chickenhead
Registered User
- Joined
- Jul 7, 2004
- Posts
- 3,109
- Reaction score
- 77
Using stats to try to make definitive comparisons across eras presents a fallacy because, as other have pointed out, those stats were not earned against the same competition and often with different rules and officiating. Awards and that sort of thing are even less definitive.
With teams it's a little easier, I think. My take is that the Celtics and the Lakers would do pretty well against the best teams of today, and that's because I think they'd be better able to systematically break down other teams' game plans. Even a team like the Spurs that has had the same ability: I just don't think they have an answer for the Celtics front court. If Duncan is handling Parish, can the other forwards handle Bird and McHale? And on the other end, are you suddenly relying on a "defensive specialist" Bowen to score while his teammates are wrapped up?
However, I do think it's likely that some mediocre teams from today could beat mediocre teams from the 80s because some of today's stars could light it up with pure athleticism (unless the hard fouls and different officiating were used to take them out of the game).
With teams it's a little easier, I think. My take is that the Celtics and the Lakers would do pretty well against the best teams of today, and that's because I think they'd be better able to systematically break down other teams' game plans. Even a team like the Spurs that has had the same ability: I just don't think they have an answer for the Celtics front court. If Duncan is handling Parish, can the other forwards handle Bird and McHale? And on the other end, are you suddenly relying on a "defensive specialist" Bowen to score while his teammates are wrapped up?
However, I do think it's likely that some mediocre teams from today could beat mediocre teams from the 80s because some of today's stars could light it up with pure athleticism (unless the hard fouls and different officiating were used to take them out of the game).