Great article on the entire Dragic situation by a BSOTS writer who has a reputation for writing good articles, Seth Pollack
http://www.brightsideofthesun.com/2015/2/25/8103507/phoenix-suns-goran-dragic-ryan-mcdonough
I honestly agree with every word even the ones talking about how we might even better in a better situation post-Dragic trade.
Sorry, but this article is ignorant and biased.
1) Faulty logic. Because a guy plays unselfish on the court, does not equate to his being unselfish off it. That and Dragic is a shot first PG, it's not like he's a top distributor on anything.
2) He's wrong in claiming Dragic came back to the Suns at a discount. I heard rumors of the Bobcats going to offer him $9m a season, but I've never seen proof that it actually happened. As far as I know, the Suns made the best offer. Now that said, he claims the Suns went too far? Is he joking? I guess that's the main point of this disagreement between Dragic sympathisers and those of us who believe he was wrong. I think it's ridiculous to tell an employer they are to cater to their employees. I don't care if they work in an ice cream parlor or are a professional athlete. IMO his actions were 100% wrong. The Suns can build the team and run the system they want. If he didn't like it, than perform your job and when your contract is up, move on. It's simple really, Dragic being unhappy does not mean the Suns were in the wrong.
3)Dragic calls the Suns liars. Does not say what they supposedly lied to him about. Dragic has never called an employer a liar to the media in the past, therefore he must be accurate and we must assume they did lie to him? This guy needs a class in critical thinking. His logic fails all over this article. Sad.
4) This clearly an opinion. One he doesn't defend. His saying so matter of fact does not make it so. I happen to 100% disagree with him and feel that thinking is very short sighted, but only time will tell who is correct.
5) He claims they hurt themselves, yet offers nothing of proof. Just a claim. More of his stating something as fact with zero support.