cly2tw
Registered User
- Joined
- Oct 26, 2002
- Posts
- 5,832
- Reaction score
- 0
The team that ends up with Amare will likely win the title this year.
I listened to the radio at lunch today, and both Bickley and Gambo said that reports out of Miami are that they offered Beasely, Q. Rich, filler, and both picks.
If this is a real offer, take it.
Beasely and Q can help keep us out of the lottery this year
and give us a base to develop for the future.
If they really do not like Beasely- He has some value in the open market.
Easy,move Nash so we can all get on with our basketball lives...... and so our youngsters can begin to develop their skills and roles without relying on one of the best PG's to ever play the game to get them points and easy shots because he won't be here forever.Just to chime in on LB. The dude was not shooting well with the cyst, but was nails coming off the bench before that. That being said, his injury was the best thing ever for Dragic, who has gotten a lot more playing time since LB has been out. I think LB is valuable to us, but Gentry HAS to find a way to bring LB back without reducing Dragic's time, or Dudley's, Frye's, or any of the second teams guys that have been so effective for us lately.
Easy,move Nash so we can all get on with our basketball lives...... and so our youngsters can begin to develop their skills and roles without relying on one of the best PG's to ever play the game to get them points and easy shots because he won't be here forever.
Easy,move Nash so we can all get on with our basketball lives...... and so our youngsters can begin to develop their skills and roles without relying on one of the best PG's to ever play the game to get them points and easy shots because he won't be here forever.
What exactly is having Nash playing at his current level doing for this team?.......... serving Nash, it could be argued.Wow. That would be about the dumbest thing the Suns could do at this point, as long as Nash is playing at even a fraction of his current level.
Without Nash (and with Amare) this team wins 20 games. Maybe 15, maybe 30 in a stretch. They probably beat teams like the Nets and Sacto in a 7 game series. Maybe.
According to Gambo, the deal with Beasley is that he apparently has a bad rap regarding his character... Not sure exactly what all he did to earn this reputation as a high-risk character dude, but it's there. Of course, he is only 21 years old so no doubt he has a ton of maturing to do, both on and off the court...
The other thing to consider is that if this deal with the Heat did go down, there is no guarantee that the Suns would be able to get a trade for Beasley done in time. Which means the Suns could end up with Beasley for the remainder of the season, giving them 2 months or so to see what he really is all about. Who knows, maybe he's not the bad guy some people think he is...
I listened to the radio at lunch today, and both Bickley and Gambo said that reports out of Miami are that they offered Beasely, Q. Rich, filler, and both picks.
If this is a real offer, take it.
Beasely and Q can help keep us out of the lottery this year
and give us a base to develop for the future.
If they really do not like Beasely- He has some value in the open market.
Beasley and 2 picks? Wow, sign me up. I'm in the don't trade Amare camp, but that is too good to be true.
The fact that this team sucks without Nash isn't because Nash makes everyone's jobs easier. It's because most of the players besides Nash simply aren't very good.
If this is true, then it suggests that teams are indeed not offering anything of value for Amare, because they expect the Suns to just give away Amare the same way they did with Shaq and others. They think that Sarver is desperate enough to save a few bucks that he will take any deal offered to him as long as it reduces the Suns' payroll.The Miami Heat have not offered Michael Beasley or either of their two first-round picks in exchange for Amare Stoudemire, according to sources.
"I'm not sure Miami is willing to pay the price for Amare," a Suns source told ESPN.com. "We have to get something for him. We're not giving him away. If Miami gets serious, then I think they would get him. But right now, they are not showing they're serious."
What exactly is having Nash playing at his current level doing for this team?.......... serving Nash, it could be argued.
Apparently you just decided to read: Move Nash.
I'm a believer in the fact that young players need to be "thrown into the fire" so to speak,in order to grow. Being mentored and supported by great players is also a good thing....initially.
I wonder what kind of a player Barbosa would be today if he were starting alongside Dragic if Nash had left a year or two ago? Where would Dragic be if Nash had left last summer?
Point is, having Dragic(and others) play behind Nash for another 2-3 yrs would be a mistake IMO.
These aren't NFL QB's that should be groomed long term IMO.
Just a different perspective.
Lets say that Nash is still playing here when he's 40(because he's still playing well). At what point does it STOP becoming HIS TEAM?
Just heard a report on Gambo & Ash that Amare and his agent fully expect a trade to be announced within the next 12 hours. Either Cavs or Heat... no other details...
i don't know if anyone's been paying attention to the other goings-on in the nba, but if the rockets are going to net jordan hill, a swap of firsts with the knicks this year, and possibly another knicks first round pick in future, all for an injured expiring mcgrady, how are we getting hosed so badly? SURELY an all-star PF should net more than that!!! i mean, we have more bargaining power in that we don't NEED to move amare (i don't think he opts out this year) whereas the rockets NEED to move mcgrady or lose whatever value he has at the end of the season. in other words, we should be in a position of bargaining power strength compared to the rockets, and yet they're going to net more??? dejesus H christ on a popsicle stick!
i don't know if anyone's been paying attention to the other goings-on in the nba, but if the rockets are going to net jordan hill, a swap of firsts with the knicks this year, and possibly another knicks first round pick in future, all for an injured expiring mcgrady, how are we getting hosed so badly? SURELY an all-star PF should net more than that!!! i mean, we have more bargaining power in that we don't NEED to move amare (i don't think he opts out this year) whereas the rockets NEED to move mcgrady or lose whatever value he has at the end of the season. in other words, we should be in a position of bargaining power strength compared to the rockets, and yet they're going to net more??? dejesus H christ on a popsicle stick!
What makes you so sure Amare doesn't opt out?? Sure, his final year pays him a handsome sum, but what happens after that?? He wants a long-term deal, not just a one year Max, or close to Max deal. My bet is that he does walk if we can't work out a trade...
Mike D'antoni doesn't like rookies....i don't know if anyone's been paying attention to the other goings-on in the nba, but if the rockets are going to net jordan hill, a swap of firsts with the knicks this year, and possibly another knicks first round pick in future, all for an injured expiring mcgrady, how are we getting hosed so badly?
WeakIt's a myth that Nash is inhibiting the development of other players. As long as they are getting minutes, they have plenty of opportunity to work on all the in-game skills they want. The main thing Nash does is free his teammates from the burden of having to create their own shots, but most of them will never be able to do that anyway, and the others can hone those skills when Nash is on the bench or not heavily involved in the play.
The fact that this team sucks without Nash isn't because Nash makes everyone's jobs easier. It's because most of the players besides Nash simply aren't very good.
Mike D'antoni doesn't like rookies....
Too Soon?
According to RealGM, the Cavs are trading for Jamison.