Yeesh!

SECTION 11

vibraslap
Joined
Oct 11, 2002
Posts
16,388
Reaction score
4,868
Location
Between the Pipes
Re: Teams rarely trade players!

Originally posted by Cardiac
If the Cards end the season with more than 2 mil under the cap I will start a thread stating that koolaide has been very very bad to me and that I'm an idiot. For now, I'm keep hydrating myself with this tasty beverage and wait to see how the season plays out.


Where in the world are they going to spend $12M?
I don't see it.
 

EndZone

Hall of Famer
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
2,369
Reaction score
38
Location
New York
Re: Teams rarely trade players!

Originally posted by Cardiac
If the Cards end the season with more than 2 mil under the cap I will start a thread stating that koolaide has been very very bad to me and that I'm an idiot. For now, I'm keep hydrating myself with this tasty beverage and wait to see how the season plays out. :cool:

Even if they are 10-6?
 

Cardiac

ASFN Icon
Joined
Jul 21, 2002
Posts
12,069
Reaction score
3,342
The Cards will spend the money on Ray Thompson, Clement, Wilson and of course on Peppers when the Panthers cut him.;)
 

Cardiac

ASFN Icon
Joined
Jul 21, 2002
Posts
12,069
Reaction score
3,342
Re: Re: Teams rarely trade players!

Originally posted by EndZone
Even if they are 10-6?

If the Cards finish 10-6 there isn't a fate except for death that would make me regret that decision. Posting I'm an idiot for this kind of a record, well let's say I'd just be stating the obvious anyways and would do this on a daily basis for that kind of a season.:D
 

nationsrj

Veteran
Joined
Jan 20, 2003
Posts
184
Reaction score
27
Location
Peoria AZ
I look at Ted Washington as a replacement on first and second down in the middle. This would remove either Wendell Bryant(unlikely) or Russell Davis(more likely). This leaves Marcus Bell, Barron Tanner and Russell Davis as your backups.
Most likely one of those three(likely Tanner) is a cut before the season. I feel this ends up hurting Bell's development this year.

I do not see Ted Washington as fitting the philosophy that McGinnis has changed to this year.
He is looking at speed from the D-line and how speedy is Washington at his size?

I agree that he would help our run defense, at the expense of Marcus Bell. I would rather see Bell improve than get Washington.
 

Tangodnzr

ASFN Lifer
BANNED BY MODERATORS
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
3,837
Reaction score
5
Location
Idaho
Originally posted by cheesebeef
Right Skkorp -I forgot how UNSUCCESSFUL the Pats were a couple years ago with pick-ups like these and how bad they were last year as well. But of course - he wasn't a body we could have used. And now he has locker room baggage - Did I say he was an all-pro? No - Is he better than anything else we have - if healthy - I think yes. The guy was the Anchor on a great defense two years ago.
Hey Cheesy....The Pats won the super bowl in 02 right? What was their record (under Belichick) in 01? The answer 5 -11. Those numbers look familiar? Going into the 02 season everyone thought they would suck. Sound familiar again? You use the Pats as an example of what's apparently "good" and at the same time crucify the Cards yet hindsight shows a real similarity in paths. Yet the Pats/Belichick are geniuses and Mac/Cards are idiots. Talk about a YEESH!
...and BTW, 2 years ago Ricky Watters was the man in Seattle, as was Terrell Davis in Denver, Vinnie Testeverde in N.Y. and Randall McDaniel was starting for Tamba Bay.
The point....Time moves on....2 years ago is history. Using 2 year old comparisons is pretty meaningless, especially with older players. YEESH again!!!!

