make the bad men stop.....
Renz said:If Leinart expects Vince Young money then he really will be going into next year's draft.
Yup. Most recent high=profile example of this is when the Chargers drafted Eli Manning even though he vowed never to play a down for them. The Giants drafted Philip Rivers and they swapped (with some other considerations, of course, but point being, neither were signed) on draft day.Mainstreet said:do the Cardinals have the ability to trade his rights to another team or do a sign and trade?
Pariah said:Yup. Most recent high=profile example of this is when the Chargers drafted Eli Manning even though he vowed never to play a down for them. The Giants drafted Philip Rivers and they swapped (with some other considerations, of course, but point being, neither were signed) on draft day.
ajcardfan said:Oh, please, drop all the drama. Discussion is not "retaliation".
Yes, I understand the English language. I'll just wait until I hear from Leinart, his agent, or the Cardinals, when they speak it in English, that they want Young's contract. Until then, you are just guessing like everyone else.
Bobcat said:That is because you have a hard time understanding English language. What is happening is exactly what I stated. Mat and his agents want Vince young type money. Now do you understand Matt's hold out. Maybe he will settle for less, but not much less.
why are you trying to be so antagonistic??? I guess that we on this forum must agree with the few who fell that they are running this forum, when it is really run by others who have done a great job in managing this site. We all have our own opinions so please let us state them without retaliation.
BOBCAT
Shogun said:I guess I'm the only one who isn't concerned at all....?
RedRob said:Let's admit that Bobcat forecasted our current dilemma, he was lambasted when he originally predicted this happening. Bobcat, your sources might be as old as the Bills' front office; but it doesn't mean they not in the know.
D-Dogg said:Nobody would argue that Matt would WANT that. Of course he would. You don't need "sources" to guess what they might want in negotiations.
However, it is what he GETS that matters. The point of contention with Bobcat is he claims that slotting doesn't matter. The rest of us claim that it does, and his contract will be slotted. If he gets VY money, or even more money than Sims, then I'll admit I was wrong. But if Matt is slotted, then Bobcat has a LOT of apologizing to do.
Of course Matt would want VY money...he's three times the QB Young is. Problem is, he was not drafted in the same zip code.
BACH said:Check out Bruce Cooper's video report on http://www.azcentral.com/sports/cardinals/
According to him, they agree on on the length and total value of the deal, BUT not the garanteed money. The Cards are willing to give him the slotted $13M, while Leinart wants $26M like Vince Young!!!
I'm surprised! The garanteed money is always slotted, so I expected the total value to be the issue here. If this is true, I'm teaming with the front office on this one. There's no reason why the Cards have to be punished for Leinart sliding all the way down to #10. This is also a hold-out that Condon can't win. If he wants #3 garanteed money for the #10 pick, then re-entering the draft is no option since Leinart would slide even more, because the slotted garanteed money is the only that is relatively certain when dealing with rookie deals.
Mainstreet said:Thanks for the friendly information. I would be interested in this issue irregardless of the player. Unfortunately, I know more about NBA operations than NFL operations.
I must say... the spolight is on the Cardinals this upcoming season and they need to get it done with the new stadium and all.
Crazy Canuck said:I'm in general agreement with Bobcat on this one.
I think, (as I'm my own source) - that for the Leinart team the contracts signed between 4 and 9 to OT's, LB's, TE's and DB's - are largely irrelevant.
The slot they'd been seeking in between the Vince Young (5 years - 58m) at #3 and Cutler's (6 years - 48m) at #11.
My fearless prediction is 6 years at 53m.
Crazy Canuck said:I'm in general agreement with Bobcat on this one.
I think, (as I'm my own source) - that for the Leinart team the contracts signed between 4 and 9 to OT's, LB's, TE's and DB's - are largely irrelevant.
The slot they'd been seeking in between the Vince Young (5 years - 58m) at #3 and Cutler's (6 years - 48m) at #11.
My fearless prediction is 6 years at 53m.
BACH said:Check out Bruce Cooper's video report on http://www.azcentral.com/sports/cardinals/
According to him, they agree on on the length and total value of the deal, BUT not the garanteed money. The Cards are willing to give him the slotted $13M, while Leinart wants $26M like Vince Young!!!
I'm surprised! The garanteed money is always slotted, so I expected the total value to be the issue here. If this is true, I'm teaming with the front office on this one. There's no reason why the Cards have to be punished for Leinart sliding all the way down to #10. This is also a hold-out that Condon can't win. If he wants #3 garanteed money for the #10 pick, then re-entering the draft is no option since Leinart would slide even more, because the slotted garanteed money is the only that is relatively certain when dealing with rookie deals.
gusmahler said:I always thought his family wasn't "wealthy"? I remember stories about him driving some old beat up pick up truck. And that his family, while not poor, wasn't rich either. Middle class, I guess.
Bobcat said:I said that I would apologize if I am wrong, and let us leave it at that.
But on th other hand I did predict that Matt and his Agent were looking for what Vince young was getting rather than being slotted between picks 9 and 11. That was my point all along. Guy's the CBA has to make some concession when a player of his ability falls so far due to stupid Owner, and GM decisions. I.E. Tenn. Coaches wanted Matt, but got Vince and Huston got a DE rather than the best player in the country Reggie Bush. The GM was fired, ad the Owner of Tenn. got his man from Houston verses the better QB. Matt now suffering for this. I am all for the players when it comes to contracts. And if I am right D-Dogg you have a lot of apologizing to do to me and even as it stands right now you should start, cause what I stated would happen already has happened with Matt and his Agent wanted more then the slotted position would have payed out.
BOBCAT
spanky1 said:All well and good.....but what is the range of guaranteed money. Here in lies the rub. If Leinart produces to expectations, whatever contract he signs now will be renegotiated before the origional expires anyway.
Mitch said:2. Matt Leinart is making a big mistake here. Yes, everyone was surprised he slid to #10...Yes, everyone was surprised he spurned the opportunity to be the #1 pick in 2005 in favor of returning to USC. However, the I'm special and deserve special considerations posturing should not sit well with teammates and the rest of the league. Yes, the players are saying business is business...but each of them had to accept beginning salaries commensurate with the league's slotting...like Anquan Boldin having to accept a 2nd round salary despite being projected as a 1st round pick. Boldin signed, worked his ass off, peformed at a Pro Bowl level and THEN was awarded the new contract.should have been a top three pick...and THEN cash in on his second contract.