Who Starts Week 1 at Wide Receiver?

[Stout]

I was high on him during last year’s draft process. That’s not having low standards, that’s just how highly I think of him.

Not one iota? There has been flashes.

Then why did you “fixed” Brit’s post to the exact opposite? lol like huh?

Im not sure how he’s not “decent” right now, but I guess.

Flashes, absolutely. I agree. Flashes doesn't equate to guaranteed. Brit is absolutely convinced there is zero chance he's not already a good #2. Like, how can anyone have any doubt certain. Thus fixing.

He's a decent player. We don't know if he's a decent #2 starter on a team trying to compete yet. I hope we're trying to compete. We are, right?

 

[Ouchie-Z-Clown]

K9 asked the question. I was responding.

Why are you so pretentious?

I don’t think you’re using that word correctly.

 

[Mulli]

I don’t think you’re using that word correctly.

You missed the joke

 

[iLLmatiC]

When is the draft again?

Draft ain’t saving this board, it’s going to be the same back and forth post draft too lol.

 

[Mulli]

Draft ain’t saving this board, it’s going to be the same back and forth post draft too lol.

Truth

 

[oaken1]

Draft ain’t saving this board, it’s going to be the same back and forth post draft too lol.

But at least it will be back and forth over things that have actually happened.

That beats the snot out of constant arguing over what might happen

 

[iLLmatiC]

But at least it will be back and forth over things that have actually happened.

That beats the snot out of constant arguing over what might happen

You don’t think there’s going to be rehashing on who the Cardinal’s could’ve drafted?

 

[Ouchie-Z-Clown]

You missed the joke

I think you misused that word too.

 

[Ouchie-Z-Clown]

But at least it will be back and forth over things that have actually happened.

That beats the snot out of constant arguing over what might happen

AMEN

 

[Cbus cardsfan]

Draft ain’t saving this board, it’s going to be the same back and forth post draft too lol.

I agree. Can’t wait for Monti passing on Marvin for a “haul”

 

[Chopper0080]

Was Hakeem Butler just a stiff? 6’6” might actually be too big for an NFL WR except for true freaks?

He was on a roster with Pittsburgh last year, who seemed to be trying him at TE. Hasn’t played in a game since 2020 tho.

Bruh...UFL and last year XFL dude. Great athlete. Can only win with size and speed. No nuance to his game.

 

[SECTION 11]

I've changed my mind on this one.
I think we are trading down. For three reasons, in order;
1) Because Odunze is going to be ahead of MHJ on their draft board. I believe JG when he says he looking for killers. If ice sculpture was on the combine agenda, Odunze would have brought a chainsaw. And Cbus, if you hated that, here's an even worse analogy: I think Odunze would cream MHJ in the octagon.
2) Do we know for sure that MHJ is healthy? No bowl game, no combine, no pro day. This bugs me. Success in drafting Fitzgerald at #3 takes some of the sting off of drafting Wadsworth at #3, but not all of it.
3) Picks. MO made five trades in his first draft and got almost all A's from the pundits. I'm not sure what the logic is for ditching that wave right when it barrels.

 

[daves]

1) Because Odunze is going to be ahead of MHJ on their draft board. I believe JG when he says he looking for killers

Doesn't the advantage go to Harrison Jr. on that count? He's a legacy! (Allegedly!)

 

[SECTION 11]

Doesn't the advantage go to Harrison Jr. on that count? He's a legacy! (Allegedly!)

Hmmm good point.

 

[Mulli]

No.

 

[SECTION 11]

No.

Boooo.

 

[BritCard]

Flashes, absolutely. I agree. Flashes doesn't equate to guaranteed. Brit is absolutely convinced there is zero chance he's not already a good #2. Like, how can anyone have any doubt certain. Thus fixing.

He's a decent player. We don't know if he's a decent #2 starter on a team trying to compete yet. I hope we're trying to compete. We are, right?

I think he's shown enough that we don't need to bring in anyone else.

95 yards vs Seahawks, 56 vs the Giants, 86 vs the Cowboys, 76 vs the Niners, 62 vs the Rams and 58 vs the Ravens as a rookie is more than enough to see he can be at least a good #2. All but one of them with Josh Dobbs and 4 of them top 10 defenses.

 

[Stout]

I think he's shown enough that we don't need to bring in anyone else.

95 yards vs Seahawks, 56 vs the Giants, 86 vs the Cowboys, 76 vs the Niners, 62 vs the Rams and 58 vs the Ravens as a rookie is more than enough to see he can be at least a good #2. All but one of them with Josh Dobbs and 4 of them top 10 defenses.

Hey, I hope you're right. That would be huge for the eam.

If we already had an established vet #1, I'd feel a lot better rolling with Wilson as #2. Right now, however, we have Wilson #1 and Dortch #2 in the WR room. That's absolutely shambolic. We are in desperate need of a veteran presence on top of a top WR. Dortch as your veteran presence and guidance in that WR room just isn't good enough. I don't want to hear about Pascal and the bottom feeder vets either--they are roster fillers and nothing else.

 

[DVontel]

We are in desperate need of a veteran presence

Why are we in desperate need of veteran presence?

Why are we in need of veteran presence at all?

 

[Stout]

Why are we in desperate need of veteran presence?

Why are we in need of veteran presence at all?

This isn't even a serious question, right? Because rolling without solid leadership in the room is a good idea, right? Do better here, man. Please.

 

[kerouac9]

Why are we in desperate need of veteran presence?

Why are we in need of veteran presence at all?

What is the point of Zach Pascal then?

 

[Mulli]

What is the point of Zach Pascal then?

That is not very nice. He is a human being.

 

[Stout]

What is the point of Zach Pascal then?

Is there one?

 

[Stout]

That is not very nice. He is a human being.

You must be registered for see images attach

 

[DVontel]

This isn't even a serious question, right? Because rolling without solid leadership in the room is a good idea, right? Do better here, man. Please.

Zach Pascal pretty much fits your definition of a veteran presence, but you don’t want to hear about him so I’m confused here. Please name me a FA WR that Monti should bring here that would fit your definition.