You guys missed the most obvious comparison, though I believe comparisons often mislead & cause confusion. I think Fitz is the best comp. They’re about the same speed & height. Fitz is heavier, but CeeDee will add more muscle. Both have great hands and body control. They also both excel at YAC. Their most important shared quality is that both believe constant improvement is the key part of the job. Someone above mentioned press coverage. That was a problem for Lamb, but last offseason he did a significant amount of strength conditioning and it’s not believed to be a big issue any longer. Getting Lamb with Fitz as a mentor would keep Fitz around and boost Lamb. The are no guarantees Lamb equals Fitz, but he’s the closest I’ve seen in recent years.
I feel like I have seen how this plays out...we get a decent QB, and instead of upgrading our people to protect them, we give them more weapons which still leads them to getting the crap kicked out of them, getting injured, and shortening our window.#PlummerWarnerPalmerThis is one of those "it just makes too much sense" things. The Cards need to surround Murray with weapons. Murray is familiar with Lamb. The Cards need to replace Fitz. Lamb is an elite talent.
I’m not sure where you’re getting Lamb is fast. Speed is some people’s knock on him. He likely runs 4.45 to 4.55. Forget the people who think Fitz ran 4.65. He was clocked at 4.5 on several occasions. As to shifty, I’d say that describes Fitz whose strength is often YAC. As to strength, Fitz is unquestionably stronger, but Lamb has moved this forward in the last year by focused training. Both have the seldom seen ability to contort their bodies when covered to make a play. I know Fitz has mentored several guys, but none more talented than Lamb.Fitzgerald and Lamb are the exact opposite type of player. The only thing they have in common is they play WR. Fitz was always regarded as a big strong go up and get it jump ball type while Lamb is more shifty and speedy.
the whole Fitz will mentor him thing is funny to me. How many times have guys said that.
The only other high draft pick that Fitz mentored was Floyd and he was looking quite promising early on. He ended up fizzling out more so due to off field issues than on.I’m not sure where you’re getting Lamb is fast. Speed is some people’s knock on him. He likely runs 4.45 to 4.55. Forget the people who think Fitz ran 4.65. He was clocked at 4.5 on several occasions. As to shifty, I’d say that describes Fitz whose strength is often YAC. As to strength, Fitz is unquestionably stronger, but Lamb has moved this forward in the last year by focused training. Both have the seldom seen ability to contort their bodies when covered to make a play. I know Fitz has mentored several guys, but none more talented than Lamb.
I'd argue Fitz is less of a positional mentor than a mentor on how to play the game, and maintain your body. He's not a coach on the field, just doing his thing and showing younger generations how to prepare week in and week out. Kirk even acknowledged it in an interview.The only other high draft pick that Fitz mentored was Floyd and he was looking quite promising early on. He ended up fizzling out more so due to off field issues than on.
the whole Fitz will mentor him thing is funny to me. How many times have guys said that.
Fitzgerald and Lamb are the exact opposite type of player. The only thing they have in common is they play WR. Fitz was always regarded as a big strong go up and get it jump ball type while Lamb is more shifty and speedy.
the whole Fitz will mentor him thing is funny to me. How many times have guys said that.
What you just described is not diggs. Diggs is not a great route runner or blocker. He’s mire straight line speed. Diggs is a terrible comp for lamb.Mike Evans is like 6'5. Lamb is 6'2"
Lamb lacks elite top end speed and is more of a fluid route runner / receiver. He is very strong and a great blocker. I see a bigger Stefon Diggs. Some say D'Andre Hopkins but that is a crazy comparison
Um, no.What you just described is not diggs. Diggs is not a great route runner or blocker. He’s mire straight line speed. Diggs is a terrible comp for lamb.
On face value, I like it. I think Higgins is a first rounder in most years. I also won't be shocked if Laviska Shenault is there in round 2 as well who I think would be an amazing fit in our offense.Thoughts on Wirfs then Tee Higgins as the first two picks? @Chopper0080
I just want impact players in round 1. If the best player available is a WR than I am all for it. Never pass on elite talent to reach for a more pressing need.It just boggles the mind that people are wanting a WR in RD 1.This team has too many other needs that should be priorities IMHO.Defense duh.
The "elite talent" is going to be a skill position player 99% of the time. We've gotta invest in the lines sometime. Lamb won't be very exciting to watch when it's Brett Hundley throwing to him.I just want impact players in round 1. If the best player available is a WR than I am all for it. Never pass on elite talent to reach for a more pressing need.
I just want impact players in round 1. If the best player available is a WR than I am all for it. Never pass on elite talent to reach for a more pressing need.
.With the defensive impact players likely available in the top 10 Cards would be total ********* to go WR again.If its close between as defensive guy or a WR as a RD 1 type impact player you need to go defense IMO.All the bitching this year about KM did his thing and the defense let us down mantra counts for jackshit if the Cards screw around and draft a WR in RD 1.
Okay and if a defensive or offensive line talent is on or at least close to the same level of the top receiver on the board than go for it.With the defensive impact players likely available in the top 10 Cards would be total ********* to go WR again.If its close between as defensive guy or a WR as a RD 1 type impact player you need to go defense IMO.All the bitching this year about KM did his thing and the defense let us down mantra counts for jackshit if the Cards screw around and draft a WR in RD 1
We have such a long way to go in this process that I don't want to belabor the point too much, any of these guys could be 2nd round picks after bad workouts or further analytics. We're just so bad at DL and OL that I can't envision drafting another WR. Especially with the risk that they turn into another Corey Davis/Mike Williams/John Ross like the last receivers picked in the top 10. All guys who have very little impact on their team but were supposed to be game changers.Okay and if a defensive or offensive line talent is on or at least close to the same level of the top receiver on the board than go for it.
I am not suggesting we should just draft a WR no matter what, but if he is without a doubt the best prospect on the board we should take him.
We have multiple other picks and $70m in free agency to fill needs with and thus we shouldn't reach in round 1 just because of a need.
Okay and if a defensive or offensive line talent is on or at least close to the same level of the top receiver on the board than go for it.
I am not suggesting we should just draft a WR no matter what, but if he is without a doubt the best prospect on the board we should take him.
We have multiple other picks and $70m in free agency to fill needs with and thus we shouldn't reach in round 1 just because of a need.