Im Sorry, But Lance Long Sucks

Status
Not open for further replies.

joeshmo

Kangol Hat Aficionado
Joined
Feb 23, 2004
Posts
17,247
Reaction score
1
Edit - Never mind, dont want to keep the flame going, this thread is already long enough.
 
Last edited:

Chris_Sanders

Not Always The Best Moderator
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
Sep 14, 2002
Posts
40,179
Reaction score
31,714
Location
Scottsdale, Az
Pretty bad, huh? We've learned that people can anonymously say that public figures suck, but we can't say anonymous fans suck.

This is a "Discuss the Arizona Cardinals and their players board"

It is not a "Come here and tell people they suck for those opinions board"

If you don't like it, you are welcome to post elsewhere.
 

PoolBoy

BIRDGANG
Joined
Jun 13, 2007
Posts
5,734
Reaction score
0
Location
Sec. 450
It is seniority because some have bragged about that. And, when I present facts, people choose to ignore them and present arguments that have no foundation. Also, they've threatened to ban me for accurately portraying my view of the situation (about "fans"), but it is okay to trash people (Long and Whisenhunt) publically on the site - there has been no question about that. It is "seniority" - thank you moklerman.

you have presented no facts, and you're passive aggressiveness is getting real old already. As joeschmo just stated and as others have tried to tell you, Lance Long did not have a good preseason. At all. Not once did he make a play that your run of the mill college walk on couldn't make. He certainly didn't show off his 40 time speed (no, the 42 yard return doesn't count because it was sllllopppy, and that's not his role on this team anyways). And yes, I will talk about seniority because I didn't come on the board, and no one else has, coming on talking about "how this board is run....". If you're already complaining, just leave now.
 

GFTempleton

Newbie
BANNED BY MODERATORS
Joined
Sep 7, 2009
Posts
21
Reaction score
0
you have presented no facts, and you're passive aggressiveness is getting real old already. As joeschmo just stated and as others have tried to tell you, Lance Long did not have a good preseason. At all. Not once did he make a play that your run of the mill college walk on couldn't make. He certainly didn't show off his 40 time speed (no, the 42 yard return doesn't count because it was sllllopppy, and that's not his role on this team anyways). And yes, I will talk about seniority because I didn't come on the board, and no one else has, coming on talking about "how this board is run....". If you're already complaining, just leave now.

If I said the above, I would be threatened or booted, right? How is the above comment acceptable, but saying a Cardinals player "sucks" is perfectly acceptable? Just a good question.
 

GFTempleton

Newbie
BANNED BY MODERATORS
Joined
Sep 7, 2009
Posts
21
Reaction score
0
you have presented no facts...

These are really all the facts you need:

"Long did turn some heads at Mississippi State's pro day though when he reeled off a 4.38 forty and had the fastest shuttle time of anyone in the country." From: http://www.revengeofthebirds.com/2008/6/23/556891/lance-long-and-his-future

Is this the drop everyone is talking about? Looks like interference to me and the official agreed:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bqL42Bbz1XI&feature=related

And, this guy has a pretty good football resume:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ken_Whisenhunt
 

joeshmo

Kangol Hat Aficionado
Joined
Feb 23, 2004
Posts
17,247
Reaction score
1
If I said the above, I would be threatened or booted, right?

No.

What exactly did he say that was wrong?

Someone getting so hurt because they said someone sucks. Like fans are supposed to think all 53 players are awesome without faults or something. Would you be as hurt about the whole thing if he said "I am sorry but Lance Long isnt any good", both say exactly the same things just different adjectives. If you saw that in your goodle search you never would have come here in the first place. All this over one silly adjective.

You have got to be a family member or his best friend, because no person would go so crazy over the word "suck" otherwise.
 

Linderbee

Let's GO, CARDINALS!
Supporting Member
Joined
Jun 27, 2005
Posts
29,146
Reaction score
2,654
Location
MESA! :thud:
If I said the above, I would be threatened or booted, right? How is the above comment acceptable, but saying a Cardinals player "sucks" is perfectly acceptable? Just a good question.
If you said the above, you would be just fine.

