Your missing the “keep citing and re typing” aspect....
I get it bring them up once or twice hell even 3 times...
But each of them have literally typed out that entire list of accomplishments from pre school to college on numerous occasions over and over.... We’ve all seen them many times over. It’s not new and different people in this debate. How many times do you think you must try and pound it into our heads.
It didn’t change our mind when the Charger fan did it multiple occasions. It didn’t change our mind when Crimson did it multiples of times. Now Jones is joining the fray feeling the need to list every single accomplishment since the day he was born.
Lol
haha Shane. I'd like to think that I don't spam out repetitive posts. Yes, I do reference Murray's college stats pretty frequently, but I've tried to approach changing your mind from a few different angles:
1. Citing his college statistical success
2. Requesting that you observing his in game performance.
3. Setting up a correlation between Murray and Mayfield
4. Emphasizing his physical advantages (i.e arm strength & speed)
5. Conceding his physical limitations, but citing his unicorn-like skill set that will allow him to beat the odds ala Wilson.
You, on the other hand, seem to really, really focus on his physical limitations, particularly his height.
Which is fine, but not compelling. The problem with your side of the Murray debate is that there is more evidence that he will be successful in the NFL than there is not. By quite a significant margin I'm afraid sir (at least in my humble estimation).
I think your best hope, and the most logical argument for not drafting Murray, as previously championed by TJ and Krangthebrain, is that taking Bosa and sticking with Rosen is safer than quitting on Rosen,
and also passing on a (potential) defensive corner-piece . Even I admit that we would gambling a fair amount on Murray in that case.