- Joined
- Feb 1, 2010
- Posts
- 11,660
- Reaction score
- 844
Ok so you are telling me that you know more about basketball than the Portland and Indiana FOs?Wow...your analysis is spot on as usual. Ask Miami and OKC, obviously the two best teams in the NBA how important a good center is.
Keep watching film though, it's really boosted your NBA acumen.
At least we won't be subjected to your Gordon/Rivers fantasies anymore, now you can focus on your 8 team, 46 player trade scenarios.
I mean while they probably gone to college and other programs to learn about this business and had experience managing in the NBA, you probably do know more while being likely a high school drop out.
Big men are ALWAYS important in the NBA. No team in the past 15 or so years have won a title without a legit big man. Why the hell do you think Hibbert was just offered the max? Why the hell do you think Brook Lopez was just offered the max? Why the hell do you think DeAndre Jordan is making big $$? Why the hell do you think a guy with arguably the lowest IQ in basketball, Javale McGee is getting offered a contract of $50M+ ?
Hibbert is of course worth the max because he already showed tremendous potential and still improving. Miami had to constantly double team and Hibbert was the main reason that Indy even won some games vs them in the series.
But yea, of course all that is wrong because you certainly know more about basketball than Neil Olshey and Kevin Pritchard
The main reason I come on the ASFNs is for the pure comedy that posters like you present man...I just wanna say thank you for that and please keep it up
Big men in the NBA will always be the most important positions. Not necessarily the Center position because many teams have won without a great center. However, most of those teams had a legit PF playing next to that center.
I would say having one or the other at either big man position is pretty damn important since those players are harder to find. It seems like guards and tweeners are a dime a dozen in every draft.