Going to Lindley doesn't look so stupid right now

MaoTosiFanClub

The problem
Joined
Oct 7, 2003
Posts
12,734
Reaction score
6,602
Location
Scottsdale, AZ
I think you mean stay on the field, because not many QBs can with this offense. Even the high and mighty Kurt (bless his heart) Warner missed big chunks because of this "prolific dynamic" offense. Kolb was tough this year and got taken out on a muffed play, I aint knocking him for this year's injury. Let's talk signing bonuses, if we bring in another hot shot, we'd be paying even more for another guy to come in and get smashed.
Warner missed one game in 2007, played all 16 in 2008, and missed one more in 2009. Skelton has missed no games due to injury. Meanwhile Kolb probably has missed 20 games in the last three years due to injury.

Not even close.

Kolb coming back at his full salary with those facts is absurdity even with him being the least terrible quarterback on the roster.
 

kerouac9

Klowned by Keim
Joined
Feb 14, 2003
Posts
38,395
Reaction score
29,782
Location
Gilbert, AZ
Warner missed one game in 2007, played all 16 in 2008, and missed one more in 2009. Skelton has missed no games due to injury. Meanwhile Kolb probably has missed 20 games in the last three years due to injury.

Not even close.

Kolb coming back at his full salary with those facts is absurdity even with him being the least terrible quarterback on the roster.

Fair enough, but the Cards have to have something in the pipe as a legitimate alternative. If Kolb comes back for the last two weeks, completes 63% of his passes with 4 TDs and 1 INT and the Cards go 1-1, the Cards are going to have to make a choice.

And they have to make a choice before the beginning of the new league year, because Kolb is due a $2 million roster bonus on or around March 1. Would the Cards rather have nothing (meaning John Skelton and Ryan Lindley) or hope that Kevin Kolb can play in 6-8 games and be competitive before a rookie takes over?

There isn't much to be inspired by on the free agent market for veteran quarterbacks in 2013.
 

Mulli

...
Supporting Member
Joined
Jul 16, 2004
Posts
52,529
Reaction score
4,601
Location
Generational
Fair enough, but the Cards have to have something in the pipe as a legitimate alternative. If Kolb comes back for the last two weeks, completes 63% of his passes with 4 TDs and 1 INT and the Cards go 1-1, the Cards are going to have to make a choice.

And they have to make a choice before the beginning of the new league year, because Kolb is due a $2 million roster bonus on or around March 1. Would the Cards rather have nothing (meaning John Skelton and Ryan Lindley) or hope that Kevin Kolb can play in 6-8 games and be competitive before a rookie takes over?

There isn't much to be inspired by on the free agent market for veteran quarterbacks in 2013.
That hasn't stopped the Cards before:

You must be registered for see images attach
 

CardsSunsDbacks

Not So Skeptical
Joined
Aug 26, 2012
Posts
10,152
Reaction score
6,603
Since we have already played ourselves out of the playoffs I truly hope Whiz sticks with Lindley for the rest of the season (unless he only gets worse from this Rams game) otherwise we might take the chance of ruining whatever confidence he has. If this kid has any chance of becoming a good QB and the way he played during stretches of that Rams game would make me believe that he has a chance, but I get the feeling that Whiz will do whatever is worse for Lindley and not the other way around.
 

MaoTosiFanClub

The problem
Joined
Oct 7, 2003
Posts
12,734
Reaction score
6,602
Location
Scottsdale, AZ
Fair enough, but the Cards have to have something in the pipe as a legitimate alternative. If Kolb comes back for the last two weeks, completes 63% of his passes with 4 TDs and 1 INT and the Cards go 1-1, the Cards are going to have to make a choice.

And they have to make a choice before the beginning of the new league year, because Kolb is due a $2 million roster bonus on or around March 1. Would the Cards rather have nothing (meaning John Skelton and Ryan Lindley) or hope that Kevin Kolb can play in 6-8 games and be competitive before a rookie takes over?

There isn't much to be inspired by on the free agent market for veteran quarterbacks in 2013.

I agree. But like I said my guess is we are either going to try and swing a deal for Rivers/Romo and if unsuccessful draft a QB with our first pick. In either case Kolb is toast unless the rookie QB situation happens and he takes a paycut. I know you're an Alex Smith guy but I just don't see it happening although if he becomes available it could make sense as he'll be extra-motivated to destroy Harbaugh. Smith just doesn't fit well systemically and Whiz doesn't seem interested in tailoring an offense around his talent more making them fit into what he wants to do.
 
