xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
I am a little surprised Indiana made this move. I don't think it's enough to get them into serious contention and he is not really a young player anymore.
But I am happy he is staying in the East.
Free agency next year should have zero to do with whether we trade him or not. Whether or not the trade gives us a better chance at winning should be all that matters. This team is currently all in on winning now and therefor we need to do what gives us the best chance right now.It is short term thinking. If he just leaves in free agency after we miss the playoffs or lose in the first round, you won't feel so much like it was a good idea to refuse to trade him.
The bird rights are what I was curious about. Looks like we can sign him to more than a minimum in the offseason and is big if we want to hold onto him.xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
What is interesting is he said he will test free agency and warned any team that trades for him he will not be giving up his free agency.To get a star player for essentially draft picks, and not good ones at that, I thought was a no-brainer for the Pacers. I like what they have done.
Birds rights isn't the problem. Because the Suns are so far over the cap? If they want flexibility bringing in the size of the contract might not be want the Suns want longer term. It will be interesting to say the least. I love what he has brought to the team.The bird rights are what I was curious about. Looks like we can sign him to more than a minimum in the offseason and is big if we want to hold onto him.
What is interesting is he said he will test free agency and warned any team that trades for him he will not be giving up his free agency.
Flex also said Nick Richardson - and he looks pretty interesting to me as a backup center.Saw this in Sports Illustrateds site. 4 trade targets for the Suns. Jonathan Kuminga (Warriors), Royce O'Neale (Nets), De'Andre Hunter (Hawks), and Ziaire Williams (Grizzlies). I'd be ecstatic with Kuminga and Hunter would be interesting. Royce wouldn't be awful, depending on cost, but I have no interest in Ziaire.
Four Updated Potential Trade Targets for Suns
The Suns reportedly have a top priority on the trade/buyout market - here's four targets to watch.www.si.com
Flex also said Nick Richardson - and he looks pretty interesting to me as a backup center.
Hunter is locked up at 20 million+ a year for the next 4 years. That pretty much means Grayson would be part of that deal, not sure about that one.
Ive also read there's a potential deal in the works sending PJ Tucker to Washington where he'd be bought out. He'd be eligible to sign here but I'm not sure who he'd replace. He'd be an upgrade over KBD and Yuta but he wouldn't improve things much.
In the playoffs I still think he could be useful defensively - maybe. Depends on the matchup.Ive also read there's a potential deal in the works sending PJ Tucker to Washington where he'd be bought out. He'd be eligible to sign here but I'm not sure who he'd replace. He'd be an upgrade over KBD and Yuta but he wouldn't improve things much.
I don't see the point of O'neal.Nick Richardson is ok.
I don't see Hunter coming here for salary reasons. O'Neale makes the most sense. Kuminga would need a 3rd team as I'm not sure what we have the Warriors would want. Grayson works but they don't need guard depth really.
FWIW, a trade involving someone like Damien Lee and Nassir Little for Royce O'Neale should work financially. That frees a roster spot, adds a bigger wing accustomed to playing a stretch 4 role, and the Nets might even bite since O'Neale is too old for their team, 30, and their season isn't going anywhere. They get younger with Little and we get a vet. Of course Lee can be swapped for other minimum guys we have like KBD, Yuta, or whoever but one needs to be included.
I wouldn't be thrilled to have Tucker back at this point in time except to upgrade Yuta or KBD.
The Suns have some trade exceptions available, particularly Dario Saric ($4,975,371) or Cam Payne ($6,500,000). However, they can't be combined.
I disagree because they are not winning now. If they were in the top 3 of the West, ok. They are fighting for a playoff spot with the play ins. We're not going to end up in the top 4 of the West. The best case for this team in the regular season is probably a 5th or 6th seed finish. Winning 3 rounds without home court, then a NBA title without one, again, very unlikely.Free agency next year should have zero to do with whether we trade him or not. Whether or not the trade gives us a better chance at winning should be all that matters. This team is currently all in on winning now and therefor we need to do what gives us the best chance right now.
The suns can’t use trade exceptions created from a prior year.
Winning a title is unlikely but not impossible, unless and until you start making moves for the future. And judging where we are right now makes little sense as we've rarely seen this team whole. That could very well remain the case all season and if so, we'll be lucky to make the playoffs. But we mortgaged much of our future to create this team with it's built in expiration date - so as long as we have even a remote chance of winning it all, every decision we make has to be designed to make us better right now.I disagree because they are not winning now. If they were in the top 3 of the West, ok. They are fighting for a playoff spot with the play ins. We're not going to end up in the top 4 of the West. The best case for this team in the regular season is probably a 5th or 6th seed finish. Winning 3 rounds without home court, then a NBA title without one, again, very unlikely.
The other thing - Beal and Book are SGs match up wise. Sure Book has some PG skill so does Beal. They can make plays. Match up wise though, you basically have three SGs in Allen, Book, Beal. When you then face teams who have some quick PGs or a big SF, you're in match up hell in the playoffs.
Can't be done. Cannot combine salaries to match the incoming player salary. We can only trade Allen for him. That's the problem.