red desert
ASFN Addict
Look, red, you can smack down any questions about Austin that you want, but I'd like to hear an affirmative case for him that takes these question marks into account. Yes, his wiggle is impressive, but--especially for a wide receiver in the NFL--those kinds of spaces are few and far between in the NFL, even in the kicking game.
I totally agree with you that when Tavon Austin gets the ball with no one within four or five yards of him, he can be a special player. But that doesn't happen often in the NFL. That being the case, then you have to ask how he can perform in a down-by-down situation. Can he make the catch in traffic? I haven't seen it. Can he go over the middle? I have no idea.
If you believe that Tavon Austin has no parallel in the history of the NFL, then at least make that provision and admit that there's a tremendous risk to drafting a prospect very high that hasn't been shown to have a role that justifies that draft position.
You point to all these players that have busted on the OL and other positions (and I wasn't in favor of drafting Wendell Bryant in the first place, and it's come out that he had off-the-field problems that lead to his poor performance), but you haven't said that wide receivers are tremendously risky high in the draft, particularly wideouts who lack ideal size for the position.
There is perhaps no greater truism in the NFL draft process than the statement that wide receivers are tremendously risky propositions, particularly those drafted high, and particularly to those of a smaller stature. Absolute truth. I don't know that I've said otherwise. I simply believe his upside is worth the risk. That's all. And yes, I do believe Austin has shown he can catch the ball in traffic and go over the middle.
Again, when I see him I see greatness. And then I hear guys who do this for a living absolutely gush about the possibilities with this guy... tells me my eyes are not betraying me. Mayock, Cosell, Kiper, Baldinger, ALL gush about his potential and all, to a man, would not have a problem with him being taken in the top ten, imo.
I get we have other needs. I do. And the Cards do in fact have those needs. But I would still take him. Do I expect the Cards to take him? No. Not out of the question, but probably not. I think our pick will be Warmack. Which is fine. I would just rather have us pick Austin.
That's all I'm saying really. My fear is that either SF or St. Louis take him and he turns out to be an immediate star in the league.
Last edited: