- Joined
- May 14, 2002
- Posts
- 87,700
- Reaction score
- 39,012
Here’s what really bothers me about the NCAA. If Miller got caught running a dirty enough program to actually get punished, it’s crap for the school to solely get punished, while the coach gets away scot-free to move on without consequence.
Calipari has gotten away with it consistently, just moving on after killing programs. Now, maybe that’s just the price programs are willing to pay to win, but if the NCAA ever really wants to get serious about stopping this, the coaches have to be punished as well in some form.
Either that or just start paying the kids already.
He wouldn't. If Miller did what ESPN said he did, he'd not only get a show cause, he'd get an outright ban for a number of years. If he's just guilty of leading a program that had 2 coaches steering players to agents and probably 2 ineligible players and maybe 4 in the last seasons, he might get a show cause.
To be clear, I don't believe Pitt and Miller is real, UCLA is allegedly putting off a coaching search this year out of fear they might hire someone who is later revealed in the FBI story. There's no way a school is going to hire a coach that heads up a program front and center in the FBi story, and was also accused of what the ESPN story said. Even if he's completely innocent, Pitt wouldn't hire him until tapes came out and cleared him.
My guess is either the rumor is made up, or Miller and his agent are floating the rumor to try and make it seem he's completely innocent and he's so confident, he's even looking at other jobs.
My guess is the rumor is largely made up