CardsFan88
ASFN Addict
- Joined
- May 28, 2002
- Posts
- 7,597
- Reaction score
- 4,664
Our tackles suck so bad, they'd win a competition about that against hookers...umm hands down.
We are risking having one shot QB right now. I'd rather not have three shot QB's, because they too will have to play behind our Community College Reserve Tackles.
This is not an endorsement of Kolb, it's just a realization that when the pressure is behind our QB before he even finishes dropping back (or close to that) on a consistent basis, no QB will do well.
We need to use 6 oline, and deal with whatever that takes away from our offense the rest of the season. Hell I'd try even 7 if need be....and a rb to chip. I'd rather have a qb have a chance to throw to two receivers, than not have a chance to even drop back but have more receivers.
We simply do not have a line to be able to drop back and pass with 5 olinemen this year. That's simply a fact.
The only real judgement we can make about Kolb, is that he absolutely sucks behind a line with the worst tackles of at least this century. You can't gleam too much from that, or else you risk shooting yourself in the foot because of putting the emotion colored lenses on. Tom Brady, Peyton Manning, Dan Marino, Joe Montana, insert ANY QB in here, would suck behind a line with our tackles. Mike Vick would have to run 70 percent of the time behind our line. Our tackles suck that bad.
Our GM at the very least, and perhaps our coaches as well, deserve the blame for not recognizing this fact. I'm not for shell shocking another QB, and I think Kolb has a toughness to keep sticking his nose in there. But I'd rather not risk Rosenbach'ing him. I sure wouldn't want to expose Skelton or Bartel to it as well.
We must consistently use 6 ol, or else we risk everything snowballing out of control, if it hasn't already started that snowball down the mountain already. I did not like the trade for Kolb, but the problem with our QB play, goes WAY BEYOND the QB himself. To ignore this obvious fact, would be to act as stupid as Graves to put the Cards in such sorry tackle personnel position. If we don't confront the real issue, I'm sure Graves will just allow us all to blame Kolb, we risk him doing nothing or very little to address it in the offseason, and then where will we be? It's not Kolb, it's our tackles.
Solve our tackle play, and THEN we can see what Kolb has. He may still turn out to be mediocre, or maybe even just decent but can't take us to the promised land. But right now, he doesn't even have a chance. He should have happy feet with our tackles. It's entirely legitimate to have them with those bums. It only appears he has no pocket presence, because the national idiots that write that drivel, haven't yet noticed our how consistently bad our tackle play is. His happy feet IS the presence, because quite rightly so, he has reason to think that way FIRST, and then look to throw downfield, because THAT is the position he or ANY QB the cards throw back there will be in. When he doesn't have happy feet, when he allows himself to TRY to be a normal QB, who has more than 2.0 seconds to throw, that's when he gets hit. He's damned if he does, damned if he doesn't. It's hard for even NFL QB's to hit wide open receivers when it's the 1 in 20 plays that allows him to do so. When the pressure is on him so much, when suddenly a play goes better, and he has a shot, it's like being 'too open' and missing a shot in basketball. Sadly he only gets one or two opportunities within the scope of the game, to even give him a shot. He misses those, and that's it.
As for looking off a receiver, he has no time. That's something I'm sure he'd do less of, if he had any confidence in the line. He doesn't, and he shouldn't. It makes him look worse, but that's the position the line is putting him in.
I didn't like the trade, and still don't. But I won't blame the guy for the bigger problems going on around him. It would be unfair, and counterproductive to do so. I never bought the hype in this guy. I just don't also buy all the blame he is getting either. All of his problems, can be fairly attributed to no time. Kurt had more time. Kurt also didn't have them teeing off on him. It was different for Kurt. The word is out about our OL, and the genie cannot be put back in the bottle. Kurt didn't have to deal with that. He also had better receivers. From what I'm seeing, the pressure is on Kolb within a second or so of the snap. Oh yes he has a little more time than that in total, but you know your guys are beat within a second or so of snap consistently. That is a totally different than what Kurt dealt with. It is also a whole lot more consistent. We also got to see today what we are missing in Boldin, and Warner even behind a shoddy line, which had better tackle play than this year, also had Boldin.
