Worst case scenerio Mock Draft: Ingram, Floyd, Reiff, DeCastro, Keuchly gone by #13

Lomax to Green 84

Hall of Famer
Joined
May 15, 2002
Posts
1,419
Reaction score
631
Location
Illinois
#1-Indianapolis (Andrew Luck)

#2-Washington (Robert Griffin III)

#3-Minnesota (Matt Kalil)

#4-Cleveland (Trent Richardson)

#5-Tampa Bay (Morris Claiborne)

#6-St. Louis (Justin Blackmon)

#7-Jacksonville (Melvin Ingram)

#8-Miami (Ryan Tannehill)

#9-Carolina (Michael Floyd-Gives Newton another bigtime target opposite Steve Smith)

#10-Buffalo (Riley Reiff-Bell is gone, paid huge money to Fitzpatrick last year, need to protect your QB investment)

#11-Kansas City (David DeCastro-Kansas City has alot of New England influence in the front office. DeCastro is a smart, scheme diverse Offensive Guard. The Chiefs pride themselves on running the ball and controlling the clock. Led the league in rushing in 2010, but slipped last year. DeCastro is a perfect fit.)

#12-Seattle-Luke Keuchly (Perfect fit in Seattle's defense. Seahawks have been looking for a defensive leader at linebacker for a long time.)

#13-Arizona-??????? Quite a few here would be ok with Cordy Glenn. I really respect the opinions of Charley Casserly and Mike Mayock. Both see Glenn as a Late 1st and more likely a 2nd round value. Would be a huge reach here at #13. Trading down would be the #1 choice, but if no trade down is available I am predicting a bit of a curveball here: South Carolina CB Stephon Gilmore. Would give Arizona a terrific group of corners and allows Horton to be even more daring with blitz packages.
 

imaCafan

Next stop, Hall of Fame!
Joined
Aug 24, 2002
Posts
3,610
Reaction score
948
Location
Needles, Ca.
#13-Arizona-??????? Quite a few here would be ok with Cordy Glenn. I really respect the opinions of Charley Casserly and Mike Mayock. Both see Glenn as a Late 1st and more likely a 2nd round value. Would be a huge reach here at #13. Trading down would be the #1 choice, but if no trade down is available I am predicting a bit of a curveball here: South Carolina CB Stephon Gilmore. Would give Arizona a terrific group of corners and allows Horton to be even more daring with blitz packages.

Gilmore over Kirkpatrick???? Or maybe Barron, we will need to replace AW soon....
 
Last edited:

Vermont Maverick

Registered
Joined
Apr 24, 2006
Posts
1,861
Reaction score
181
Location
Williston, Vermont
I would not like this draft...

Unfortunately, this is the Cordy Glenn scenario.

Gilmore maybe. Coples? (I know he doesn't fit, but use him as a pass rusher). Might have to go Fletcher Cox (I know we don't need him, but BPA) (And I would hate this too, because it would likely spell the end of Calais. Upshaw or Marcellis? I don't think we are going Barron. Wilson has at least 2 good years left.
 

WildBB

Yogi n da Bear
Joined
Mar 20, 2004
Posts
14,295
Reaction score
1,239
Location
The Sonoran Jungle - West
Gilmore over Kirkpatrick???? Or maybe Barron, we will need to replace AW soon....

Gilmore was a vocal leader on the GC D. He doesn't have the issues DK has with pot. He's a student of the game. He's got some height. He's a very decent cover corner.

It's a passing league. The really good teams are for the most part anyway.


I'd rather have Jefferson, Toler and Gay competing as the 3rd and 4th CB's. Or at least have Gilmore waiting in the wings, soon to take over the spot opposite PP.

They could do much worse, imo. Much better value than Glenn there, for sure.
 

Duckjake

LEGACY MEMBER
LEGACY MEMBER
Joined
Jun 10, 2002
Posts
32,190
Reaction score
317
Location
Texas
I would not like this draft...

Unfortunately, this is the Cordy Glenn scenario.

Gilmore maybe. Coples? (I know he doesn't fit, but use him as a pass rusher). Might have to go Fletcher Cox (I know we don't need him, but BPA) (And I would hate this too, because it would likely spell the end of Calais. Upshaw or Marcellis? I don't think we are going Barron. Wilson has at least 2 good years left.

