Ayup, sad to say.
You absolutely can have it both ways. I am pleased with the production and leadership he has given this team through 7 games, helping us to a 7-0 record. I was more than willing to give Keim credit because he took a giant risk and it appeared to be panning out. Unfortunately, that giant risk has now backfired, and we're left with a gaping hole that he had no backup plan for. When you push all in on an aging, oft-injured star, you often lose all your chips. So, we can be happy that we got a great 7 games out of him and still burn Keim for a risky strategy that has now backfired.
Absolutely. I've loved having JJ on the team for 7 games. We are absolutely screwed on the DL without him, though, and have nobody to adequately replace him. The added risk in risky signings is when you don't hedge against your bets. Keim didn't. We'll see what he can do to get out of a problem of his own making.