Last edited:

b8rtm8nn

ASFN Lifer
Joined
Jan 14, 2003
Posts
3,370
Reaction score
1,647
Location
Tucson
Lindley announced as starter for Jets game today, so that is a start, and I doubt Kolb would be ready even if he made practice all week.
 

kerouac9

Klowned by Keim
Joined
Feb 14, 2003
Posts
38,395
Reaction score
29,782
Location
Gilbert, AZ
I agree. But like I said my guess is we are either going to try and swing a deal for Rivers/Romo and if unsuccessful draft a QB with our first pick. In either case Kolb is toast unless the rookie QB situation happens and he takes a paycut. I know you're an Alex Smith guy but I just don't see it happening although if he becomes available it could make sense as he'll be extra-motivated to destroy Harbaugh. Smith just doesn't fit well systemically and Whiz doesn't seem interested in tailoring an offense around his talent more making them fit into what he wants to do.

I think that Alex Smith was the best that was available at the time for cost. There's no chance that Smith comes to play for the Cards, or that he'd succeed here. I'm not sure that Whis can make any quarterback successful unless it's a Phil Rivers type who's just an ****** who is going to stand strong about what he can and can't do. It'd be awesome to see Whis have to work with Jay Cutler.

The problem is one of timing: the Cards would have to release Kolb March 1, before they really start doing their draft prep, but some two months after the Senior Bowl. If the Cards release Kolb (and they won't--I'll bet he takes a pay cut, but he'd be dumb to), they're burning the ships behind him because they'd have to bring in a stop-gap veteran starter and a rookie that can take over midway through the year.
 
OP
OP
Russ Smith

Russ Smith

The Original Whizzinator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
87,666
Reaction score
38,955
Since we have already played ourselves out of the playoffs I truly hope Whiz sticks with Lindley for the rest of the season (unless he only gets worse from this Rams game) otherwise we might take the chance of ruining whatever confidence he has. If this kid has any chance of becoming a good QB and the way he played during stretches of that Rams game would make me believe that he has a chance, but I get the feeling that Whiz will do whatever is worse for Lindley and not the other way around.

He doesn't. The hope is he's the 3rd QB next year and maybe down the line the #2.

the odds of him being Tom Brady are very slim, Brady was well over 60% in college in the big 10. Lindley under 60 playing much weaker competition. He has a great arm, he's more accurate than Skelton, but he's never going to be a good starter IMO. the thing is neither is Skelton so why continue to play him?

If we were winning games with Skelton it would be different but we weren't this season. The delusion here is that because Skelton was a starter for us, he's a starter, he's not, he shouldn't even be a #2 on a good team. He's way too inaccurate we have enough evidence to see that.

We don't have a starter right now, Kolb is the closest and he's hurt. We're playing backups.
 
Last edited:

Cbus cardsfan

Back to Back ASFN FFL Champion
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
21,463
Reaction score
7,632
I would guess Lindley is not the answer but I liked what I saw from him yesterday and am not going to rip him. He made some very nice throws and, as expected, some horrendous throws. I think he could be servicable once the games slows down for him. He and Fitz weren't on the same page a few times but that was also to be expected. Overall, I was more encouraged than discouraged from what I saw out of him.

I think it's pretty pre-mature for anybody to make judgements as to whether he can be a starter or never more than a #3. He was vastly imporved over the fiasco in Atlanta. We'll see. He definitely has the arm for the NFL.
 

Mitch

Crawled Through 5 FB Fields
Joined
Aug 10, 2005
Posts
13,405
Reaction score
2,982
Location
Wrentham, MA
I would guess Lindley is not the answer but I liked what I saw from him yesterday and am not going to rip him. He made some very nice throws and, as expected, some horrendous throws. I think he could be servicable once the games slows down for him. He and Fitz weren't on the same page a few times but that was also to be expected. Overall, I was more encouraged than discouraged from what I saw out of him.

I think it's pretty pre-mature for anybody to make judgements as to whether he can be a starter or never more than a #3. He was vastly imporved over the fiasco in Atlanta. We'll see. He definitely has the arm for the NFL.

I think that is an honest and fair assessment.
 

Buckybird

Hoist the Lombardi Trophy
Joined
Nov 11, 2002
Posts
25,279
Reaction score
6,223
Location
Dallas, TX
I would guess Lindley is not the answer but I liked what I saw from him yesterday and am not going to rip him. He made some very nice throws and, as expected, some horrendous throws. I think he could be servicable once the games slows down for him. He and Fitz weren't on the same page a few times but that was also to be expected. Overall, I was more encouraged than discouraged from what I saw out of him.

I think it's pretty pre-mature for anybody to make judgements as to whether he can be a starter or never more than a #3. He was vastly imporved over the fiasco in Atlanta. We'll see. He definitely has the arm for the NFL.

I think that is an honest and fair assessment.

