Suns are going to trade this years pick to the highest bidder. Bled is the PG
There are more good players in this draft than just PGs. Unless by this you mean trading down in which I could be OK with depending on how far of a drop we would be taking and who we would be losing out on by trading down.Suns are going to trade this years pick to the highest bidder. Bled is the PG
There are more good players in this draft than just PGs. Unless by this you mean trading down in which I could be OK with depending on how far of a drop we would be taking and who we would be losing out on by trading down.
Agreed, if the Suns should trade down for more assets, they should never trade down beyond the pool of top players.
Suns are going to trade this years pick to the highest bidder. Bled is the PG
not impressed by Ball against UofA.
also
xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
I'm of the opinion that will be hard to do. I'm not in agreement with the idea that there are 6 or 7 important players and the rest are just typical draft-ables.
I see so many guys like Jarrett Allen, Robert Williams, Johnathon Motley, Justin Patton, Ivan Rabb, Harry Giles, Miles Bridges, John Collins, OG Anunoby, TJ Leaf, Zach Collins that are being ignored as high picks and that's without considering the international talent.
I'd be surprised if at least 4 of those guys didn't make the top 10 in a years later redraft and wouldn't be shocked to see almost any two of them end up being among the 3 best from this class. And most of them will still be there after the first 10 are selected.
I like Isaac over Ball in this draft for the Suns. He's be the perfect 3
You watched an 18 second video to make your overall assessment of Ball? That's interesting...not impressed by Ball against UofA.
also
xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
I was quite impressed with Ball against UofA. He did what he always does and just made plays all over the place and was key to them winning despite an off shooting night. Oh and he had a very nice pull up mid range shot in that game as well...not impressed by Ball against UofA.
also
xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
Also looks like Lonzo's dad may have realized how dumb his "only for the Lakers" statement was..
http://www.espn.com/mens-college-ba...ar-lonzo-ball-only-playing-los-angeles-lakers
The only reason I would have any pause whatsoever about drafting Fultz is the fact that I don't see him playing along side Bledsoe. I think Ball could actually share the court with Bled and Book quite nicely.I like to judge players by one game, and even one single shot if possible
That being said, Fultz is almost certainly the consensus no 1 because of Ball's flaws but that suits me as i'm not expecting the first pick, instead hoping Ball falls to us at 2 or 3.
Question is though, if we do get the no1 pick, would I choose Fultz?
That's hard to say because I really like Ball ... funny that situations like this show that having the 1 pick can be more of a burden than a blessing sometimes.
The only reason I would have any pause whatsoever about drafting Fultz is the fact that I don't see him playing along side Bledsoe. I think Ball could actually share the court with Bled and Book quite nicely.
And I'd gladly trade Eric for a first rounder this year...little attachment to the guy in other words but if we keep him to mentor Ball or Fultz I'm good with that also.
I see no value in keeping him as a mentor but you grossly underestimate him as a player if you'd just accept any old first round pick for him. The hype over this class is justified but even still, odds are, few of us would make a deal like that if we had 10 years of hindsight in our pocket. Most of the prospects in this draft will fall short of Eric's level.
I just see little to love about Eric other than his stats - the name of the game is to win and we never do, triple doubles from Bledsoe or not. See what Cowheard said about Kentucky players....Talented but underwhelming and that's Bledsoe.
Slinslin mentioned a top 7 pick which I think is probably about right but maybe that's too much youth?
And you're right about the mentoring - J Kidd started his whole rookie season and Ball is probably good enough to do that as well.
Are we sure this was the real LaVar Ball after ESPN's embarassing gaffe yesterday? Hyping up an interview with Ball for half the game. Then showing "LaVar Ball and his wife" sitting in the crowd saying we'll speak to him after the break and you won't be disappointed. I'm sure I wasn't the only one yelling at the tv "That is NOT LaVar Ball. And it's not his mom, she's white." So ESPN came back and sheepishly claimed they had been "misinformed" and LaVar Ball wasn't actually there. No duh.
Can't believe their sideline reporter didn't know the guy wasn't LaVar.
Colin Cowherd is right occasionally but remember, he's the Howard Stern of sports talk shows. He doesn't take himself seriously, I don't know why anyone else would? Towns, Davis, Wall - these guys are legit stars but there's a reason you see 3 or more stars congregating on the same roster, it's because one man is never a team.
Us not winning isn't by any means squarely on the shoulders of Bledsoe. Sure he is part of it, but I would guess it is more that we are losing in spite of what he is doing.I only quote what he said because he said exactly what I was thinking - you only need to look at how little winning we do to realise he's (we're) probably right.