IF you had said I prefer money over winning we wouldn't have had this back and forth in the first place.
We're not going to agree because you think Joe Johnson making more money is better than Horry winning 7 titles.
He's having a great debut I'll give you that. He got exactly what he wanted so far he's got total freedom on the court.
Fair enough, most of this is dependent on how you view Harden.
Considering he's a two guard who can create his own shot and set up others, (while also being a decent defender) I think he's a guy you can build around. You'll need two other star caliber players, but I also think there are plenty of guys that would want to play with James, and with a top 10 (hopefully 5) pick, you'd at least have 2 guys you feel you can build around.
At the very least, you'd have 1, which is better than our current 0.
I'd love to have Harden on this team. I think a Dragic, Harden, Gortat trio could really grow into something. I just don't know how you put enough talent around him if you have to start with a bare cupboard, especially if you have to give up draft picks too.
Steve
If I am Dwight Howard I'd seriously consider leaving the Lakers for the Rockets to team up with Harden and the rest of their youth.
Building around Harden when you are left with caproom should not be that hard, sure you still need true a franchise player to really win a title but it is a start.
Paying Harden the max and then paying 7-9M$ per for a bunch of only above average players is what makes it hard.
In the NBA you rarely win paying 5 guys 10M$, you are better off paying 3 guys 15 each and 2 for 2.5 each.
It's hard for me to begrudge anyone taking what they consider to be a better job offer. I think people overreact when they say someone just cares about the money, or they want to be the man. More likely it's just partially those things: he now a has better wage and more seniority. People go to "lesser" companies all the time for those sorts of things.
In any case, I would have liked to have seen him in a Suns jersey, and I sure wouldn't have been complaining about him wanting to be the man then. That would be one of the main reasons to want him on your team.
Harden, Lin and Asik are owed about $40 million for the 2013-2014 season (46 the next year) and the salary cap is estimate to be about 60 million that year. They have about 8 other contracts through at least next season for about $13 million, for a total of $53 million in salaries for the 2013-2014 season. That leaves $7 million for Howard. They have no trable assets to get Hoaward that will equal in salary/talent. No one is going to touch Asik or Lin at those numbers and the rest are role players that made average money.
Howard to Houston will never happen. He will be very limited if he wants to win and get paid.
I'd love to have Harden on this team. I think a Dragic, Harden, Gortat trio could really grow into something. I just don't know how you put enough talent around him if you have to start with a bare cupboard, especially if you have to give up draft picks too.
Steve
From where we were 5 years ago, Sarver has completely sucked the life out of this franchise. Hate to be negative, but it's so aggravating to have my favorite team completely marginalized, with so little hope for the future.
The only silver lining in all of this is that we'll be bad enough to at least get a future star in the draft. I really see no other reason for optimism.
Oh I agree, and people also routinely willingly take paycuts so their company won't have a layoff. or forego accruing vacation time etc.
I guess what bothers me is the focus isn't on winning it's on other things. Not just harden, look at all the ripping LeBron took for going to Miami, oh he's just admitting he can't win without a guy like Wade, Jordan or Bird would never do that. He willingly chose to go to a team that would win. Now I hated the announcement and how he didn't notifiy Cleveland, but I had no real issue with him choosing to go a team that gave him a better chance of winning.
He's not a bad guy for doing it and he clearly has the situation he wanted.
This is pretty clearly a team that's going nowhere. The stadium was HALF FULL on opening night, and I can only imagine that getting worse as the year goes on.
But if I were already making $10 million a year, I personally would have no interest in changing to a less satisfying job that paid $15 million. $10 million a year is much, much more than I could ever come up with any way of spending, investing, leaving to heirs, or anything else. As a sum of money for a person and his family, it's hardly any different from infinity, to my way of thinking. But others are going to say, jeez, the difference between $10 million and $15 million is huge, and how can you turn that down? To each his own.
Altough they offered like 3000 tickets in give away promotions I heard..
Good points, and of course it's interesting how now that LeBron has won (and in dominating fashion) the narrative has changed from "he'd rather be a sidekick and can't handle the pressure" to "he's now competing for immortality." In the end, it was more the presentation of The Decision that bugs me. Just a sickening display. But I digress...
I do take SunsTzu's earlier point seriously about this contract being a baseline for Harden's next contract, too. Harden, like any star NBA player, is probably looking for another multi-year deal after this one, followed by something like a solid 2-year deal after that if his body holds up. So if I were Harden and my agent and financial advisors rolled out the long-term plan, it would make a lot of sense.
But I'll also go on record to say that if Harden re-signed for less because he wanted to win with the Thunder, I would ABSOLUTELY have applauded it. I really think there's something to be said for one-franchise careers if you can make it happen, too. In fact, the player who I think made the most short-sighted move recently was Pujols. Talk about leaving long-term endoresement money on the table. His grandkids wouldn't have had to pick up the check for a meal in St. Louis...
I understand where you guys are coming from, but for all he knows he could get injured a couple years from now and never be able to play basketball again. Fact is there is a big difference between 4 years/52m and 5 years/80m especially when you are looking to secure the future of your family for as long into the future as possible.I totally agree, and while I haven't been in the situation, I'm quite confident I'd stick with a perfect situation and the chance to compete for multiple titles instead of just going for the higher paycheck.
That said, the explanation I always get for the athlete rationale is that it's a matter of respect, and most of them would rather be in a worse situation than swallow their pride. Petty to me, but obviously not my concern.
I don't pass judgment one way or the other. Some people want to accumulate as much wealth as they can. I'd bet that, for everyone on this board, the opportunity to start earning twice as much money tomorrow would be awfully difficult to pass up, because we're all in income ranges where each dollar really matters.
But if I were already making $10 million a year, I personally would have no interest in changing to a less satisfying job that paid $15 million. $10 million a year is much, much more than I could ever come up with any way of spending, investing, leaving to heirs, or anything else. As a sum of money for a person and his family, it's hardly any different from infinity, to my way of thinking. But others are going to say, jeez, the difference between $10 million and $15 million is huge, and how can you turn that down? To each his own.
And to be fair that's why I said to Suntzu if he'd said it was about the money(and admittedly it's not JUST the money) I wouldn't have debated.
But I do see the other side of it, technically both Durant and Westbrook could have left 1.5-2 million on the table for Harden and Ibaka and made it easier.
Fact is there is a big difference between 4 years/52m and 5 years/80m especially when you are looking to secure the future of your family for as long into the future as possible.
With 52 million dollars, (even considering tax), I'd imagine with some conservative investment, you can secure the futures of the next 5 generations with ease.
You would think so but so many athletes don't that I guess I can see why agents advise them to get the most they can. ESPN had a special on this not that long ago it's remarkable how many athletes go bankrupt within 5 years of retiring.
the most common reason is when they're making the money, they spend it, on their family, friends, multiple houses, cars etc. Once they lose the income, they still have all those bills, the friends don't go turn the car in once the guy ends his career etc.
They're also of course notoriously bad at things like prenuptial agreements, having kids with multiple women etc which all kills their wallet.
I always hope the next generation will learn that lesson and protect themselves because honestly the guy who's going to do that is going to do that no matter how much he earns. Hopefully harden and his generation have learned they're making enormous amounts of money.