As far as our fourth rounders - does it matter - we would prbably give it up to move back in next years draft. Honestly if he was good enough for Bellichick and the Pats, whose personell dept. has been shown to be vastly superior to ours, than he he's good enough for me. Get over the darkside stuff already Skkorp - this is guy we could have used and I bet were waiting for the cuts to get him and as sual our lack of proactivity bit us in the ass.
So the Pats personell (sic) dept. has been shown to be vastly superior to ours huh? According to who? just you? On what basis?
Here's some actual facts that might dispute your baseless claim: (and address the issue of how valuable a 4th rounder may be, and who actually seems to have done better with those selections in recent years:

red = no longer with team

Cards
2003 - Kenny King
2002 - Nate Dwyer
2001 - Bill Grammatica, Marcus Bell
2000 - David Barrett
1999 - Joe Mackovicka
1998 - none
1997 - Chris Dishman
1996 - Aaron Graham
1995 - none

Pats
2003 - Asante Samuel CB
2002 - Rohan Davey QB, Jarvis Green DE
2001 - Kenyatta Jones G, (Jabari Halloway TE
2000 - Greg Robinson-Randall OT
1999 - none
1998 - Leonta Rheams DT,
1997 - Damon Denson G
1996 - Heath Irwin G, Chris Sullivan DE, Kantoy Barber RB
1995 - Dave Wolenbaugh C

Show me how, in just the choice of 4th rounders alone, there is even any remote justification for claiming how much better the Pats personnel dept is. From this, it would seem that its the Cards who do the better job there.
 
Last edited:

AZCB34

ASFN Icon
Joined
Sep 23, 2002
Posts
14,851
Reaction score
7,091
Location
Mesa, AZ
By and large I have tried to remain mum on this without taking a position one way or the other. So let me point out a few things here that I think are the issue and we'll see if we can make this conversation take a different path.

First, Ted Washington is an older player...that cannot be denied. We all go crazy criticizing the guys age but the Cards brought in a aging RB into a position of apparent strength and we don;t want an aging veteran in a position of depth weakness. He is coming back from injury for sure but as I pointed out last night, before last year his mised ONE start in 8 years. That isn't injury prone to me. The Patriots did their homework and part of that was a physical...which there is no doubt he passed since the trade went through.

Second, I have little doubt the Cards weren't interested (they may have not even known Washington was on the block). Do I think he would have been able to help? Yes because the only DT anyone has had total praise for up to now has been Bell. Skkorp himself in a thread yesterday question if Bryant had the will and desire to succeed in the NFL. Sorry but that isn;t what I call high praise for our former 1st rounder...and this analysis is by a guy who saw more TC practices than almost anybody else (pinnacle and Renz excluded). He is better than Davis and he is better than Tanner and some would argue he is better than Bell although Bell appears to have earned serious playing time.

Finally, while I think he would have upgraded a position for a year, Ted Washington doesn;t represent a player missed to me but rather a generalized opportunity that the Cards seem to miss too often. Teams are making trades and trying to get better and the Cards move merrily along with what they have. The quality teams in the NFL don't stand pat. They are constantly working to get better. They are able to make the trades to improve their teams. They go out and find the trash heap player who wa waived and make a player out of him. The Cards seem content to do nothing special to try and make a difference...ESPECIALLY at positions of weakness and DT is a position of weakness IMO (along with DE and CB).

The point is, whether the cards liked him or not, Washington represents more than a player they could have had. He represents alot of players they could have had and either they couldn;t make the sale, or they hoped for something better or they didn;t have their ear close enough to the ground to hear the rumblings.

I still give Graves a C+ but when is he going to do the one thing that makes average/good GMs great ones? Occasionally take a risk. Maybe it pans out and maybe it doesn't but if you never take the risk you will always be mired in problems. That is my ultimate problem. The risk isn't taken and the stagnancy of this organization is frustrating.
 

SECTION 11

vibraslap
Joined
Oct 11, 2002
Posts
16,388
Reaction score
4,868
Location
Between the Pipes
And we all know that the true measure of success isn't division titles, playoff wins, or even Superbowls...
it's actually the success of fourth round draft picks.
 

40yearfan

DEFENSE!!!!
Supporting Member
Joined
Feb 2, 2003
Posts
35,013
Reaction score
456
Location
Phoenix, AZ.
Originally posted by AZCB34
By and large I have tried to remain mum on this without taking a position one way or the other. So let me point out a few things here that I think are the issue and we'll see if we can make this conversation take a different path.

