this?)

Sure, and winning the lottery is important to me, but that doesn't mean its going to magically happen because I will it to.

I see your point as far as having good defensive players...i really do but why take the angle that Porter can't coach it? Thats just not a smart statement.

My point is, no coach is going to turn Nash into a great defender. No coach is going to take Shaqs aging body and turn it into a well oiled machine that can actually move laterally or cover the pick and roll. Very few coaches would probably ever be able to motivate Amare into taking his defense as serious as he takes his offense.

I'm not blaming Porter or D'Antoni for the Suns porous defense, I'm blaming the roster, which I think is the only thing that makes sense. In the NBA when you have the best players, guess what, you usually win. When you have good individual defensive players, your team defense ends up being good. I don't see how this is rocket science or really debatable.

At this point, you're better off vomiting all over yourself than posting on this message board anymore. You contribute nothing of substance and are part of the reason I dont frequent the Suns MB much

Oh but this post was contributing something of substance?

First of all, Barnes is not the starter. Hill is.

Well thats true right now, but Barnes was starting for a while and is still playing more minutes than Hill. So while he may not be the first small forward on the court, he's the primary small forward.

Roy got hot and it didn't matter who was guarding him. You could have had Bowen and Artest guarding him and it wouldn't have made any difference.

I agree, for the most part in the NBA a great offensive player will trump a great defensive player. No one is going to slow Kobe or MJ, or Roy the way he was on fire tonight, so c'est la vie.
 
Last edited:

Mainstreet

Cruisin' Mainstreet
Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2003
Posts
119,352
Reaction score
59,956
I'd like you to find me a team that feels like they can play good defense only in critical stretches that has a prayers chance of winning a title.

Do you think every NBA Championship team played tough defense the entire 48 minutes of every game?

Actually I think the Spurs might qualify based on the criteria you present above.
 

cly2tw

Registered User
Joined
Oct 26, 2002
Posts
5,832
Reaction score
0
The critical moment was in the 3rd when Amare sat with 4th foul. We had 86-79 lead but fell behind 93-98 before Amare came back to start the 4th quarter. We should have put in LB who was great so far to give Nash a rest.

Then, Aldridge's clock beating banker at 1:25 broke us. It's just such a night that Aldridge, Blake, Roy, and Outlaw took turns to burn us no matter how we defended.
 
OP
OP
mojorizen7

mojorizen7

ASFN Addict
Joined
Oct 16, 2007
Posts
9,165
Reaction score
472
Location
In a van...down by the river.
WTF?
I think thats way over simplifying things, which you're often prone to do. To say that defense is 'unimportant' to D'Antoni or any NBA coach is ridiculous. If you read ":07 Seconds or Less" or have ever listened to an interview with the guy, you know he doesn't not care about defense. Now, is it his #1 priority? No. But its an over simplification to say he just said "screw it, lets not even try to stop anyone".
I began reading it a few weeks ago. Its very interesting so far.....but it doesn't change my stance on DA's philosophy.
 

HooverDam

Registered User
Joined
May 21, 2005
Posts
6,560
Reaction score
0
I began reading it a few weeks ago. Its very interesting so far.....but it doesn't change my stance on DA's philosophy.

I haven't read it since I came out, but I seem to recall a few passages of DA talking defense. Like I said, it wasn't his number 1 priority, obviously, but I think the whole 'D'Antoni is only about the offense' is an over simplification of the truth.
 

cly2tw

Registered User
Joined
Oct 26, 2002
Posts
5,832
Reaction score
0
I haven't read it since I came out, but I seem to recall a few passages of DA talking defense. Like I said, it wasn't his number 1 priority, obviously, but I think the whole 'D'Antoni is only about the offense' is an over simplification of the truth.

Correct. He is about non-stop trackmeet like offense, not just any offense.:D
 

Black Jesus

No Talent Ass-Clown
Joined
Nov 20, 2006
Posts
2,052
Reaction score
1
Location
U of A
52 for Roy is ridiculous. I'm not sure he'll ever get that again. Who was covering him? Richardson? Or did they manage to mismatch Nash EVERY possession on him?
 

SirStefan32

Krycek, Alex Krycek
Joined
Oct 15, 2002
Posts
18,497
Reaction score
4,913
Location
Harrisburg, PA
52 for Roy is ridiculous. I'm not sure he'll ever get that again. Who was covering him? Richardson? Or did they manage to mismatch Nash EVERY possession on him?

But that's the thing- Barnes, Hill, and Richardson all took turns on him. There was no stopping him. Artest and Bowen could have guarded him and it wouldn't have made any difference.
 

HooverDam

Registered User
Joined
May 21, 2005
Posts
6,560
Reaction score
0
At least the Blazers fans had fun:

You must be registered for see images attach
 

AfroSuns

ASFN Lifer
Supporting Member
Joined
Apr 17, 2008
Posts
3,441
Reaction score
7
Location
Phoenix AZ
Who the hell cares about a December close loss to a team the Suns have beaten twice already this season?
Suns bandwagon fans. That's who.
Yes, The 52 point from Roy is an embarrassment, something that will probably never happen again but this Portland team have been playing extremely well recently, i can leave with a 2-1 record.
 
Last edited:

Cheesebeef

ASFN IDOL
Supporting Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2003
Posts
92,206
Reaction score
70,477
Im so glad Terry Porter is here to teach everyone defense :rolleyes:

i thought you just wanted to be entertained? have you not been entertained in the last 6 games the same way you were in the last 4 years? high scoring, no D, wins some, lose some?
 

HooverDam

Registered User
Joined
May 21, 2005
Posts
6,560
Reaction score
0
i thought you just wanted to be entertained? have you not been entertained in the last 6 games the same way you were in the last 4 years? high scoring, no D, wins some, lose some?

Who said I hadn't? This is the first game I've been able to watch from start to finish in some time though as Ive been working 70+ hours a week, but it was certainly fun even though they did lose in the end.

The reason I typed what I did was to point out how silly the whole notion of changing a coach, but keeping a roster much the same, and expecting different results or a markedly different style is.
 
Last edited:

dreamcastrocks

Chopped Liver Moderator
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
Aug 19, 2005
Posts
46,291
Reaction score
11,926
I was entertained, that's for sure. This Suns team wins this type of game 8 out of 10 times. Not worried.
 

Arizona's Finest

Your My Favorite Mistake
Joined
Jun 11, 2005
Posts
9,709
Reaction score
1
I have watched 4 -5 games this year and the Suns have looked mostly horrible in all of them (@ Houston both times against LA)

This loss I am not discouraged about in the least. It would have been nice if we could have slowed down Roy a little but he will never be that hot again and he is a good player. Plus Blake and Outlaw were hitting some absoutely ridiculous shots to keep them in the game in the 2nd and 4th quarter respectively.

But man is this offense going to be good. I am actually MUCH more excited about the offensive potential of this team then any Suns team like....ever. The inside/outside combo has to be one of the best in the league. Shaq, Amare, Barnes, and Richardson all looked in the flow and I was impressed how fluid it all looked. While the Blazers were hitting stupid shots it seemed like the Suns were just knocking down the open ones.

It would be nice if we had a perimeter stopper on defense but this is the best I have felt about the team all year.

One thing I was playing with in my head last night. Would you guys trade Nash for Outlaw, Blake, and Bayless??

I might. More and more it seems he is becoming the weak link on the team.
 

NDSunsfan

Registered
Joined
Jul 19, 2002
Posts
322
Reaction score
0
I have watched 4 -5 games this year and the Suns have looked mostly horrible in all of them (@ Houston both times against LA)

This loss I am not discouraged about in the least. It would have been nice if we could have slowed down Roy a little but he will never be that hot again and he is a good player. Plus Blake and Outlaw were hitting some absoutely ridiculous shots to keep them in the game in the 2nd and 4th quarter respectively.

But man is this offense going to be good. I am actually MUCH more excited about the offensive potential of this team then any Suns team like....ever. The inside/outside combo has to be one of the best in the league. Shaq, Amare, Barnes, and Richardson all looked in the flow and I was impressed how fluid it all looked. While the Blazers were hitting stupid shots it seemed like the Suns were just knocking down the open ones.

It would be nice if we had a perimeter stopper on defense but this is the best I have felt about the team all year.

One thing I was playing with in my head last night. Would you guys trade Nash for Outlaw, Blake, and Bayless??

I might. More and more it seems he is becoming the weak link on the team.

Agreed (with most of it). This was the first game this season that's been fun to watch. That was the most uplifting part of the entire game. Love having Barnes bring his game (energy-swagger) off the bench.

There was no way anyone could stop Roy. Steve Blake will NEVER shoot like that again, and Outlaw was in the zone for 10 minutes and played more aggressively in that span than I've ever seen him be. 3 crazy atypical performances and they barely beat the Suns. I like the Suns chances.

When Blake got hot in the 2nd quarter, you could see the Suns were going under the screens giving him the shot. He just made them. I'll take my chances with Steve Blake shooting 20 footers anytime.

As far as the trade possibility: no way if I had a say. Blake and Outlaw play like that once every other full moon. They went off last night. Big deal.......

I love JRich and Barnes. Great pick-ups. I'm OK with Porter, he seems to be trying different things. Rather than, "we're doing it this way for now and evermore, so get used to it."

I liked his quote where he said if the Suns play with that energy all the time, they'll be alright. I agree.

Two weeks ago, we'd have been thrilled to be that close to the Blazers with the performances they gave last night. Now we're disappointed. The Suns are better now than they were then. They're improving. I like that.....
 

Latest posts

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
556,394
Posts
5,435,628
Members
6,329
Latest member
cardinals2025
Top