JCSunsfan
ASFN Icon
- Joined
- Oct 24, 2002
- Posts
- 22,114
- Reaction score
- 6,547
The surest way to destroy an asset in the NBA is to pay him too much, especially for too long.
Wizards "insiders" are saying that the Wiz have a good firm offer for Wall, but it cannot happen until December 15. Listen. I am going to tell you right now so you all can be prepared. If its us, it is going to include our 2019 pick--not suggesting, I am predicting, and I would not be happy about that I don't think unless there is significant protection.
The only other thing I could see is something like Ryan Anderson, Josh Jackson and Milwaukee pick for Wall and Jason Smith. I cannot imagine the Wiz would want that, but I guess none of us really know what JJ's value is right now. He was highly valuable in August.
Wizards "insiders" are saying that the Wiz have a good firm offer for Wall, but it cannot happen until December 15. Listen. I am going to tell you right now so you all can be prepared. If its us, it is going to include our 2019 pick--not suggesting, I am predicting, and I would not be happy about that I don't think unless there is significant protection.
The only other thing I could see is something like Ryan Anderson, Josh Jackson and Milwaukee pick for Wall and Jason Smith. I cannot imagine the Wiz would want that, but I guess none of us really know what JJ's value is right now. He was highly valuable in August.
I have a bad feeling it will be our pick this year and a future 1st. Ariza would be involved, the December 15th date makes that apparent, and one of Melton or Okobo probably included also. We wouldn't need all of them if we had Wall. I hope Jackson isn't included, especially if we're moving Ariza but I think his value is much higher than most suspect. He's played a dozen games in a crowded rotation. Of course Washington's rotation would get crowded adding Ariza and Jackson to Beal and Porter. I have heard some say that Beal could play PG but I'm not so sure of that.
You guys have us giving up picks for a player that should have huge negative value. And I've read more than one writer who claims they will have to give up multiple picks to move Wall. I really hope the sports writers are correct.
Wizards "insiders" are saying that the Wiz have a good firm offer for Wall, but it cannot happen until December 15. Listen. I am going to tell you right now so you all can be prepared. If its us, it is going to include our 2019 pick--not suggesting, I am predicting, and I would not be happy about that I don't think unless there is significant protection.
The only other thing I could see is something like Ryan Anderson, Josh Jackson and Milwaukee pick for Wall and Jason Smith. I cannot imagine the Wiz would want that, but I guess none of us really know what JJ's value is right now. He was highly valuable in August.
but we still won’t contend and his contract will destroy our ability to put anything around booker and ayton till his contract expires.
He is not nearly good enough, and he is too old for his contract.
The Suns will most certainly be terrible for 3-4 years if Wall doesn't work out once his super max kicks in.
He is arguably better than Nash was when we signed him and younger than Nash was.
How is 28 too old?
I'm on the fence about Wall and leaning toward going after him, but not at the cost of next year's pick, unless it's well protected. Some future pick of lesser value, maybe, but not a top-five pick. (And yes, I think that the Suns are still a bottom-five team this season even with Wall, until Ayton develops, Jackson settles down, and Kokoskov figures out how to coach.)
Geez
How much more do you need than 3 allstar caliber players plus TJ Warren and Mikal Bridges and since Wall wouldn't cost too much to acquire a lot of assets to make further moves.
Since Wall shoud cost so little in a trade, trading for him would be roughly the same as signing Kemba for the max in the offseason.
We are far enough under the relevant cap treshholds that we don't have to worry much about Wall and could even fit in another trade like for Kevin Love.
The last year of Wall and Love's contract could be spicy since it would be the first year of Ayton and Bridges next deal.
He is arguably better than Nash was when we signed him and younger than Nash was.
How is 28 too old?
I disagree. Look at the effect that Nash had on his teammates numbers. Nash was on the NBAs #1 ranked offenses for how many years? Wall gets his numbers but he has never been as good at facilitating an offense overall.
It's not that 28 is too old now; It's the idea that he will be old once that super max kicks in and his injury history might turn him into another Hardaway.
Kemba is a better player.
28 is not too old but 32/33 is when your game is mainly based off your athleticism, Nash's game never really was.
Ok, so I just took a more in depth look at Wall. To be honest he is statistically better than I thought, and actually I thought he was 29. So I will admit I value him more than I did before your post.
However, his contract is worse than I thought - he is under contract for this year, plus 4 more years. I thought it was 4 years including this year.
Unless he continues to play at a very high level that entire time, and all of our young players plus at least a few of our late round draft picks pan out, we will not be contenders. That is too risky a bet in my book.
It really is this simple - is John Wall a good contract? If the answer is no, you should not want to add him to the team if you have any faith in your management whatsoever.
I disagree. Look at the effect that Nash had on his teammates numbers. Nash was on the NBAs #1 ranked offenses for how many years? Wall gets his numbers but he has never been as good at facilitating an offense overall.
It's not that 28 is too old now; It's the idea that he will be old once that super max kicks in and his injury history might turn him into another Hardaway.
Kemba is a better player.
Unless he continues to play at a very high level that entire time, and all of our young players plus at least a few of our late round draft picks pan out, we will not be contenders. That is too risky a bet in my book.
It really is this simple - is John Wall a good contract? If the answer is no, you should not want to add him to the team if you have any faith in your management whatsoever.
No significant FA is going to sign here, hasn't happened in more than 10 years
Suns will have to grossly overpay for even a mid level free agent
The suns have a poor track record in the draft
The Arena is empty
The suns have been irrelevant for 8 years
Drafting another rookie that will take 2 seasons to maybe work out and signing a washed up vet to twice his worth are bad options IMO. Booker is our best PG option but do we really want him playing PG this season and likely next season if we draft a PG.
The team recently fired its GM, is irrelevant, boring, last in almost every statistical category, has an owner with a bad rep. and an empty stadium. Something bold and risky is needed to put this team on the map. Wall is an 18 and 9 PG that plays defense, if there were no health concerns and he was on a good contract he wouldn't be available.
If he washes out we are definitely screwed but that is the case with every max contract. If he plays well and stays healthy we will have a great team.
I say if the medical staff says he's good to go, why not. If there was a better option I'd be all for it.
...who isn't coming to the Suns, you left out.
Contenders? No, the Suns would not be contenders in that scenario, you're right. But if we're setting the bar that high, there's literally no move the Suns can make. The gap between where they are and even being mediocre is enormous.
Then we'd better dump Booker while we still can. His contract is only about 70% of Wall's, but it's just as long, his injury history is just as bad, and he plays only one end of the floor.