First, Ted Washington is an older player...that cannot be denied. We all go crazy criticizing the guys age but the Cards brought in a aging RB into a position of apparent strength and we don;t want an aging veteran in a position of depth weakness. He is coming back from injury for sure but as I pointed out last night, before last year his mised ONE start in 8 years. That isn't injury prone to me. The Patriots did their homework and part of that was a physical...which there is no doubt he passed since the trade went through.

Second, I have little doubt the Cards weren't interested (they may have not even known Washington was on the block). Do I think he would have been able to help? Yes because the only DT anyone has had total praise for up to now has been Bell. Skkorp himself in a thread yesterday question if Bryant had the will and desire to succeed in the NFL. Sorry but that isn;t what I call high praise for our former 1st rounder...and this analysis is by a guy who saw more TC practices than almost anybody else (pinnacle and Renz excluded). He is better than Davis and he is better than Tanner and some would argue he is better than Bell although Bell appears to have earned serious playing time.

Finally, while I think he would have upgraded a position for a year, Ted Washington doesn;t represent a player missed to me but rather a generalized opportunity that the Cards seem to miss too often. Teams are making trades and trying to get better and the Cards move merrily along with what they have. The quality teams in the NFL don't stand pat. They are constantly working to get better. They are able to make the trades to improve their teams. They go out and find the trash heap player who wa waived and make a player out of him. The Cards seem content to do nothing special to try and make a difference...ESPECIALLY at positions of weakness and DT is a position of weakness IMO (along with DE and CB).

The point is, whether the cards liked him or not, Washington represents more than a player they could have had. He represents alot of players they could have had and either they couldn;t make the sale, or they hoped for something better or they didn;t have their ear close enough to the ground to hear the rumblings.

I still give Graves a C+ but when is he going to do the one thing that makes average/good GMs great ones? Occasionally take a risk. Maybe it pans out and maybe it doesn't but if you never take the risk you will always be mired in problems. That is my ultimate problem. The risk isn't taken and the stagnancy of this organization is frustrating.

AZCB, clarification. You talk about getting a player off of waivers, but that isn't the case with Washington. Are you saying the Cards should have traded a 4th round pick for Washington?
 

LVCARDFREAK

In the league 20 years!
Joined
Mar 3, 2003
Posts
6,360
Reaction score
1
Location
Vegas
Originally posted by Tangodnzr
So the Pats personell (sic) dept. has been shown to be vastly superior to ours huh? According to who? just you? On what basis?
Here's some actual facts that might dispute your baseless claim: (and address the issue of how valuable a 4th rounder may be, and who actually seems to have done better with those selections in recent years:

red = no longer with team

Cards
2003 - Kenny King
2002 - Nate Dwyer
2001 - Bill Grammatica, Marcus Bell
2000 - David Barrett
1999 - Joe Mackovicka
1998 - none
1997 - Chris Dishman
1996 - Aaron Graham
1995 - none

Pats
2003 - Asante Samuel CB
2002 - Rohan Davey QB, Jarvis Green DE
2001 - Kenyatta Jones G, (Jabari Halloway TE
2000 - Greg Robinson-Randall OT
1999 - none
1998 - Leonta Rheams DT,
1997 - Damon Denson G
1996 - Heath Irwin G, Chris Sullivan DE, Kantoy Barber RB
1995 - Dave Wolenbaugh C

Show me how, in just the choice of 4th rounders alone, there is even any remote justification for claiming how much better the Pats personnel dept is. From this, it would seem that its the Cards who do the better job there.


Nice Try Tango....

Of course you may want to look at bigger factors such as record in the 90's, division titles, AFC Championships, Superbowls appearances, Superbowl wins, ....I think that is a better judge than how well their 4th rounders do. puhleease!
 