Kolb sucks behind this line and these tackles. I don't know besides 6 ol this season, and getting new ones in the offseason that can be done. Changing QB's will not yield better results, the tackles will still suck.
We are risking having one shot QB right now. I'd rather not have three shot QB's, because they too will have to play behind our Community College Reserve Tackles.
This is not an endorsement of Kolb, it's just a realization that when the pressure is behind our QB before he even finishes dropping back (or close to that) on a consistent basis, no QB will do well.
We need to use 6 oline, and deal with whatever that takes away from our offense the rest of the season. Hell I'd try even 7 if need be....and a rb to chip. I'd rather have a qb have a chance to throw to two receivers, than not have a chance to even drop back but have more receivers.
We simply do not have a line to be able to drop back and pass with 5 olinemen this year. That's simply a fact.
The only real judgement we can make about Kolb, is that he absolutely sucks behind a line with the worst tackles of at least this century. You can't gleam too much from that, or else you risk shooting yourself in the foot because of putting the emotion colored lenses on. Tom Brady, Peyton Manning, Dan Marino, Joe Montana, insert ANY QB in here, would suck behind a line with our tackles. Mike Vick would have to run 70 percent of the time behind our line. Our tackles suck that bad.
Our GM at the very least, and perhaps our coaches as well, deserve the blame for not recognizing this fact. I'm not for shell shocking another QB, and I think Kolb has a toughness to keep sticking his nose in there. But I'd rather not risk Rosenbach'ing him. I sure wouldn't want to expose Skelton or Bartel to it as well.
We must consistently use 6 ol, or else we risk everything snowballing out of control, if it hasn't already started that snowball down the mountain already. I did not like the trade for Kolb, but the problem with our QB play, goes WAY BEYOND the QB himself. To ignore this obvious fact, would be to act as stupid as Graves to put the Cards in such sorry tackle personnel position. If we don't confront the real issue, I'm sure Graves will just allow us all to blame Kolb, we risk him doing nothing or very little to address it in the offseason, and then where will we be? It's not Kolb, it's our tackles.
Solve our tackle play, and THEN we can see what Kolb has. He may still turn out to be mediocre, or maybe even just decent but can't take us to the promised land. But right now, he doesn't even have a chance. He should have happy feet with our tackles. It's entirely legitimate to have them with those bums. It only appears he has no pocket presence, because the national idiots that write that drivel, haven't yet noticed our how consistently bad our tackle play is. His happy feet IS the presence, because quite rightly so, he has reason to think that way FIRST, and then look to throw downfield, because THAT is the position he or ANY QB the cards throw back there will be in. When he doesn't have happy feet, when he allows himself to TRY to be a normal QB, who has more than 2.0 seconds to throw, that's when he gets hit. He's damned if he does, damned if he doesn't. It's hard for even NFL QB's to hit wide open receivers when it's the 1 in 20 plays that allows him to do so. When the pressure is on him so much, when suddenly a play goes better, and he has a shot, it's like being 'too open' and missing a shot in basketball. Sadly he only gets one or two opportunities within the scope of the game, to even give him a shot. He misses those, and that's it.
As for looking off a receiver, he has no time. That's something I'm sure he'd do less of, if he had any confidence in the line. He doesn't, and he shouldn't. It makes him look worse, but that's the position the line is putting him in.
I didn't like the trade, and still don't. But I won't blame the guy for the bigger problems going on around him. It would be unfair, and counterproductive to do so. I never bought the hype in this guy. I just don't also buy all the blame he is getting either. All of his problems, can be fairly attributed to no time. Kurt had more time. Kurt also didn't have them teeing off on him. It was different for Kurt. The word is out about our OL, and the genie cannot be put back in the bottle. Kurt didn't have to deal with that. He also had better receivers. From what I'm seeing, the pressure is on Kolb within a second or so of the snap. Oh yes he has a little more time than that in total, but you know your guys are beat within a second or so of snap consistently. That is a totally different than what Kurt dealt with. It is also a whole lot more consistent. We also got to see today what we are missing in Boldin, and Warner even behind a shoddy line, which had better tackle play than this year, also had Boldin.
Kolb sucks behind this line and these tackles. I don't know besides 6 ol this season, and getting new ones in the offseason that can be done. Changing QB's will not yield better results, the tackles will still suck.
Last edited: