That's the truth, Gambo is always mixing metaphors.:gambo:
That's the truth, Gambo is always mixing metaphors.:gambo:
This is of course true, and it's also true that hindsight is always laser-perfect 20/20... However, when I look back over the last 3 years or so, who have the Cards lost that anyone can say had we not lost him/them, we'd have our championship? Granted, this upcoming year might be different given that we lost true studs like Q and Dansby... we'll have to see how those losses really impact the team. But up to this point, have the Cards suffered greatly for not being able to re-sign players?? Seems to me they are doing a tremendous job in filling holes via draft and FA.
I didn't know Pace could play in the secondary... The Cardinals put as much pressure on Rothlisberger as any team had that entire season. But, DRC made some mistakes, and Francisco's coverage was horrible in that game.I think that with Calvin Pace instead of Chike Okeafor in the Super Bowl, we probably would have won.
Rice leaving wasn't about talent evaluation. He made himself toxic to the organization.Especially considering that teams have taken advantage of the Cards misunderestimation of their own talent for years: Simeon Rice, Kyle Vanden Bosch, Renaldo Hill, Corey Chavous, Calvin Pace. Shoot, we would have been better off giving that $10 million to Rod Hood instead of Bryant McFadden.
Same money, yes, but same contract, no. Sure the total value of the contracts were the same but we were far off in total money paid out in the first 1,2,3 years of the deal in comparison to NYG and MIA. Our guaranteed money offered and 1st 3 years of the contract total was about 25% less then what they eventual got.
If DD isn't resigned than I just quit.Thats beyond stupid.
You won't get much argument on that!If DD isn't resigned than I just quit.Thats beyond stupid.
Comparing Randy Moss to Kerry Rhodes? LOL.
It wouldn't be so far fetched to say Rhodes was once the best free safety in the game. I wasn't comparing them on the talent level anyway.
I didn't know Pace could play in the secondary... The Cardinals put as much pressure on Rothlisberger as any team had that entire season. But, DRC made some mistakes, and Francisco's coverage was horrible in that game.
Rice leaving wasn't about talent evaluation. He made himself toxic to the organization.
KVB - multiple serious injuries, the Titans took a low risk chance on him and it worked out.
Hill - Frankly, I don't remember the details.
Chavous - failed at corner, refused to switch to safety, Went else where and played safety.
Pace - Overpaid, at the time, by the Jets.
Hood - I agree!
I also forgot Leonard Davis and Thomas Jones. You could probably add in Jake Plummer, too, since he lead the Broncos to the playoffs once or twice and had a 4000+ yard passing season in 2004.
Yes, it would. No one who actually watched football on Sundays would say that. Rhodes was maybe the best safety in his division, but he never came close to Polumalu, Reed, Dawkins, Sanders, Wilson, and even Darren Sharper when he was with the Vikings.
I guess there's no reason Rhodes shouldn't be all-pro this season then. People sure are on the Kerry Rhodes bandwagon. Why, i have no idea . I guess he had one decent year about 4 yeras ago. That means nothing. Carlos Quentin almost won league MVP for the White Sox in 2008 and now can't hit .200. I just hope Rhodes isn't as bad as Terence Holt.Rhodes was an amazing safety and the most underrated one back in 06-07. His name isn't as big as those four but his play was most definately up there. He could blitz, cover TEs, play zone, stop the run and never gave up big plays.
Why even mention Darren Sharper? He has always been horrible in all areas outside of being a ballhawk.
I just hope Rhodes isn't as bad as Terence Holt.
Seriously ? I mean realize how bad T.Holt is. If that is the case then Matt Ware will be starting by the end of camp. Cause Rashad Johnson could beat out T.Holt. Robert Griffith can come off the golf course and beat out T. Holt.
In Rhodes defense, and this would be the extent that I will defend the guy. Saying he has only had one good year, would be the logic that teams have used on players like Calvin Pace, or Antonio Smith in the past.
Rhodes was an amazing safety and the most underrated one back in 06-07. His name isn't as big as those four but his play was most definately up there. He could blitz, cover TEs, play zone, stop the run and never gave up big plays.
Why even mention Darren Sharper? He has always been horrible in all areas outside of being a ballhawk.
There are plenty of reasons Rhodes shouldn't be all-pro this season (like injuries, outstanding safeties on other teams, losing more of his mojo etc.)I guess there's no reason Rhodes shouldn't be all-pro this season then.
