Good Game but dont get ya hopes up

Chaplin

Better off silent
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
46,376
Reaction score
16,877
Location
Round Rock, TX
You guys need to stop banging people for their grammar, seriously, when Gee is out there busting on Lakerfans too.

Glass houses people. It's not like this place is a Harvard english class.

:p

Looks like someone is out of ammunition...



;)
 

Treesquid PhD

Pardon my Engrish
Joined
Apr 12, 2005
Posts
4,844
Reaction score
105
Location
Gilbert
You guys need to stop banging people for their grammar, seriously, when Gee is out there busting on Lakerfans too.

Glass houses people. It's not like this place is a Harvard english class.
I found this kind of appropriate too.
 
Last edited:

TheHopToad

Россия отстой!
Joined
May 29, 2006
Posts
4,019
Reaction score
231
You guys need to stop banging people for their grammar, seriously, when Gee is out there busting on Lakerfans too.

Glass houses people. It's not like this place is a Harvard english class.

:p
FYI: "English" should be capitalized, it is a proper adjective. :D
 

F-Dog

lurker
Joined
Aug 27, 2003
Posts
3,637
Reaction score
0
Location
Tucson
{I was going to make a Cardinals joke here, but thought better of it at the last moment.}
 

Joe Mama

Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
9,500
Reaction score
962
Location
Gilbert, AZ
There's obviously no way to prove this, but it is a fun argument. I actually think that if you swapped Kobe Bryant and Steve Nash and Phoenix Suns would be every bit as good as they are now. It's possible they would be better. Kobe Bryant could easily average 8+ assists on this team.

Joe
 

slinslin

Welcome to Amareca
Joined
Jun 28, 2002
Posts
16,855
Reaction score
562
Location
Hannover - Germany
Kobe Bryant COULD average 8+ assists on the Lakers probably also.. That's not the argument.

This team would probably crumble under Bryant's ego.
 

Cheesebeef

ASFN IDOL
Supporting Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2003
Posts
91,297
Reaction score
68,271
There's obviously no way to prove this, but it is a fun argument. I actually think that if you swapped Kobe Bryant and Steve Nash and Phoenix Suns would be every bit as good as they are now. It's possible they would be better. Kobe Bryant could easily average 8+ assists on this team.

Joe

I kind of agree - people forget that when Kobe had talent, he was the facilitator for 3 title teams that were all damn near unbeatable. They wouldn't run this offense, but Jax, with Kobe, Amare, Marion, and Barbosa would kill people.

that being said, you put Nash on the Lakers and that team is a lot better IMO.

oh, and good lord, Big Game James was just KILLING Kobe Bryant on LA TV just now - pretty funny.
 

F-Dog

lurker
Joined
Aug 27, 2003
Posts
3,637
Reaction score
0
Location
Tucson
I kind of agree - people forget that when Kobe had talent, he was the facilitator for 3 title teams that were all damn near unbeatable. They wouldn't run this offense, but Jax, with Kobe, Amare, Marion, and Barbosa would kill people.
I think you mean, "when Shaq had talent, Kobe was the facilitator..."


I wouldn't guarantee that the Suns would be better or worse with Kobe, but IMO it's pretty clear the Lakers would be better with Nash. Hell, they'd even be better defensively, since they wouldn't have to carry Luke Walton as their starting SF with Nash distributing.
 

Cheesebeef

ASFN IDOL
Supporting Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2003
Posts
91,297
Reaction score
68,271
I think you mean, "when Shaq had talent, Kobe was the facilitator..."

does it really matter? Bottom line, when Kobe played with talented players he could trust, he did and he was the playmaker on a team that dominated. No one was calling Kobe selfish as he was dishing to Fisher, Horry and Fox and giving the ball up to Shaq as Shaq dominated. I really think Kobe gets a bad rap - not that he doesn't deserve a lot of it, but the guy HAS shown the ability to be a team player during his career.

that being said, I'm pretty damn happy Kupcake still has a job and has no clue how to put talent around him. Let him play one on one until the end of his career for all I care.
 

Espo

Lets Go Suns
Joined
Oct 18, 2003
Posts
1,664
Reaction score
0
Location
Chandler
This is game 1 of the series. I not worried about losing the first game of the sereis.

"The winner of the first game in a series ultimately takes the series 79% of the time."
I'll take the Suns odds over the Lakers right now.
 

azirish

ASFN Lifer
Joined
Jan 26, 2007
Posts
3,876
Reaction score
0
Location
Sun City
I was opposed to signing Kobe then because I felt he would never co-exist with Amare. Nothing has happened to change my mind.

Back to the subject...

Even if the Suns lost today, I'd still pick the Suns to win it. However, it would probably take seven games. IMHO, the game was close because Kobe went unconscious for a long period and the Suns shooting was just awful. Both teams are likely to show improvement in game two, but is it reasonable to assume the Lakers will have a huge improvement and the Suns will continue to play badly?

In statistics, there is a concept called "regression to the mean". What it means is that while individual events may be exceptionally high or exceptionally low, there is a tendency to return to the normal percentages. For example, if a 250 hitter gets hot for a couple of weeks and raises his average, you would predict he will follow it with a cold period unless there is some reason to believe he's made major changes in his swing.

Regession to the mean is why there are so few major upsets over seven game series in the NBA but lots of them in the NCAA tournament. Over seven games, the better team is extremely likely to win.

