wilycoyote24
All Star
AntSports Steve said:If he has more than 1 year left, he might not get cut until after June 1st.
Why exactly is this?
AntSports Steve said:If he has more than 1 year left, he might not get cut until after June 1st.
HookemCards said:Hey Joe,
Any way you could put the years remaining on the contract on your spreadsheet, would be helpful in determining cap hits of players. Awesome job though, another reason I love this board, posters like you (and many others) going the extra mile.
DEAD CAP SPACE/Misc. $7,272,250
Minus estimated rookie cap: $4,000,000
TOTAL ESTIMATED CAP SPACE: $5,464,000
Redsz said:Ouch! Someone please tell me that we will actually be able to use this money next year?!
So, we still have 5 mil avaliable? Or does that 5 mil include the rookie cap?
Cards Czar said:Joe or Steve who are the persons on the list. I know Starks is but who are the rest to make up the 7 million??
It would be cool to see the list and there costs.
Civilian, he who used to formally known as Navy Mike
HookemCards said:Hey Joe,
Any way you could put the years remaining on the contract on your spreadsheet, would be helpful in determining cap hits of players. Awesome job though, another reason I love this board, posters like you (and many others) going the extra mile.
This year, only 12 teams took a hit against the salary cap for incentives earned from the 2004 season. The Steelers won 15 games and took the biggest shot to the cap with $5.4 million in charges -- that's the price of winning, I suppose. Meanwhile, three teams (Buffalo, Arizona and Cincinnati) had no ill effects from bonuses earned that had not counted during the season, effectively giving them a "balanced budget."
Thanks Joeshmo, I had read that article and thought that what Ant had said earlier was wrong. And that would have made our cap for the insentives less. Good work as always.joeshmo said:I have changed the Deadcap/Misc amount becuase I included a 2 mill. buffer for incentives or bonuses that were earned that we just dont know about or could ever find out about. I was being on the side of caution and putting a worst case scenerio cap number.
But I found an article taht made me change my mind and here is just the part that applies to our cap but read the whole thing about a loop hole that Minny has taken advantage of and a look at some bargian RFA.
http://nfl.com/news/story/8279387
So I took away 2 mill buffer I was using from the deadcap/misc fund. and added it back to the cap space left fund.
AntSports Steve said:What Min used in 2004 to create $7M of extra cap space in 2005 was called the "Philly Loophole" as they were the 1st team that popularized it. Orignally when that loophole was first published, I thought the NFL would clamp down on it and review contracts extras that exist only to move money to future years. But, with 17 teams now taking advantage of the loophole it must be considered part of the salary cap game. I mean, one RFA type low paid player has a likely-to-be-earned incentive of $7M. If that doesn't standout, nothing will.
The last 2 years, the Cards could have used this loophole but didn't. At least they did rework some deals to more bonus into current years to same some money for this year.
Two years ago the remaining cap space was used to extent LJ and Raynoch and to remove some future bonuses on Leonard Davis' contract. They tried the same this october, but failed because the couldn't reach an agreement with Wilson and because the NFL annulled both Zellner and Hambrick's contracts.ThunderCard said:I really wish we would have done a better job over the last two years with the loophole, but oh well. We could have enough cap space right now for James, Hartwell, and Boldin. Were we 9+ million under last year and another 8-9 the year before if I am not mistaken ??
ThunderCard said:I really wish we would have done a better job over the last two years with the loophole, but oh well. We could have enough cap space right now for James, Hartwell, and Boldin. Were we 9+ million under last year and another 8-9 the year before if I am not mistaken ??
BACH said:Wasn't Hambrick's contract reported to be a two-year $1.6M deal. that would make his SB $260,000