I think the Cards are Drafting Danny Shelton, DT, Washington in the first

SissyBoyFloyd

Pawnee, Skidi Clan
Joined
Feb 1, 2012
Posts
5,077
Reaction score
2,384
Location
Mesa, AZ
Eddie Goldman, DT, Fl St would be an excellent pick for us, and would be much more likely an available choice at 24. I can see a lot of discussion regarding him, Erving, and Gordon when we get OTC. As much as I would love to see Erving on our team, I think Goldman would be the smarter pick. Of course we are all wishing someone huge falls to us, but I am not betting on it.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Aug 7, 2008
Posts
10,461
Reaction score
7,416
Location
Chandler
I'm thinking this is the year they trade up for the pass rusher they've always wanted & needed. :D
 

juza76

ASFN Icon
Joined
Sep 5, 2009
Posts
13,798
Reaction score
9,618
Location
milan-italy
I'm thinking this is the year they trade up for the pass rusher they've always wanted & needed. :D
right
we cant ignore it anymore
last pass rusher we drafted in the 1st round was calvin pace
2nd rounder the big bust cody brown :(
 

WildBB

Yogi n da Bear
Joined
Mar 20, 2004
Posts
14,295
Reaction score
1,239
Location
The Sonoran Jungle - West
right
we cant ignore it anymore
last pass rusher we drafted in the 1st round was calvin pace
2nd rounder the big bust cody brown :(
Wow. you know what - it could be RB, T, C, NT, OLB, ILB or CB!

NO ONE really knows who the Cardinals are really targeting. Prior years we really could narrow it down more.

Without specific names I'd say they are looking hard #1 at:

1-OLB
2-RB
3-NT
4-OL
5-ILB
6-CB
 

juza76

ASFN Icon
Joined
Sep 5, 2009
Posts
13,798
Reaction score
9,618
Location
milan-italy
Wow. you know what - it could be RB, T, C, NT, OLB, ILB or CB!

NO ONE really knows who the Cardinals are really targeting. Prior years we really could narrow it down more.

Without specific names I'd say they are looking hard #1 at:

1-OLB
2-RB
3-NT
4-OL
5-ILB
6-CB
wild BB
the ideal should be,draft best players available,dont care about position too much
we did this mistake many times and i think they are still influenced about position of need
 
Last edited:

oaken1

Stone Cold
Supporting Member
Banned from P+R
Joined
Mar 13, 2004
Posts
18,197
Reaction score
16,296
Location
Modesto, California
Eddie Goldman, DT, Fl St would be an excellent pick for us, and would be much more likely an available choice at 24. I can see a lot of discussion regarding him, Erving, and Gordon when we get OTC. As much as I would love to see Erving on our team, I think Goldman would be the smarter pick. Of course we are all wishing someone huge falls to us, but I am not betting on it.



if Shelton is gone....I would have to look hard at other positions before I considered picking Goldman at 24.............. but I might still pick him.
 

az jam

ASFN Icon
Joined
Mar 6, 2004
Posts
12,989
Reaction score
5,215
Location
Scottsdale, AZ
Buyer beware!!
From Rotoworld.com

FSU DT Eddie Goldman performed poorly at his pro day, reports CBS Sports' Dane Brugler.
The testing numbers, not expected to be spectacular anyway for the 6-foot-4, 336-pound Goldman, were worse than anticipated. He posted a 5.30 forty, a poor 26" vertical jump and a horrible 19 repetitions on the bench press. All these numbers would have ranked amongst the dregs of the tested defensive lineman at the combine, and prospects typically test better at their pro days than in Indy.
 

WildBB

Yogi n da Bear
Joined
Mar 20, 2004
Posts
14,295
Reaction score
1,239
Location
The Sonoran Jungle - West
wild BB
the ideal should be,draft best players available,dont care about position too much
we did this mistake many times and i think they are still influenced about position of need

I agree. What I think is that they are looking to draft an OLB. If the guy (or two) they'd like isn't there then they are going to look at the RB's. If they're (Gurley and Gordon) not there then perhaps a NT or CB.
 

Cards Czar

The Bird is the Word
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
3,171
Reaction score
370
Location
Alton, Ill
Shelton wont get past the Browns at 19. They lost Rubin and that is a major need for them.
 

RugbyMuffin

ASFN IDOL
Joined
Apr 30, 2003
Posts
30,485
Reaction score
4,877
if Shelton is gone....I would have to look hard at other positions before I considered picking Goldman at 24.............. but I might still pick him.


