Suns, Eric Bledsoe Far Apart In Talks

sunsfan88

ASFN Icon
BANNED BY MODERATORS
Joined
Feb 1, 2010
Posts
11,660
Reaction score
844
Even if he informed Detroit of the intent, it's still not valid until he signs. Anything can happen until then, including his changing his mind.

http://www.usatoday.com/story/sport...free-agent-pistons-qualifying-offer/12940893/

I'm not an expert on this and I could easily be wrong but I think its basically a verbal agreement. It would be like Isaiah Thomas agreeing to a contract with the Suns before July 9th (the date contracts can be signed officially) and then backing out before that date because something else happened. Or the Suns pulling the offer before July 9th.

You don't see it happen very often or at all. Once they agree to it verbally, its basically done.
 

AzStevenCal

ASFN IDOL
Supporting Member
Joined
Apr 2, 2004
Posts
36,867
Reaction score
16,679
I'm not an expert on this and I could easily be wrong but I think its basically a verbal agreement. It would be like Isaiah Thomas agreeing to a contract with the Suns before July 9th (the date contracts can be signed officially) and then backing out before that date because something else happened. Or the Suns pulling the offer before July 9th.

You don't see it happen very often or at all. Once they agree to it verbally, its basically done.

I'm no expert either but I don't think it's the same thing. Mostly because I don't think there'd be the backlash that would normally happen when you fail to honor an oral agreement. It's not like Detroit is jumping for joy, they'd like to sign him to a long term contract or move him for quality assets.

Steve
 
Last edited:

sunsfan88

ASFN Icon
BANNED BY MODERATORS
Joined
Feb 1, 2010
Posts
11,660
Reaction score
844
I'm no expert either but I don't think it's the same thing. Mostly because I don't think there'd be the backlash that would normally happen when you fail to honor an oral agreement. It's not like Detroit is jumping for joy, they'd like to sign him to a long term contract or move him for quality assets.

Steve
Your right, it could be like that.
"Anonymous" sources reporting his intent isn't Monroe signing the QO.

USA Today probably has better sources than anyone else. I highly doubt they would flat out say that Monroe has told the Pistons he's taking the QO if he hasn't done it yet.

It's one thing if they said "Monroe's interested in taking the QO" or "Monroe is getting close to taking the QO".

But they didn't. They said for sure he's informed them he's taking it and that means just that. This isn't some guy on a forum breaking news or an ESPN hack like Broussard throwing dirt at the wall to see what sticks.
 

chickenhead

Registered User
Joined
Jul 7, 2004
Posts
3,109
Reaction score
77
It should also be mentioned that if he does take the QO for next season, he is afforded the right to deny any trade. So the Suns aren't only limited to trading him to a team he wants to play for, they are also limited in what they can get back due to the low salary he will be making. The Suns will retain the ability to pay him more than anyone else, but that seems like a waste since his going that route pretty much says he doesn't want to play for the team. So if he does make that choice, he is screwing the Suns. That has to play into how they use him next year. Do they play him a lot and not worry about injury, or do they bench him for not being mentally on the team?

Good points. I would guess that if Bledsoe takes the QO, he'll want the time because it's a contract year; he'll get the playing time the Suns feel helps the team, and the team will try to move him by the deadline.

But it could be tricky. Because of the salary matching, is the most likely trade partner a team that's bad enough to deal a decent draft pick, but attractive enough that Bledsoe would want to extend there? Say, the Lakers 2016 first rounder; or the Celtics 2015 first-rounder they got from the Clippers if they move Rondo this year. Just throwing those out there--I'm no trade/cap expert.
 

JS22

Say Vandelay!
Joined
Oct 21, 2002
Posts
5,791
Reaction score
211
I still think a question that hasn't adequately been answered is how Bledsoe fits into our plans if he takes the QO. He will be in a place where he will have to play for his next contract, but if he has burned bridges by taking this route, what possible motivation do we have to play him like a star? If we know he isn't going to be part of our future, why bother playing him at all? He's making the choice.

