Admitting that it can be debated and admitting that he sucks is two different things.
Exactly. It can't be debated. He sucks. He sucks, he sucks he sucks he sucks he sucks. Period.
I think Clancy did well here.
As this is your opinion on Clancy, I'm actually glad you're critical of Whis. Makes me even more sure that I stand by him.
As was pointed out before by Duckjake, the total "rank" is complete BS from 2008. I look at the results.
Hilarious. Let's pretend like those three games didn't even happen. Hell, let's take 3 of the Lakers wins vs the Suns in the playoffs out, damn we kicked their asses! THESE GAMES HAPPENED. While they were significantly worse than the other games, every team can make the same excuses.
The most important thing Duck said, which clearly you missed, was the only statistic that matters: Total points allowed. Pendy's defenses sucked out loud in terms of that. "The Cards ranked 26th in points allowed in '05, 29th in '06, 27th in '07 and 28th in '08. That is not good defense."
I think Whisenhunt's choice Billy Davis has been a failure now with two franchises, experiencing absolutely zero success. That can't be argued, and that guy was hand picked by Kenny....A guy fired for failing to adapt to the 3-4 with SF was picked by Whizenator to be the DC. Just let that sink in.
It's impossible to discuss this in a rational manner with a person who just doesn't listen. First, Whis's choice was obviously Kevin Butler, this isn't an opinion, this is fact. Second, neither you, nor I, nor anyone here knows that Bill Davis was hand picked by Whis, or even in his top 3. These things don't happen in a vacuum, and your blaming of Whis for everything shows no objectivity.