Chance to start draws in Warner
Cards give QB 1 year, $4 mil
Kent Somers
The Arizona Republic
Mar. 7, 2005 12:00 AM
[font=arial,helvetica,sans-serif]Kurt Warner wanted a chance at a starting job and a multiyear contract. From the Cardinals, he received one of the two.
Warner agreed to terms Sunday on a one-year contract worth $4 million, including a $2 million signing bonus. He's expected he'll replace Josh McCown as the starting quarterback. Coach Dennis Green wasn't available for comment Sunday, but he isn't in the habit of signing free agents to become backups.
Warner was home in New Jersey Sunday and is expected to arrive in Arizona on Tuesday to sign the contract and hold a news conference. [/font]
[font=arial,helvetica,sans-serif]
You must be registered for see images
OAS_AD('BoxAd')
You must be registered for see images
[/font]
[font=arial,helvetica,sans-serif]
"Even though this is a one-year deal, I really don't want to go anywhere else and would like nothing more than to end my career by helping the Cardinals win a championship," Warner said in the team's press release.
Warner, who visited Chicago Friday, canceled a trip to Detroit Sunday.
Warner, 33, was the team's top choice at quarterback in free agency, and club officials and his agent, Mark Bartelstein, discussed a multiyear contract. The Cardinals were unwilling to make a large, long-term financial commitment to Warner, so the parties settled upon a one-year deal.
"We agreed that the first objective was to get Kurt under contract. We felt like that was where he wanted to be," said Rod Graves, the team's vice president of football operations.
If Warner performs well, the Cardinals are willing to commit to a long-term contract, Graves said.
The Cardinals have four quarterbacks under contract, and Warner's signing likely means the departure of Shaun King, who served as a backup to McCown for most of last season. John Navarre is expected to be the third quarterback.
McCown declined comment Sunday, saying he'll speak with reporters Tuesday.
In a statement, Green called Warner's impending signing "exciting."
"He's proven he's one of the best competitors in the National Football League, regardless of position," Green said, "and is one of the bravest quarterbacks ever to play the position. We coached against him in the past and have a clear understanding of how much he wants to win."
It's questionable, however, how much Warner has left. In the past two seasons, he's lost the starting job with two teams, St. Louis and the New York Giants.
While in St. Louis, Warner twice was the NFL's MVP, but he's taken a long fall since. In 2003, he was benched after fumbling six times in a season-opening loss to the Giants.
Last year, he was benched by the Giants after the ninth game, which was, coincidentally, a 17-14 loss to the Cardinals.
He was criticized for hanging on to the ball too long. He was sacked six times against the Cardinals and 24 times in his past four starts.
But when reviewing tape of Warner, the Cardinals saw enough to give them hope. Their offense is similar to the one Warner operated in St. Louis, and Graves thinks Warner's experience and maturity will benefit McCown and Navarre.
"When we sat back and studied what has gone on with him the last couple years, we felt like there is certain ability and talent still left there," Graves said. "It just puts us in a more comfortable position knowing we have someone who is familiar with this offense."
Warner has suggested he wasn't benched because of performance. In New York, there was a young quarterback, Eli Manning, waiting to take over. And in St. Louis, there were extenuating circumstances, Warner said.
"The media has made so many determinations on what's wrong with me and why I'm not in St. Louis anymore," Warner said during his visit to Arizona last week. "And nobody knows the whole story. It's not something I'm going to talk about. But I know that the reason I'm not in St. Louis is not because I can't play this football game. It didn't have anything to do with my skills diminishing."
http://www.azcentral.com/sports/cardinals/articles/0307cards0307.html
[/font]
[font=arial,helvetica,sans-serif][/font]
[font=arial,helvetica,sans-serif]I wonder why he wanted to sign here enough to cancel his trip to Detroit with Green's refusal to give him a long-term contract. Was the money better than what he could have gotten elsewhere? Or does he erroneously
agree with the vast majority of this board and think that McCown will be easy work in camp, easier than the wildly unpopular Harrington?[/font]