How much longer do you think the Cards can win games 19-13 or 21-19? I think we have the defense to join the top teams in the NFL allowing 17 ppg but with that offense can the Cards score enough to win?
As for Doucet, I just don't think he brings much to the offense. He doesn't have a size advantage, he isn't quick, he doesn't run over people, he doesn't have exceptional catching ability. He's just nothing special.
We have something special at WR already. His name is Larry Fitzgerald. We have another something potentially special at TE named Rob Housler. You don't need every offensive weapon to be special, you need one guy to be special to be competent, two guys to be excellent.
In New Orleans, that's Brees and Graham.
In Texas, it's Andre Johnson and Arian Foster.
In Green Bay, it's Rodgers and Jennings (Finley is special but there's nothing special about Nelson or their other WR--they're no better or worse than Doucet).
In New England, it's Gronkowski and Brady.
You are going to pay Meachem or Simpson or whomever 15% more to come here than you'd be paying Doucet to stay. Why does everyone think that Doucet is going to demand more money than these guys, when wanting him to stay is a minority opinion?
It doesn't matter who you have on the outside as long as you continue to expose your crappy QBs and not run the ball. Does San Francisco have anyone special on the outside? Does Baltimore (be honest)?
The offense isn't going to improve until the team commits to running the ball first or finds more consistent play at the QB position. I expect that the plan is to bring everyone back and hope that a full offseason's work with Skelton and Kolb move one or both of them into the Middle Tier of quarterbacks in the NFL. I know that this staff has no interest in pounding the rock, regardless of what their acquisitions on the offensive line suggest.