Now I know the Suns organization aren't a bunch of jerks and probably won't deliberately limit his minutes, but I think it's an intriguing question. This isn't some end-of-the-bench guy who we don't care about. I just don't see the motivation by the Suns to play a guy who doesn't give a damn about being on the team.

It's an interesting situation. I'm sure many people would want the Suns to just "sit his ass and the end of the bench." That's a fun thought, but it will never happen. I'm guessing he'd get just as many minutes as normal (maybe a little less now that Thomas on the roster) and bolt at the end of the year.

For a team that thrived on chemistry it's going to be interesting if Bledsoe takes the QO.
 

devilalum

Heavily Redacted
Joined
Jul 30, 2002
Posts
16,776
Reaction score
3,187
Let's say that Bledsoe rolls the dice and plays for the QO. Doing that says loud and clear that he has no desire to play here any longer than he has to. So if you're the Suns and you know he's totally playing for himself and not the team, how much do you play him? How do his teammates react to him knowing that he wants to be somewhere else? Hopefully we won't have to find out.

On one hand you play the players that give you the best opportunity to win. On the other hand you play the players that are going to be around when you're contending for a higher playoff seed. If Bledsoe is just a one year rental I could see the Suns giving some of his minutes to a player like Goodwin or Ennis. They have to act in the teams best interest short and long term.

If he signs the QO its gonna be a dark cloud hanging over the team all year.
 

chickenhead

Registered User
Joined
Jul 7, 2004
Posts
3,109
Reaction score
77
I wonder how much chemistry will be affected. Many of the players will be wanting to sign big contracts themselves, and maybe there's a little more solidarity in that regard. Plus players like Ennis and Thomas may be just fine with the idea of Bledsoe being a lame duck.

But there's still the chance that Bledsoe plays well, they make a playoff run, the money is there, and he signs with the Suns.
 

elindholm

edited for content
Joined
Sep 14, 2002
Posts
27,541
Reaction score
9,821
Location
L.A. area
If Bledsoe takes the one-year and agrees to a trade, his new team would not have his Bird rights, so he'd basically be a UFA again (Coon's FAQ #100). Taking the one-year does not provide him with any flexibility; all it does is push this process back a year.
 

Cheesebeef

ASFN IDOL
Supporting Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2003
Posts
92,165
Reaction score
70,341
Your right, it could be like that.


USA Today probably has better sources than anyone else. I highly doubt they would flat out say that Monroe has told the Pistons he's taking the QO if he hasn't done it yet.

It's one thing if they said "Monroe's interested in taking the QO" or "Monroe is getting close to taking the QO".

But they didn't. They said for sure he's informed them he's taking it and that means just that. This isn't some guy on a forum breaking news or an ESPN hack like Broussard throwing dirt at the wall to see what sticks.

and yet a day later, all we've seen is Van Gundy say he's heard nothing about this and Monroe has yet to sign the QO. In other words... nothing has happened to substantiate this report.
 

TJ

Frank Kaminsky is my Hero.
Joined
Apr 2, 2005
Posts
35,158
Reaction score
21,461
Location
South Bay
Who else is numb to this situation?

Quite frankly, I don't care anymore. Bledsoe and/or his agent are morons.
 

chickenhead

Registered User
Joined
Jul 7, 2004
Posts
3,109
Reaction score
77
If Bledsoe takes the one-year and agrees to a trade, his new team would not have his Bird rights, so he'd basically be a UFA again (Coon's FAQ #100). Taking the one-year does not provide him with any flexibility; all it does is push this process back a year.

Thanks for the clarification! So then the likely trade partner is someone viewing him as a deadline rental, who may have a hope to re-sign him, but that's it? If so, barring a cheap player they really want for some reason, the Suns might as well keep him for their own playoff run and hope he considers re-signing?
 

82CardsGrad

7 x 70
Joined
Dec 31, 2004
Posts
36,260
Reaction score
8,286
Location
Scottsdale
and yet a day later, all we've seen is Van Gundy say he's heard nothing about this and Monroe has yet to sign the QO. In other words... nothing has happened to substantiate this report.

Additionally, it was being reported yesterday that Monroe stated on multiple occasions that he never actually received the offers from the Pistons that have been reported in the media! Very confusing to say the least...
 

