When it comes to signing Amare to a max-like contract and fear of no contender after Nash retires, the better comparison would be Pierce before KG/Allen joined him, Pau Gasol on Grizz, McDyce on Nuggs, JONeal on Pacers, JJ in Atlanta and Bosh in Toronto, etc. Without injury, any of them would yield their teams very good assets if traded.
From the resale value point of view, the only risk for the Suns would be injury. It's up to the management to assess that properly to make a decision. Trust Kerr in that.
2011
Thunder
Durant, Westbrook, Harden, Thabo, FA big man, Green
This team will be dominating the west.
Youn honestly think Stoudemire (22/7 type big man) with Dragic, Clark, Lopez would be match to that team?
Clark can give it to Durant I think, in terms of "containing" him.
But the Suns are another all-star away from competing with that team.
You CANNOT have 20,22,23,24,25,26 million dollars committed to Stoudemire who is a 22-24 ppg 7-8 rpg game guy... with NO defense and NO one to feed him constantly.
If Nash was 3 years younger... or if the SUNS have Chris Paul or Deron Williams ready to replace Nash.. then I can understand having Stoudemire will be effective.
But Dragic is no Chris Paul nor Deron.... Dragic is a solid player, who can be a servicable starting point guard, his highest potential is to be a semi-star type.... not your "second star" type point guard.
As I mentioned, the SUNS shouldnt be looking at Stoudemire as long term... and I think Kerr and Sarver agrees as they are offering him a 3 year extension only.... this $110,000,000 rumour has to be sign and trade. As that money isnt fit for a team that has 1-2 seasons of having Nash playing his all-star self.
Don't bank on Stoudemire to be the Suns centerpiece in the long run... basically.
Start a new young team and nab that superstar in 2011 or 2012.