I'm also going to say its a fair & honest statement that Lindley isn't the answer. The odds are astronomical the kid is anything more than a career backup at best!!!

I just don't get why we basically never gamble (outside of Kolb) to try to get a franchise QB thru trade...it's time.

Like I said last year, why the Cards didn't dangle three 1s & three 2s in front of the Colts & Rams is beyond me. :mad:
 

CardsSunsDbacks

Not So Skeptical
Joined
Aug 26, 2012
Posts
10,152
Reaction score
6,603
I'm also going to say its a fair & honest statement that Lindley isn't the answer. The odds are astronomical the kid is anything more than a career backup at best!!!

I just don't get why we basically never gamble (outside of Kolb) to try to get a franchise QB thru trade...it's time.

Like I said last year, why the Cards didn't dangle three 1s & three 2s in front of the Colts & Rams is beyond me. :mad:
I'm guessing it would have cost us more for that trade than it did Washington considering they had the 6th pick initially, but we had the 13th. Ultimately it took guts for Washington to do that because if it didn't work out they would have been set back for years.
 
Last edited:

b8rtm8nn

ASFN Lifer
Joined
Jan 14, 2003
Posts
3,370
Reaction score
1,647
Location
Tucson
I'm also going to say its a fair & honest statement that Lindley isn't the answer. The odds are astronomical the kid is anything more than a career backup at best!!!

I just don't get why we basically never gamble (outside of Kolb) to try to get a franchise QB thru trade...it's time.

Like I said last year, why the Cards didn't dangle three 1s & three 2s in front of the Colts & Rams is beyond me. :mad:

We took Leinart...
 

b8rtm8nn

ASFN Lifer
Joined
Jan 14, 2003
Posts
3,370
Reaction score
1,647
Location
Tucson
But given our terrible QB situation last year, there was no excuse to NOT pick up a QB in the round 1 or 3 this year given the talent coming out.
 

Buckybird

Hoist the Lombardi Trophy
Joined
Nov 11, 2002
Posts
25,279
Reaction score
6,223
Location
Dallas, TX
I'm guessing it would have cost us more for that trade than it did Washington considering they had the 6th pick initially, but we had the 13th. Ultimately it took guts for Washington to do that because if it didn't work out they would have been set back for years.

The skins gave up less than what I stated
 

MaoTosiFanClub

The problem
Joined
Oct 7, 2003
Posts
12,734
Reaction score
6,602
Location
Scottsdale, AZ
I'm also going to say its a fair & honest statement that Lindley isn't the answer. The odds are astronomical the kid is anything more than a career backup at best!!!

I just don't get why we basically never gamble (outside of Kolb) to try to get a franchise QB thru trade...it's time.

Like I said last year, why the Cards didn't dangle three 1s & three 2s in front of the Colts & Rams is beyond me. :mad:

We do gamble just not as often as I like. Kolb and Leinart are fine examples that we gave a boatload of money too and it didn't pay off. We offered former MVP Warner a good chunk of change once upon a time as well and it paid off although not initially. The problem is the FO has too long of a leash.

Look at Seattle. All within a 24 month span they traded for Tarvaris Jackson and Charlie Whitehurst (who promptly both bombed) as well as signing Matt Flynn to big money and as insurance drafting Russel Wilson in round 3. That's how important the position is.
 

Buckybird

Hoist the Lombardi Trophy
Joined
Nov 11, 2002
Posts
25,279
Reaction score
6,223
Location
Dallas, TX
Look at Seattle. All within a 24 month span they traded for Tarvaris Jackson and Charlie Whitehurst (who promptly both bombed) as well as signing Matt Flynn to big money and as insurance drafting Russel Wilson in round 3. That's how important the position is.

So we aren't the only one who has trouble picking QBs, they just got lucky (so far) on a 3rd rounder.
 

MaoTosiFanClub

The problem
Joined
Oct 7, 2003
Posts
12,734
Reaction score
6,602
Location
Scottsdale, AZ
So we aren't the only one who has trouble picking QBs, they just got lucky (so far) on a 3rd rounder.
You make your own luck. I'd be willing to bet had it been the Cardinals who traded for TJack and Whitehurst we'd still might be starting one of them and would not have drafted Russell Wilson.
 

Buckybird

Hoist the Lombardi Trophy
Joined
Nov 11, 2002
Posts
25,279
Reaction score
6,223
Location
Dallas, TX
You make your own luck. I'd be willing to bet had it been the Cardinals who traded for TJack and Whitehurst we'd still might be starting one of them and would not have drafted Russell Wilson.

Not many QBs past the 2nd rounder are anything more than average...so IMO it was luck.
 

Latest posts

Members online

Forum statistics

Threads
553,685
Posts
5,410,705
Members
6,319
Latest member
route66
Top