I guess there's no reason Rhodes shouldn't be all-pro this season then. People sure are on the Kerry Rhodes bandwagon. Why, i have no idea . I guess he had one decent year about 4 yeras ago. That means nothing. Carlos Quentin almost won league MVP for the White Sox in 2008 and now can't hit .200. I just hope Rhodes isn't as bad as Terence Holt.
There must be another Kerry Rhodes because you are not talking about the Kerry Rhodes, formally of the Jets, currently a Cardinal.
In three years of starting he has only given up 3 total TD's and rarely if ever beaten deep giving up an average of 11.0 and 8.7 yards per catch each of the last two years. He without a shadow of a doubt did not just have one decent (and it was way more then just decent by the way) season 4 years ago, he has been consistently good his whole career.
Please who ever brought up Darren Sharper just hasn't been paying attention to how the guy plays. Bringing up Sharper is a clear cut case of just naming guys with names to see who sticks. For all the INT's he gets he gives up way more TD's and long balls. Giving up a career yards per reception average of over 18 yards a catch. The guy is one of the most overrated D players to ever be in the league, but since people only focus on the sexy stats like sacks and INT's they usually cant see the forest through the tree's on the player if they have those sexy stats. He has so many INT's because teams throw at him at will because they know they will get huge gains on him more times then not.
There must be another Kerry Rhodes because you are not talking about the Kerry Rhodes, formally of the Jets, currently a Cardinal.
In three years of starting he has only given up 3 total TD's and rarely if ever beaten deep giving up an average of 11.0 and 8.7 yards per catch each of the last two years. He without a shadow of a doubt did not just have one decent (and it was way more then just decent by the way) season 4 years ago, he has been consistently good his whole career.
Please who ever brought up Darren Sharper just hasn't been paying attention to how the guy plays. Bringing up Sharper is a clear cut case of just naming guys with names to see who sticks. For all the INT's he gets he gives up way more TD's and long balls. Giving up a career yards per reception average of over 18 yards a catch. The guy is one of the most overrated D players to ever be in the league, but since people only focus on the sexy stats like sacks and INT's they usually cant see the forest through the tree's on the player if they have those sexy stats. He has so many INT's because teams throw at him at will because they know they will get huge gains on him more times then not.
There must be another Kerry Rhodes because you are not talking about the Kerry Rhodes, formally of the Jets, currently a Cardinal.
In three years of starting he has only given up 3 total TD's and rarely if ever beaten deep giving up an average of 11.0 and 8.7 yards per catch each of the last two years. He without a shadow of a doubt did not just have one decent (and it was way more then just decent by the way) season 4 years ago, he has been consistently good his whole career.
Please who ever brought up Darren Sharper just hasn't been paying attention to how the guy plays. Bringing up Sharper is a clear cut case of just naming guys with names to see who sticks. For all the INT's he gets he gives up way more TD's and long balls. Giving up a career yards per reception average of over 18 yards a catch. The guy is one of the most overrated D players to ever be in the league, but since people only focus on the sexy stats like sacks and INT's they usually cant see the forest through the tree's on the player if they have those sexy stats. He has so many INT's because teams throw at him at will because they know they will get huge gains on him more times then not.
No, i'm talking about the same Kerry Rhodes. I went back and looked at his 2007/2008 years and took a look at the QB's he played aginst those 2 years. I noticed a not too distinguished list he put up those "numbers against. However when they faced a good QB, the Jets defense tended to get lit up.There must be another Kerry Rhodes because you are not talking about the Kerry Rhodes, formally of the Jets, currently a Cardinal.
In three years of starting he has only given up 3 total TD's and rarely if ever beaten deep giving up an average of 11.0 and 8.7 yards per catch each of the last two years. He without a shadow of a doubt did not just have one decent (and it was way more then just decent by the way) season 4 years ago, he has been consistently good his whole career.
Please who ever brought up Darren Sharper just hasn't been paying attention to how the guy plays. Bringing up Sharper is a clear cut case of just naming guys with names to see who sticks. For all the INT's he gets he gives up way more TD's and long balls. Giving up a career yards per reception average of over 18 yards a catch. The guy is one of the most overrated D players to ever be in the league, but since people only focus on the sexy stats like sacks and INT's they usually cant see the forest through the tree's on the player if they have those sexy stats. He has so many INT's because teams throw at him at will because they know they will get huge gains on him more times then not.
No kidding!It's hacky stat.