I like both those guys for us. Also Gilmore or Kendall Wright. Not too enamored with Cordy Glenn but he wouldn't be too bad either. I just don't see how this draft can go bad for us before we pick. There doesn't appear to be many superstars but an awful lot of very solid football players in this class. Not a bad year to have a pick like #13. Oh yeah, don't forget 13 is the Cards lucky number.
 

football karma

Michael snuggles the cap space
Joined
Jul 22, 2002
Posts
15,236
Reaction score
14,266
K Wright WR
Poe or Brocker DT
Cox DT/DE
Perry DE
Upshaw or Branch OLB
Hightower ILB

It's not the worst "worst case" group to choose from

I would add Steven Hill, WR to that group as well, along with Gilmore

The draft should be interesting-- one thing I read/noticed is that there seems to be a variety of rankings within position groups across teams.

Ingram, Upshaw, Perry, et all -- diff teams have those guys in diff orders

Blackmon, Floyd,---- Wright, Hill, Randal: diff teams have the top two, and then the rest in diff order

Reiff, Adams, Glenn -- again, diff of opinion who belongs after Kahlil and where.
 

Pariah

H.S.
Supporting Member
Joined
Feb 3, 2003
Posts
35,345
Reaction score
18
Location
The Aventine
I don't se Ingram going before Coples. I think if a team like Jacksonville needs a pass rusher, that's their guy. Ingram will be taken by a 3-4 team, IMO.

Also, if this goes down like this, there's going to be the option to move back because Coples is still there, IMO. And I'd jump on it to move into a position to get a second rd selection back and hopefully still be in a position to draft Glenn or Hightower.
 

Lagerfilled

Professional Tailgater
Joined
Mar 23, 2004
Posts
1,578
Reaction score
785
Location
Amen Corner
In this case it would be Glenn or Upshaw, just not sure what order the Cards brass would have them ranked. I suppose the BPA plus need would push Glenn higher. That's of course assuming the Cards have him graded higher than Upshaw. We'll see in a couple of weeks.

I think Upshaw intrigues because he's just a flat out good football player. Not a flashy 12 sack guy, but it gives us the flexibility to move Acho to the weak side.
 

1DS

Registered
Joined
May 12, 2005
Posts
1,147
Reaction score
0
Location
Maryland
I'd take Barron under thisnscenario, no question. He is, by far, the best player left, and he fills a semi need. Wilson has started to become injury prone, and likely has 1-2 years left here.

Horton like to run a lot of 3 Saftey formations. I'm sure he could find a way to get Barron lots of playing time and have him make a significant contribution. Maybe allow Wilson to be a hybrid SS/LBer on occasions and have Barron come in to play SS. Can Barron play the FS position also? I think he could.
 

Duckjake

LEGACY MEMBER
LEGACY MEMBER
Joined
Jun 10, 2002
Posts
32,190
Reaction score
317
Location
Texas
I'd take Barron under thisnscenario, no question. He is, by far, the best player left, and he fills a semi need. Wilson has started to become injury prone, and likely has 1-2 years left here.

Horton like to run a lot of 3 Saftey formations. I'm sure he could find a way to get Barron lots of playing time and have him make a significant contribution. Maybe allow Wilson to be a hybrid SS/LBer on occasions and have Barron come in to play SS. Can Barron play the FS position also? I think he could.

Gilmore would be better. We can use another Corner more than another Safety and:
Gilmore has experience in a few spots in the secondary and played some at a hybrid safety/cornerback spot. He should be best in the NFL in a zone scheme
 

Cardiac

ASFN Icon
Joined
Jul 21, 2002
Posts
12,061
Reaction score
3,327
If no trade down options then at this time my priority list is:

Cox DT/DE
Brockers DT/DE
Gilmore CB
Hill WR

Why the D-line? Well they would be the #1 prospect at their position since none have been taken yet.

The Giants have won 2 SB's in the past 4 years and their D-line was a major reason why.