It's when you speak disparagingly about the members of this board that gets you in trouble.
 

joeshmo

Kangol Hat Aficionado
Joined
Feb 23, 2004
Posts
17,247
Reaction score
1
These are really all the facts you need:

"Long did turn some heads at Mississippi State's pro day though when he reeled off a 4.38 forty and had the fastest shuttle time of anyone in the country." From: http://www.revengeofthebirds.com/2008/6/23/556891/lance-long-and-his-future

Is this the drop everyone is talking about? Looks like interference to me and the official agreed:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bqL42Bbz1XI&feature=related

And, this guy has a pretty good football resume:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ken_Whisenhunt

Why do you continue to use his pro day as your evidence. If he turned so many heads why was he never drafted. If his pro day was so awesome, why not get drafted. It goes to show just how far down on the list of things scouts worry, timed speeds really is. Also he has had 3 total drops in preseason and no that youtube clip or the TD pass in the GB game dont count in that total. That is the total as stated by a local radio cards insider. And you said he didnt have any fumbles, try again, Muffed punt against the Packers = fumble.

As for the Wiz evidence that only goes so far, I trust the guy but no one is infalible.
 

82CardsGrad

7 x 70
Joined
Dec 31, 2004
Posts
36,148
Reaction score
8,072
Location
Scottsdale
Based on his Pro Day, there is no doubt in my mind that Long is about to put up a Pro Bowl season!

See in Hawaii GFTempleton!!

;)
 
Joined
Nov 15, 2002
Posts
13,301
Reaction score
1,175
Location
SE Valley
If you said the above, you would be just fine.

It's when you speak disparagingly about the members of this board that gets you in trouble.
GFT, being new to the board, it is understandable that you don't realize that many of the persons that participate here are not simply "anonymous fans". Many posters here are friends which have shared tailgates, activities, celebrations and even funerals together.

So stick around, get to know us and though it won't make you smarter, it will give you a better understanding of accepted etiquette herein. And yes, additional privilege, and leeway, does come with seniority and shared experiences!
 

PoolBoy

BIRDGANG
Joined
Jun 13, 2007
Posts
5,734
Reaction score
0
Location
Sec. 450
If I said the above, I would be threatened or booted, right? How is the above comment acceptable, but saying a Cardinals player "sucks" is perfectly acceptable? Just a good question.

These are really all the facts you need:

"Long did turn some heads at Mississippi State's pro day though when he reeled off a 4.38 forty and had the fastest shuttle time of anyone in the country." From: http://www.revengeofthebirds.com/2008/6/23/556891/lance-long-and-his-future

Is this the drop everyone is talking about? Looks like interference to me and the official agreed:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bqL42Bbz1XI&feature=related

And, this guy has a pretty good football resume:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ken_Whisenhunt

I didn't say anything untrue, why are you still here complaining? A 40 time doesn't mean anything, again, or else Michael Johnson would have been the greatest NFL player of the 90's and Usain Bolt would be a 2 time MVP already. And no, the youtube link is not what we are talking about, because that is not a drop.

But it is interesting to note that his highlights for the game of the video you posted were him getting lit up, a 6 yard punt return, and a drop in the endzone.
 

DieHardCardFan

Dallas 2011
Joined
Oct 8, 2003
Posts
1,973
Reaction score
0
Location
Ahwatukee
There is absolutly zero reason this guy is on the team.. Why? He didnt show he belonged.. Did I miss something? I dont see the love for him from the fans? Because he's a little white dude fans want him around? Cherbet was around because they had no other options.. We have Q, Fitz and Stevie.. Makes no damn sense having this many WR's..

Im more worried by this decsion than anything.. I hope Lance can rush the QB since we need some LB's..
For F's sake waht the hell? Kurt cant even hit Fitz, much less a tiny white dude .. So are we gonna line up 6 or 7 WR's? this year?

aaaggghhh

What in the hell does him being white have to do with anything? Come on GEE you know if someone posted something like that the other way around you would lose your mind, and you are white.

I like the dudes hustle and heart and maybe Whis sees potential in the kid? I dont know but I would agree that O Jones was a much much better fit!
 

AsUdUdE

ASFN Lifer
Joined
Jun 24, 2005
Posts
3,375
Reaction score
44
Evidence of performance include:
1) 46 yard kick return
2) catches in last preseason
3) catches in this preseason (got robbed of a TD in the back of the end zone)
4) Whis kept him

You guys have no evidence he sucks. He hasn't fumbled. He hasn't dropped passes. He does have freaky physical attributes, works hard, and you anonymous haters have only proven to be backstabbing fans. I wish Whis could cut you guys loose for your poor performance.