Tangodnzr

ASFN Lifer
BANNED BY MODERATORS
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
3,837
Reaction score
5
Location
Idaho
Originally posted by SECTION 11
And we all know that the true measure of success isn't division titles, playoff wins, or even Superbowls...
it's actually the success of fourth round draft picks.
No surprise here with this post. Cheesy still has his peanut gallery's support. It was Cheesy who made the outlandish statement of how superior the Pats personell(sic) dept. was, and a few people also commented on how giving up a 4th round pick wasn't much, especially since it was the Cards picking.
 

SECTION 11

vibraslap
Joined
Oct 11, 2002
Posts
16,388
Reaction score
4,868
Location
Between the Pipes
Originally posted by 40yearfan
AZCB, clarification. You talk about getting a player off of waivers, but that isn't the case with Washington. Are you saying the Cards should have traded a 4th round pick for Washington?


I'm not CB, but Hell Yeah.
 

SECTION 11

vibraslap
Joined
Oct 11, 2002
Posts
16,388
Reaction score
4,868
Location
Between the Pipes
Originally posted by Tangodnzr
No surprise here with this post. Cheesy still has his peanut gallery's support. It was Cheesy who made the outlandish statement of how superior the Pats personell(sic) dept. was, and a few people also commented on how giving up a 4th round pick wasn't much, especially since it was the Cards picking.


They've got four 4th rounders still on their squad.
By the end of cut downs, we'll have four 4th rounders on our squad.

Given that the fourth rounders are a wash, I'd say that the Patriots front office blows ours away.
Rings, Records, Rosevelt... for example.
 

Wild Card

Surfin' Bird
Joined
May 30, 2003
Posts
1,643
Reaction score
0
Location
Glendale, AZ
Originally posted by Tangodnzr
red = no longer with team

Cards
2003 - Kenny King
2002 - Nate Dwyer
2001 - Bill Grammatica, Marcus Bell
2000 - David Barrett
1999 - Joe Mackovicka
1998 - none
1997 - Chris Dishman
1996 - Aaron Graham
1995 - none

Tango:

Correct me if I'm wrong, but aren't Joel Mackovicka and Aaron Graham "no longer with (the) team?" And isn't Nate Dwyer generally regarded as a bust, who probably wouldn't have a place on a better team's roster?

Not arguing your general point, just error-checking your copy. ;)

WC
 

AZCB34

ASFN Icon
Joined
Sep 23, 2002
Posts
14,851
Reaction score
7,091
Location
Mesa, AZ
Originally posted by Evil Ash
Wow, okay where to begin ...

(1) Rod Graves was never given an opportunity in Chicago ... he was given the title but had very little power (Dave Wannstedt (sp?) was actually given the power of GM and head coach)

Graves did run the 1997 draft for Chicago but prior to that he was more administrative. He never had much power there except for the end. Inexplicably, the Bears let him run their draft even though he was leaving the team...and from what I remember he had chosen his successor (Hatley).
 

Tangodnzr

ASFN Lifer
BANNED BY MODERATORS
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
3,837
Reaction score
5
Location
Idaho
Wildcard, the reason I didn't put Mackovicka and Graham's names in red was because I assumed any knowledgable Card fan (which EVERYONE claims to be) would know that with out me having to tell them.

I would agree that Dwyer APPEARS to be a bust, but he IS still with the team so, as of the moment, its not etched in stone yet.

Mackovicka started for 4 years here. Like him or not...that's not a bust.

Graham was the starting center for awhile, but just wasn't big enough to be a long term starter. Not a pick to wow the world, but again, not a total bust either.

As for the Pats, so far on their list only Kenyatta Jones has actually shown much of anything at this point. This years, and maybe even last..are really too soon to fairly judge eithers picks.
 

AZCB34

ASFN Icon
Joined
Sep 23, 2002
Posts
14,851
Reaction score
7,091
Location
Mesa, AZ
Originally posted by 40yearfan
AZCB, clarification. You talk about getting a player off of waivers, but that isn't the case with Washington. Are you saying the Cards should have traded a 4th round pick for Washington?