+1 I think there is a host of other players to choose before Goldman, but that being said I would not be upset if he was the only option. Would not be jumping for joy either.
 

WisconsinCard

Herfin BIg Time
Joined
Apr 1, 2003
Posts
15,964
Reaction score
7,796
Location
In A Cigar Bar Near You
Buyer beware!!
From Rotoworld.com

FSU DT Eddie Goldman performed poorly at his pro day, reports CBS Sports' Dane Brugler.
The testing numbers, not expected to be spectacular anyway for the 6-foot-4, 336-pound Goldman, were worse than anticipated. He posted a 5.30 forty, a poor 26" vertical jump and a horrible 19 repetitions on the bench press. All these numbers would have ranked amongst the dregs of the tested defensive lineman at the combine, and prospects typically test better at their pro days than in Indy.

I really thought he would get his act together after the weak showing at the combine, and work real hard to impress on his pro-day. This puts him in the underachiever category for me. I would pass on him unless he is still there is the second round.
 
OP
OP
kerouac9

kerouac9

Klowned by Keim
Joined
Feb 14, 2003
Posts
38,419
Reaction score
29,823
Location
Gilbert, AZ
Shelton wont get past the Browns at 19. They lost Rubin and that is a major need for them.

The Browns signed Randy Starks in free agency. They have some deeper issues.

I agree. What I think is that they are looking to draft an OLB. If the guy (or two) they'd like isn't there then they are going to look at the RB's. If they're (Gurley and Gordon) not there then perhaps a NT or CB.

Robert Mays with Grantland thinks that the Cards may believe they have a proven system for generating a pass rush without a top rush linebacker. He feels like a center or guard might be a better option, because they can't depend on Jonathan Cooper (his words--"They don't know what he is as an NFL player yet") and there's plenty of value at RB later in the draft.

IMO, people who think the Cards are going after a running back in the first are going to feel as foolish as those who thought that Stefan Wisinewski was a top free agent overall or a free agent target for the Cards.
 

WildBB

Yogi n da Bear
Joined
Mar 20, 2004
Posts
14,295
Reaction score
1,239
Location
The Sonoran Jungle - West
The Browns signed Randy Starks in free agency. They have some deeper issues.



Robert Mays with Grantland thinks that the Cards may believe they have a proven system for generating a pass rush without a top rush linebacker. He feels like a center or guard might be a better option, because they can't depend on Jonathan Cooper (his words--"They don't know what he is as an NFL player yet") and there's plenty of value at RB later in the draft.

IMO, people who think the Cards are going after a running back in the first are going to feel as foolish as those who thought that Stefan Wisinewski was a top free agent overall or a free agent target for the Cards.

It is a deep draft for RB. I was telling juza that this draft is hard to pin down what they're looking for early. I think it's completely fluid this year, with the options of trading up or down also very viable.

With the CAP room they have, trading for Peterson also makes some sense. So more reason they won't burn a 1st on a RB, mtl.
 

oaken1

Stone Cold
Supporting Member
Banned from P+R
Joined
Mar 13, 2004
Posts
18,197
Reaction score
16,296
Location
Modesto, California
as far as RB goes it really does depend on exactly what the staff wants to do....

do they want to compliment Juke??...ie. get some serious thunder to go with his lightening??
if that is the case then there are only two backs in the draft....and Gurley is the only one to consider at #24.

or do they want to emphasize the offense and add another back with the same skill sets as juke?? so, as the coach stated, "The offense does not have to change"??

if this is the case there are plenty of backs to be had between rds 2 and 4 who can make an impact.....but not so sure Gordon fits this mold.....IMO he will be a solid NFL back...just not so sure this offense wants to do the things that Gordon does........
have to give the kid credit though...he has been hitting as many spots as he can marketing himself...says he can move a pile just as well as Gurley can...but he is quicker....trying to bolster his draft position....smart kid.
 

RugbyMuffin

ASFN IDOL
Joined
Apr 30, 2003
Posts
30,485
Reaction score
4,877
He feels like a center or guard might be a better option, because they can't depend on Jonathan Cooper (his words--"They don't know what he is as an NFL player yet") and there's plenty of value at RB later in the draft.

If the is the case, then Erving or Flowers are my favorites! That is if they are there.

Also, what in the hell happened to Jonathan Cooper ?
 

juza76

ASFN Icon
Joined
Sep 5, 2009
Posts
13,798
Reaction score
9,618
Location
milan-italy
If the is the case, then Erving or Flowers are my favorites! That is if they are there.