I just want to know how you managed to get -1450 ASFN money...
 

JJDynomite

Newbie
BANNED BY MODERATORS
Joined
Sep 9, 2009
Posts
1
Reaction score
0
I didn't say anything untrue, why are you still here complaining?

But it is interesting to note that his highlights for the game of the video you posted were him getting lit up, a 6 yard punt return, and a drop in the endzone.

The final catch in the endzone was a drop? He clearly caught the ball. Your statement, X-Lax, is therefore untrue.
 

moklerman

Rise from the Ashes III
Joined
Mar 23, 2005
Posts
5,318
Reaction score
810
Location
Bakersfield, CA
The only issue I have with this thread is the "If you disagree with me you aren't a real fan" comment.

There is no place for that on this site or in any conversation. Such comments only lead to flame wars and discourage real discourse, as it has done in this thread.

It would be the same if he had 10 posts or 1000.
Obviously GFT has lost his mind by now but I feel like he was prodded into losing it.

I don't think it's much of a stretch for a new member to question the thoughts posted that started this thread. I still think "Card's player haters should root for some other team" is pretty ambiguous. The guy was just frustrated because not even his "Lance Long runs a 4.3, 40" was taken as factual when I'm pretty sure he posted a link backing up the statement.

The part about Long not fumbling was also something that could have been taken for what it's worth. As a WR, he didn't fumble and I'm pretty sure the conversation was about the WR depth chart.

I'm in 100% agreement with you about flame wars but I think GFT was offering coherent thoughts--biased as they might have been, for most of the conversation. I could just as easily be disappointed in many of the members here for not being the "bigger man"(or woman). Instead of ripping a new guy to shreds for passionately defending a Cardinal player and the coach, he could have been offered the same toleration that the original post got.

Maybe he hadn't "earned" that privelage but there's also benefit of doubt.

Oh well, just 2 cents from a relatively outside perspective.
 

Duckjake

LEGACY MEMBER
LEGACY MEMBER
Joined
Jun 10, 2002
Posts
32,190
Reaction score
317
Location
Texas
Obviously GFT has lost his mind by now but I feel like he was prodded into losing it.

I don't think it's much of a stretch for a new member to question the thoughts posted that started this thread. I still think "Card's player haters should root for some other team" is pretty ambiguous. The guy was just frustrated because not even his "Lance Long runs a 4.3, 40" was taken as factual when I'm pretty sure he posted a link backing up the statement.

The part about Long not fumbling was also something that could have been taken for what it's worth. As a WR, he didn't fumble and I'm pretty sure the conversation was about the WR depth chart.

I'm in 100% agreement with you about flame wars but I think GFT was offering coherent thoughts--biased as they might have been, for most of the conversation. I could just as easily be disappointed in many of the members here for not being the "bigger man"(or woman). Instead of ripping a new guy to shreds for passionately defending a Cardinal player and the coach, he could have been offered the same toleration that the original post got.

Maybe he hadn't "earned" that privelage but there's also benefit of doubt.a

Oh well, just 2 cents from a relatively outside perspective.

How much of an outside perspective is it when you were recently banned when a moderator decided you were getting carried away defending your favorite player?

This poster got carried away as well. All he/she had to do was offer the "coherent" arguments without blasting the people who post here. Especially since no one other than Gee said Long "sucks" or wondered if he was only on the team because he was White. They just put up arguments that he wasn't very good compared to other NFL players and that combine numbers didn't translate to NFL success etc.

This thread is not really about Lance Long it is about what is acceptable behavior on this board that is why it is so "long".
 

moklerman

Rise from the Ashes III
Joined
Mar 23, 2005
Posts
5,318
Reaction score
810
Location
Bakersfield, CA
How much of an outside perspective is it when you were recently banned when a moderator decided you were getting carried away defending your favorite player?
"Outsider" as in, outside the clubhouse looking in. I'm a long time member but not one of the club. I pretty much know how things are around here but am not part of the "us", I'm part of the "them".

I wasn't saying I am unfamiliar with being banned nor was I saying that the poster didn't earn his break. I just thought I'd offer my "outsider" thoughts as a different perspective that this situation could be viewed.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top