Second part, yes I believe a 4th rounder was well worth the risk. IMO, the Patriots stole him for that but that is simply my opinion. Go check out a Bears board and there is overwhelming disgust with this move.

My waiver comments are based on reading the waiver wire each day. Watching teams dropping this guy and scooping up this guy. It shows me attempts are being made to improve on a daily basis. Maybe they are foolhardy attempts but these teams are trying and the Cards have been absent from any activity. All I am suggesting is that at some point risks need to be taken. Maybe the risks fail but at least you are TRYING.

Like I said, and make no mistake, Graves has done more good than bad this offseason but I want him to take calculated risks. Washington was basically a no downside risk. Even if he gets hurt, you are no worse off and if he plays as well as most in Chicago were expecting, they he has improved the team.
 

Stout

Hold onto the ball, Murray!
Joined
Dec 30, 2002
Posts
40,098
Reaction score
24,559
Location
Pittsburgh, PA--Enemy territory!
Originally posted by Tangodnzr
red = no longer with team

Cards
2003 - Kenny King
2002 - Nate Dwyer
2001 - Bill Grammatica, Marcus Bell
2000 - David Barrett
1999 - Joe Mackovicka
1998 - none
1997 - Chris Dishman
1996 - Aaron Graham
1995 - none

Pats
2003 - Asante Samuel CB
2002 - Rohan Davey QB, Jarvis Green DE
2001 - Kenyatta Jones G, (Jabari Halloway TE
2000 - Greg Robinson-Randall OT
1999 - none
1998 - Leonta Rheams DT,
1997 - Damon Denson G
1996 - Heath Irwin G, Chris Sullivan DE, Kantoy Barber RB
1995 - Dave Wolenbaugh C




Actually, to 'clarify' this mistake-riddled list (some others already pointed out some of the mistakes):

Kenny King wasn't a fourth round choice. Hello? We didn't HAVE a fourth round pick. We traded it away and it's been a source of argument for months, remember?

Also, Dave Wolenbaugh is still a solid starter in this league, though not with the Pats. They had to get rid of him when they drafted Woody for cap purposes. That pick was therefore a success, because he was a good player. No one on our list, yet, has lived up to the success Wolenbaugh has had.

By your rationale, all of the Pats players not in red have the ability to be breakout players, simply for the fact that they are STILL on the roster. This is a rationale I completely disagree with (so many flaws to that kind of logic), but whatever.

Case in point, you don't call Graham a bust *yawn* Riiiiiiight. And we all know, just because a player starts in the NFL, he was a good player and not a bust. Then why was it Missablocka rarely opened up holes, played like a weeble-wobble and was a pass-catching nonentity? Why did he earn the name Missablocka? Why hasn't he been signed by another team? Could it be he doesn't have enough talent? Impossible by your rationale, because he started here.

Just wanted to clear up some of your oversights.
 

Sandan

ASFN Icon
Supporting Member
Joined
May 15, 2002
Posts
24,757
Reaction score
2,230
Location
Plymouth, UK
Originally posted by Evil Ash
Now am I saying that I agree with everything that Rod Graves has done thus far? No, I'd still would have liked to get a vet WR and the fact that he went after Kordell scares the crap out of me.

I won't bother to repeat what ASH said, it's just that you seem to look for every opportunity to spin somethings as bad. Then you ignore the good.

However, that one thing more than any other did scare Just Say No to Kordell , I would rather have Jake back than that.
 

danny l

LEGACY MEMBER
LEGACY MEMBER
Joined
Jul 24, 2003
Posts
221
Reaction score
0
Location
missouri bootheel
The things that those of you whowant Ted Washington and the DT that was discussed yesterday are ignoring are (1) Our coaching staff are fine with our Defensive Tackle position. It is D end that they are concerned about. and(2) the 2 DT's that you are pushing do not fit the new defensive scheme of the team. They want D-linemen that can move, penetrate , and make plays in the offensive backfield. I certainly don't think that Washington fits that mold.
I also would like to see us make some positve personnel moves, but not moves just to show that we are doing something.
 