I don't share the fear of several that drafting D-line means the end of CC in Az. The cost of a rookie at the 13th pick is not a CAP breaker by any means.

DD current contract ends before the rookie DE will so tons of time and options to make it work.

It usually takes 2 to 3 years for a DT/ 3-4 DE to adapt to the NFL game.

Whiz loves his D-line as much as he appears to hate drafting O-lineman :) One 1st rd and two 2nd rd picks taken on the D-line in 5 years against one 1st rd O-lineman. The mid/late rd picks are fairly even in number of picks invested on the respective lines.
 
OP
OP
Lomax to Green 84

Lomax to Green 84

Hall of Famer
Joined
May 15, 2002
Posts
1,419
Reaction score
631
Location
Illinois
Courtney Upshaw may be alot higher on the Cards board than many of us think. Upshaw is just a football player. His style is not Von Milleresque but neither is Sam Acho's and look what Acho did in Horton's defense.

Upshaw is my favorite player in the the entire draft. I just see him as a 6-10 sack per year guy and great versus the run. He will never be a DeMarcus Ware of Von Miller type of pass rushing terror, but he will have a very productive NFL career.

I don't think Upshaw is the Cards top choice. My guess is he would be option 4 or 5 after Reiff, DeCastro, Ingram, and probably Floyd. He may come into play if these guys are all gone, however.
 

Dayman

ASFN Addict
Joined
Dec 27, 2008
Posts
6,104
Reaction score
7,918
Location
Portland, Oregon
I would go with either Gilmore or Upshaw, although I really don't see Tannenhill falling this far. Gilmore would likely be my eventual choice. Although using a first round pick on a corner for the third time in five years is highly unusual, Gilmore is too talented and fits this system too well to pass on him for other available players in this scenario.
 

az jam

ASFN Icon
Joined
Mar 6, 2004
Posts
12,988
Reaction score
5,208
Location
Scottsdale, AZ
My choices would be: OG/OT Cordy Glenn, DE Quinton Coples, DT Fletcher Cox & SS Mark Barron.
 

WildBB

Yogi n da Bear
Joined
Mar 20, 2004
Posts
14,295
Reaction score
1,239
Location
The Sonoran Jungle - West
If no trade down options then at this time my priority list is:

Cox DT/DE
Brockers DT/DE
Gilmore CB
Hill WR

Why the D-line? Well they would be the #1 prospect at their position since none have been taken yet.

The Giants have won 2 SB's in the past 4 years and their D-line was a major reason why.

I don't share the fear of several that drafting D-line means the end of CC in Az. The cost of a rookie at the 13th pick is not a CAP breaker by any means.

DD current contract ends before the rookie DE will so tons of time and options to make it work.

It usually takes 2 to 3 years for a DT/ 3-4 DE to adapt to the NFL game.

Whiz loves his D-line as much as he appears to hate drafting O-lineman :) One 1st rd and two 2nd rd picks taken on the D-line in 5 years against one 1st rd O-lineman. The mid/late rd picks are fairly even in number of picks invested on the respective lines.

I'm on board. :thumbup:
 

Chopper0080

2021 - Prove It
Joined
May 15, 2002
Posts
28,269
Reaction score
40,267
Location
Colorado
Fletcher Cox
Stephon Gilmore
Cordy Glenn
Donta Hightower
Mark Barron

All good players that could help us, maybe trade back a couple spots because someone like Chicago might really like the idea of adding Coples.

Please stop with the Courtney Upshaw rants. While we might be stupid enough to take him, I question the overall justification of taking a slow OLB whose strength is not rushing the passer at #13. That is like drafting a run stopping DE at #13 which most figure is pretty idiotic. I swear every time I hear a player described as "just a football player" all that comes to mind is he is not athletic and has no business in the first round of a draft. There is a reason most are projecting him as a DE, and possibly falling out of the first round all together.
 

slanidrac16

ASFN Icon
Supporting Member
Joined
Jul 11, 2002
Posts
15,585
Reaction score
15,851
Location
Plainfield, Il.
Take Hightower. We'd have two ILB'sfor the next 10 years....unless we lose them in free agency....:(
 
OP
OP
Lomax to Green 84

Lomax to Green 84

Hall of Famer
Joined
May 15, 2002
Posts
1,419
Reaction score
631
Location
Illinois
Fletcher Cox
Stephon Gilmore
Cordy Glenn
Donta Hightower
Mark Barron

All good players that could help us, maybe trade back a couple spots because someone like Chicago might really like the idea of adding Coples.