Also, what in the hell happened to Jonathan Cooper ?

this is a big year for him
does cooper have passion for football?
does he want to train ,getting better and become an important piece of this offensive line?
the fact he had problem coming back from a minor injury could show is less desire or eager to become a great football player imo
 
Last edited:

GoldGloveschmidt

ASFN Lifer
Joined
Aug 29, 2013
Posts
4,285
Reaction score
7,051
this is a big year for him
does cooper have passion for football?
does he want to train ,getting better and become an important piece of this offensive line?
the fact he had problem coming back from a minor injury could show is less desire or eager to become a great football player imo

That he's spent the off-season training at o-line world instead of vacationing tells me he wants to be in the starting lineup.
 

Catfish

Registered
Joined
Aug 14, 2006
Posts
4,551
Reaction score
64
K-9-------if he falls to us like Dan Williams did-------you may be right with this one.
I just saw an interview with him after his pro day and he is not at all like big Dan was. This guy at 340 moves like 270----he does not appear to be fat--just solid and strong and quick--------he also looks to have some real serious macho to him too. If he falls anywhere close to us we might be wise to go after him------looks like he could handle our middle (3 downs), for a long long time. Would be a very solid pick IMO'
 

Cardiac

ASFN Icon
Joined
Jul 21, 2002
Posts
12,062
Reaction score
3,331
The Browns signed Randy Starks in free agency. They have some deeper issues.

Yes the Browns have many issues and may even try and trade up for a QB. Thing is they were dead last in stopping the run last year so Shelton makes a ton of sense.


Robert Mays with Grantland thinks that the Cards may believe they have a proven system for generating a pass rush without a top rush linebacker. He feels like a center or guard might be a better option, because they can't depend on Jonathan Cooper (his words--"They don't know what he is as an NFL player yet") and there's plenty of value at RB later in the draft.

IMO, people who think the Cards are going after a running back in the first are going to feel as foolish as those who thought that Stefan Wisinewski was a top free agent overall or a free agent target for the Cards.

I agree with Robert Mays that SK isn't fretting over not getting a top rush LBer. If one is there that has good value at that point then sure but I don't see him trading up to get one. Also fully agree that the RB class is deep so can't imagine us taking a RB in rd1 and highly doubt we grab one in rd2 unless BA is dealing out BS as he has done from time to time.
 

Jetstream Green

Kool Aid with a touch of vodka
Joined
Feb 5, 2003
Posts
29,477
Reaction score
16,651
Location
San Antonio, Texas
Jordan Phillips might be the solution for us at NT in the late 2nd, the man has prototypical size and with proper coaching could be excellent :)
 

MadCardDisease

Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
20,813
Reaction score
14,778
Location
Chandler, Az
Robert Mays with Grantland thinks that the Cards may believe they have a proven system for generating a pass rush without a top rush linebacker. He feels like a center or guard might be a better option, because they can't depend on Jonathan Cooper (his words--"They don't know what he is as an NFL player yet") and there's plenty of value at RB later in the draft.

IMO, people who think the Cards are going after a running back in the first are going to feel as foolish as those who thought that Stefan Wisinewski was a top free agent overall or a free agent target for the Cards.


I highly doubt the Cardinals go after a Guard or Center with their first pick. Also I agree that Shelton would be a solid pick if he falls. I think in the first round they target the BPA from the following (Pass Rusher, CB, NT or OT). I think a player that the Cardinals are high on from one of those 4 positions will fall to the Cards and they will use thier first rounder on them. If one of them doesn't drop they will trade out of the spot.

I agree the Cards won't look at a RB in the first.
 

GuernseyCard

ASFN Icon
Joined
Dec 29, 2012
Posts
10,123
Reaction score
5,681
Location
London UK
I highly doubt the Cardinals go after a Guard or Center with their first pick. Also I agree that Shelton would be a solid pick if he falls. I think in the first round they target the BPA from the following (Pass Rusher, CB, NT or OT). I think a player that the Cardinals are high on from one of those 4 positions will fall to the Cards and they will use thier first rounder on them. If one of them doesn't drop they will trade out of the spot.

I agree the Cards won't look at a RB in the first.

Gurley or Gordon are on the board, and they don't look?

C'mon man!
 

WildBB

Yogi n da Bear
Joined
Mar 20, 2004
Posts
14,295
Reaction score
1,239
Location
The Sonoran Jungle - West
Gurley or Gordon are on the board, and they don't look?

C'mon man!

Gurley would be a no brainer for me. Gordon, I think you can get his equal a bit later or no severe drop off.

They'd have to be a little patient with Gurley, but he could be the franchise. You don't see that @ pick 24.
 
Last edited:
Top