Are the Lakers the better team? Forget the woulda, coulda, shoulda stuff. Are they the better team? If they aren't, their chances of winning the series becomes even lower than the standard "78% of teams winning the first game go on to win the series" stuff.

It seems likely the Lakers will win a game, but nothing I've read ore seen convinces me they are the better team.
 

Chaplin

Better off silent
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
46,376
Reaction score
16,877
Location
Round Rock, TX
I was opposed to signing Kobe then because I felt he would never co-exist with Amare. Nothing has happened to change my mind.

Well, the last time Kobe was paired with a dominant big man, what happened? Oh, he won 3 championships.

It seems likely the Lakers will win a game, but nothing I've read ore seen convinces me they are the better team.

Tell that to Luke Walton, who after the loss said the Lakers were the better team. :confused:
 

MaoTosiFanClub

The problem
Joined
Oct 7, 2003
Posts
12,720
Reaction score
6,564
Location
Scottsdale, AZ
Kobe Bryant COULD average 8+ assists on the Lakers probably also.. That's not the argument.

This team would probably crumble under Bryant's ego.
Probably, but Bryant is not a PG and his role is to put the ball in the basket. Kobe is a shooting guard and there are no SG's in basketball that get that many assists (Kobe leads the NBA in assists by a SG by the way) because offensively they're out there to score.

And the last point is pure speculation. Kobe was on some pretty damn good teams for the better part of a decade and never brought them down. Bryant's last few teams have crumbled due to a lack of talent. This team would be just as dominant with Kobe instead of Nash, anyone who believes differently is looking at things through purple-tinted glasses.
 

F-Dog

lurker
Joined
Aug 27, 2003
Posts
3,637
Reaction score
0
Location
Tucson
does it really matter?

Of course it does. If you ask, "why didn't Nash play like this back in Dallas?", a big reason is that it wasn't his team.

I don't think you can use "second-banana Kobe" to prove very much about current Kobe.
 

TheHopToad

Россия отстой!
Joined
May 29, 2006
Posts
4,019
Reaction score
231
"The winner of the first game in a series ultimately takes the series 79% of the time."
We can only hope this follows through in the rest of the Western Conference series...
 

Errntknght

Registered User
Joined
Sep 24, 2002
Posts
6,342
Reaction score
319
Location
Phoenix
I'd guess if you swapped Nash and Kobe both teams would be considerably worse - Nash wouldn't be able to do his thing in PJ's triangle and Kobe would destroy the Suns chemistry.
 

dodie53

A. O. II
Joined
Jan 7, 2007
Posts
6,320
Reaction score
2
Location
Tondo, Manila
imo,

the suns would be much stronger if kobe was there instead of nash..

and the lamar will be an all-star because of nash
 

pokerface

ASFN Addict
Joined
May 20, 2004
Posts
5,369
Reaction score
807
I almost feel sorry for the Laker dude.....he seems to be buying heavily into some Kobe carisma messiah complex.

Guys be gentle on the poor fellow....after the Suns sweep he may not be on this earth much longer.

Drink my son...drink...:koolaid:
 

scotsman13

Registered User
Joined
Oct 21, 2002
Posts
1,418
Reaction score
0
Location
salt lake city
Well, the last time Kobe was paired with a dominant big man, what happened? Oh, he won 3 championships.


here i thought that the last time kobe was paired with a dominant big man in shaq, malone and payton he started this me first game and the lakers choked in the finals to the pistons. but maybe i am wrong :)
 

dreamcastrocks

Chopped Liver Moderator
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
Aug 19, 2005
Posts
46,247
Reaction score
11,850
here i thought that the last time kobe was paired with a dominant big man in shaq, malone and payton he started this me first game and the lakers choked in the finals to the pistons. but maybe i am wrong :)

The Lakers choked away that series when because Malone was hurt. With a healthy Malone, they win that series, IMO.
 

D-Dogg

A Whole New World
Supporting Member
Joined
Sep 10, 2003
Posts
44,919
Reaction score
876
Location
In The End Zone
The Lakers choked away that series when because Malone was hurt. With a healthy Malone, they win that series, IMO.

You are correct. Malone was the engine of that team. When he was out, they were not elite. And Payton sucked out loud in the Tri.
 

F-Dog

lurker
Joined
Aug 27, 2003
Posts
3,637
Reaction score
0
Location
Tucson
I'd guess if you swapped Nash and Kobe both teams would be considerably worse - Nash wouldn't be able to do his thing in PJ's triangle and Kobe would destroy the Suns chemistry.
If Phil Jackson can't build an offense around Steve Nash, he needs to turn in his Hall of Fame credential, don't you think? :lol:
 

nathan

ASFN Lifer
Supporting Member
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
4,891
Reaction score
4
Location
Alexandria, VA
Good game today. But watch out we are gonna pull an upset over you guys and win the series. Kobe did everything he could to win the game today but when his teamates step up we are gonna be rollin.

Thanks for the tip! I was planning on a decisive series victory for the Suns until I read your post. Now I know not to get my hopes up and will be better prepared for the bitterness of defeat that will come when Lakers win the series.
 

arthurracoon

The Cardinal Smiles
Joined
Dec 6, 2002
Posts
16,534
Reaction score
0
Location
Nashville
Thanks for the tip! I was planning on a decisive series victory for the Suns until I read your post. Now I know not to get my hopes up and will be better prepared for the bitterness of defeat that will come when Lakers win the series.

:biglaugh:
 

Latest posts

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
552,689
Posts
5,402,034
Members
6,313
Latest member
50 year card fan
Top