Please stop with the Courtney Upshaw rants. While we might be stupid enough to take him, I question the overall justification of taking a slow OLB whose strength is not rushing the passer at #13. That is like drafting a run stopping DE at #13 which most figure is pretty idiotic. I swear every time I hear a player described as "just a football player" all that comes to mind is he is not athletic and has no business in the first round of a draft. There is a reason most are projecting him as a DE, and possibly falling out of the first round all together.


That slow, unathletic player was only the most dominant player on the greatest defense in the history of college football.

Quote from a NFL Scout in Pro Football Weekly (Audibles): " I love Courtney Upshaw. He may be my favorite player this year. Other scouts are killing him because he is short. I say, OK, let him go to Pittsburgh and turn into a pro bowler."
 

Dr. Jones

Has No Time For Love
Joined
Nov 2, 2004
Posts
27,268
Reaction score
16,158
That slow, unathletic player was only the most dominant player on the greatest defense in the history of college football.

Quote from a NFL Scout in Pro Football Weekly (Audibles): " I love Courtney Upshaw. He may be my favorite player this year. Other scouts are killing him because he is short. I say, OK, let him go to Pittsburgh and turn into a pro bowler."

THIS.

And Barron, Hightower, & Kirkpatrick were on that defense with him.
 

kerouac9

Klowned by Keim
Joined
Feb 14, 2003
Posts
38,369
Reaction score
29,735
Location
Gilbert, AZ
I like both those guys for us. Also Gilmore or Kendall Wright. Not too enamored with Cordy Glenn but he wouldn't be too bad either. I just don't see how this draft can go bad for us before we pick. There doesn't appear to be many superstars but an awful lot of very solid football players in this class. Not a bad year to have a pick like #13. Oh yeah, don't forget 13 is the Cards lucky number.

This. The caliber of player chosen between 11 and 25 isn't going to be that varied. The drafniks will crow that whomever picks at 24 is getting "great value", while those picking at 12 "might be making a little bit of a reach."

There's a broad middle ground after the first half-dozen or so picks in the draft. DeCastro might be a better player than Glenn, but Glenn--even at RT--plays a more valuable position. Brockers and Cox aren't going to put up flashy stats, but they'll ensure that the linebackers playing directly behind them can.

I don't think that the Cards would even remotely consider taking Keuchly. I bet they hope that he's taken in the Top 10 picks. Let someone else make the mistake of drafting the next A.J. Hawk.
 

Bodha

ASFN Addict
BANNED BY MODERATORS
Joined
Sep 3, 2011
Posts
5,710
Reaction score
754
I imagine the BPA in this scenario is Stephon Gilmore.

Hed be who I take anyways in this scenario (disregarding BPA).

Gilmore + PP + Toler would give us a formidable secondary. All wed need is to sign CC and add a OLB and our D would be lights out.
 

Cbus cardsfan

Back to Back ASFN FFL Champion
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
21,462
Reaction score
7,631
I imagine the BPA in this scenario is Stephon Gilmore.

Hed be who I take anyways in this scenario (disregarding BPA).

Gilmore + PP + Toler would give us a formidable secondary. All wed need is to sign CC and add a OLB and our D would be lights out.
I agree with this if a trade down was not available. We don't know how Toler will return and it's not like he was a proven commodity anyway. Jefferson is a dime back and Gay will probably assume Marshall's role. Even looking to the future, and Toler pans out, Gilmore and Toler could be a good starting CB combo and PP could eventually slide into a ball hawking FS. However, I really think PP will remain at CB for the long term and be a perrenial pro bowler at the position. Either way, taking Gilmore would give the Cards at ton of options in the secondary and he's likely the BPA in this scenario.

That being said, I fear the Cardinals will be in a panic trade down mode and look to take the first offer to slide down a few spots and take Glenn or Adams.
 
Top