Chaz

observationist
Joined
Mar 11, 2003
Posts
11,327
Reaction score
7
Location
Wandering the Universe
Who else is numb to this situation?

Quite frankly, I don't care anymore. Bledsoe and/or his agent are morons.

co-sign

All the stupid news articles stating the same stupid speculation over and over is annoying. Until he signs or camp starts I don't much care anymore.
 

Cheesebeef

ASFN IDOL
Supporting Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2003
Posts
92,165
Reaction score
70,341
co-sign

All the stupid news articles stating the same stupid speculation over and over is annoying. Until he signs or camp starts I don't much care anymore.

co-co-sign. wake me when some kind of contract is signed.
 

Jay Cardinal

Die Hard Cardinals Fan
Joined
Nov 15, 2004
Posts
1,339
Reaction score
323
Location
Tempe, AZ
Who else is numb to this situation?

Quite frankly, I don't care anymore. Bledsoe and/or his agent are morons.

Agreed, at this point it is just fascinating that we have almost 750 posts with so little progress on his contract. If Bledsoe's agent had this much communication, he would have signed months ago.
 

TRW

ASFN Addict
Joined
Jan 13, 2003
Posts
7,855
Reaction score
7,587
Location
Avondale, AZ
Coming to a theater near you:

"The Thread That Wouldn't Die!"

LOL

Can't wait until a year from now when this is bumped by someone when he becomes a free agent after signing the QO.

Or, even worse, he signs the QO, has a sucky year and THEN someone bumps this thread to complain he's here for three more years.

Either way, it'll be baaaaackkkk!

I also don't care much any more. Whatever they do I am sick of Bledsoe and his agent.
 

TJ

Frank Kaminsky is my Hero.
Joined
Apr 2, 2005
Posts
35,158
Reaction score
21,461
Location
South Bay
Who else is numb to this situation?

Quite frankly, I don't care anymore. Bledsoe and/or his agent are morons.

co-co-sign. wake me when some kind of contract is signed.

co-sign

All the stupid news articles stating the same stupid speculation over and over is annoying. Until he signs or camp starts I don't much care anymore.

Tri-Cosign... :bigyawn:

Agreed, at this point it is just fascinating that we have almost 750 posts with so little progress on his contract. If Bledsoe's agent had this much communication, he would have signed months ago.

Should we start a petition and send it to Sarver and the Bledsoe camp?
 

Azlen

ASFN Lifer
Joined
Apr 29, 2004
Posts
3,724
Reaction score
943
Thanks for the clarification! So then the likely trade partner is someone viewing him as a deadline rental, who may have a hope to re-sign him, but that's it? If so, barring a cheap player they really want for some reason, the Suns might as well keep him for their own playoff run and hope he considers re-signing?

If he's playing under a QO then he has the right to void any trade. He has to be okay with wherever it is he gets traded to which would limit the Suns options for trading him.
 

Cheesebeef

ASFN IDOL
Supporting Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2003
Posts
92,165
Reaction score
70,341
If he's playing under a QO then he has the right to void any trade. He has to be okay with wherever it is he gets traded to which would limit the Suns options for trading him.

this is true, but the above pretty much goes for any guy about to be a FA anyway. Most teams aren't going to give up valuable pieces for a six month rental (see the Lakers idiocy with Gasol and our reluctance to sweeten the deal for proof of that).
 

Phrazbit

ASFN Icon
Joined
Oct 10, 2011
Posts
20,366
Reaction score
11,461
If he's playing under a QO then he has the right to void any trade. He has to be okay with wherever it is he gets traded to which would limit the Suns options for trading him.

And the options are pretty limitted from his end to, because even if there is some team he'd really want to get traded to, that team would need to have enough cap space next season to offer him a max deal as though he was not their free agent.

That line about a team who trades for him not getting his Bird Rights really complicates things for him. He would pretty much be forced to ride it out here on a crap one year deal and pray he stays healthy.

Unless Paul is dumber than even we are giving him credit for, Bledsoe is going to have to work out some sort of contract with the Suns.
 

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
556,146
Posts
5,433,869
Members
6,329
Latest member
cardinals2025
Top