Ouchie-Z-Clown

I'm better than Mulli!
Joined
Sep 16, 2002
Posts
64,065
Reaction score
58,982
Location
SoCal
Originally posted by AzCards21
Last time I checked ALL of our draft picks were contributing this year, so far. Total failure? Or a new way of doing business?

last time i checked the season hadn't started.
 

RugbyMuffin

ASFN IDOL
Joined
Apr 30, 2003
Posts
30,485
Reaction score
4,877
Originally posted by Renz
Did the season start all ready? Wow! I must have missed it. I thought we had two-and-a-half weeks until the beginning of the regular season.

And as we all know, there are no DL out there better than Ted Washington. :rolleyes:

Fine Graves has a little less than 3 weeks to get a vet DL onto the team.
TICK TOCK TICK TOCK!:thumbup:
 

Ouchie-Z-Clown

I'm better than Mulli!
Joined
Sep 16, 2002
Posts
64,065
Reaction score
58,982
Location
SoCal
Originally posted by jmr667
Really. If the guy was feeling and looking so good in Chicago how did he end up on the trading block? And why for future draft picks instead of a need position this year?

For some reason the Bears thought the guy was NOT going to help them get to the Superbowl this year. In fact a 4th round draft pick next year looked more useful to them. Should we be thinking different about the Cards?

Lots of people spouting opinions about the trade. But unless we figure out why the Bears thought he was expendable how can we know what good the guy could do here? Are the Bears that deep at DT?
We spend so much time bashing the Bronco's for picking up Jake. We say they are fools for thinking they know the player better than his previous coaching staff. Then along comes another guy deemed expendable by his own team...

by that logic no one should ever trade for another player 'cuz at least one team with superior knowledge of his play deemed him expendable...
 

SECTION 11

vibraslap
Joined
Oct 11, 2002
Posts
16,388
Reaction score
4,868
Location
Between the Pipes
Originally posted by jmr667
Really. If the guy was feeling and looking so good in Chicago how did he end up on the trading block? And why for future draft picks instead of a need position this year?


They cleared up $1.6M in cap space and gained some trade fodder with a fourth rounder.
My guess is that Duce Staley will find his way to Chicago before the season starts.
At this point, Chicago's offense is in much worse shape than their defense and I think they're looking to improve on O, albeit at the expense of the defense.
 

kerouac9

Klowned by Keim
Joined
Feb 14, 2003
Posts
38,618
Reaction score
30,348
Location
Gilbert, AZ
Originally posted by danny l
The things that those of you whowant Ted Washington and the DT that was discussed yesterday are ignoring are (1) Our coaching staff are fine with our Defensive Tackle position. It is D end that they are concerned about. and(2) the 2 DT's that you are pushing do not fit the new defensive scheme of the team. They want D-linemen that can move, penetrate , and make plays in the offensive backfield. I certainly don't think that Washington fits that mold.
I also would like to see us make some positve personnel moves, but not moves just to show that we are doing something.

Man, I guess. I don't see Fred Wakefield, KVB, Barron Tanner, or Russell Davis being able to "move, penetrate, and make plays in the offensive backfield." LDEs, as a general rule, aren't penetrators (once-a-generation talents like Julius Peppers notwithstanding) because they have to pay attention to runs on the strong-side of the line.

Chidi Ahanotu and Ted Washington are going to make the players around them better in two ways: They're goint to impart playing experience, and they're going to attract attention, freeing up the younger talent to make plays. Do you really think that Chidi, after 8 years or whatever in the league, is going to allow himself to be ridden upfield by the ORT, like KVB did all preseason? Regardless of whether you believe it or not, older players have knowledge, savvy, and moves that younger players do not. Players like Washington and Ahanotu can make the difference between 4.2 YPC and 3.6. That could translate into two wins. That's the difference between a 7-9 team and a 9-7 team.
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
556,090
Posts
5,432,453
Members
6,329
Latest member
cardinals2025
Top