QuebecCard
ASFN Addict
I haven't heard it - pure speculation and hope.
I have nothing against VJ but we can't stop the run and we are not using our top 2 picks effectively. That has to change.
Yes...
Answer: Better NT and experience.
I haven't heard it - pure speculation and hope.
I have nothing against VJ but we can't stop the run and we are not using our top 2 picks effectively. That has to change.
I guess the bright side is that no one's been extended.Cards are keeping their entire coaching staff. They would have already made moves by now. I'm sure they are all in Mobile at the Senior Bowl. Bottom line we are stuck with Keim, KK & VJ for the 2022 season.
Actually, that is a good point and hopefully they will wait till the FULL 2022 season is over.I guess the bright side is that no one's been extended.
Yet.
M Bidwill confirming the actual coaching staff is not because he trust them but because he doesn't want to pay another oneActually, that is a good point and hopefully they will wait till the FULL 2022 season is over.
Yes let's just turn everything over to the government when somebody dies. Just like the cowboy movies where they steal the boots off of the dead guy. This (woke) BS is rapidly getting out of hand.If you want to talk about lack of merit look at many of the owners
What did Michael Bidwill do to deserve to be President/Owner? What about Dean Spanos? Mark Davis? The McCaskey’s ? Maras? Rooneys? Haslams? Kroenke? Browns? Yorks?
Give?Yeah its time to make some changes not just on the field and giving the ownership to some black dudes
I hope it happens with the Cardinals
lots of imagination on this boardWell, how about this: Firing VJ has been nothing more than a figment of the imagination of some fans.
SellingGive?
I get it. But if you were an owner would it be fair to you to be made to hire someone you didn’t want to meet a league ratio?You’re right. Except when 97% of the owners of a monopoly all choose white. Then it becomes a discriminatory issue.
So you go through the motion of remaining interviews even though in you heart the second candidate you interviewed is the person you want. Basically wasting your time but following protocol.Except that's not the reality in any company in America. I literally can't promise a job to someone as a senior exec without interviewing every candidate
The second half of your comment is an immaterial argument because white people aren’t being excluded from playing simply due to the fact they are white.I get it. But if you were an owner would it be fair to you to be made to hire someone you didn’t want to meet a league ratio?
Imagine you were an owner and you just fired your head coach. When looking to replace him you have an opportunity to hire Sean Payton. However to meet the league ratio you’d be forced to hire Byron Leftwich instead of Payton?
I understand the situation. But how can you MAKE an owner hire somebody based on color.
Imagine if we held rosters to that standard. Sorry you have to cut your all pro Black RB because there aren’t enough white RB’s?
And if black people are told to get in the back of the line sucks for them? They didn’t get there due to bad luck.In the real world we are all standing in the cheese line waiting our turn. Sometimes the cheese runs out before you get to the front of the line. In reality there is no solution to this situation. Sometimes luck is on your side and sometimes it isn't. Life isn't fair and you can't make it so no matter how hard you try.
So it’s fair that a sport that has a a minority that represents 13% of society holds 70% of the jobs?That’s not the right way to view it. That’s like saying a company isn’t racist because it’s 70% black even though there’s not a single black person at a managerial level or higher.
So you go through the motion of remaining interviews even though in you heart the second candidate you interviewed is the person you want. Basically wasting your time but following protocol.
I remember hearing a little about the Rooney rule was giving minorities an opportunity to experience of the interview process. Nowhere was it a gaurantee to be hired.
Want to level the field? You shouldn’t even be allowed to see the person you are interviewing. The person voice being considered should be altered. Now you remove all bias.
Flores wasn't at the back of the line when he was hired in Miami so I guess the white guys can sue tooAnd if black people are told to get in the back of the line sucks for them? They didn’t get there due to bad luck.
And we wonder how racism persists today . . . no we don’t.
Want to level the field? You shouldn’t even be allowed to see the person you are interviewing. The person voice being considered should be altered. Now you remove all bias.
We see the problem but how do you solve it?First literally NONE of us are qualified to say whether Daboll is a more qualified hire. None of us were privy to their respective pitches. We don’t know what their proposed plans were, who they listed as potential staff, etc.
Second the issue isn’t that the NFL isn’t hiring less talented black coaches, unless it’s your contention that black coaches are just by definition less talented. I don’t think that’s what you believe. The issue is with 1/32 being black they’re obviously not hiring the talented ones, period. That’s a problem, no?
Of course you would and should. But being human somewhere along the interview process there is a good chance that someone would wow you.That would be incredibly poor management style. If you select to interview x number of people, they are all "Good candidates". That is what prescreening is for.
To find the best person for the job, I have to interview each person and weigh their strengths and weaknesses at the end of the interview process.
Funny how the front of the line is all whiteIn the real world we are all standing in the cheese line waiting our turn. Sometimes the cheese runs out before you get to the front of the line. In reality there is no solution to this situation. Sometimes luck is on your side and sometimes it isn't. Life isn't fair and you can't make it so no matter how hard you try.
Imagine you are Michael Bidwill and you have just fired Steve Wilks and have an opportunity to hire Byron Leftwich, Eric Bienemy(sp), Jim Caldwell, Todd Bowles, etc. and picked someone like…Kliff Kingsbury? And the Cards are one of the better diverse hiring organizations around. There are any number of black coaches who seem to have better resumes than the ones hired. I don’t know if the owners care or will care as long as the $$$$$ keep rolling in. It all rests in the hands of the owners until someone mentions lifting their exemption status or forcibly legislates their compliance with some arbitrary quota (which won’t happen).I get it. But if you were an owner would it be fair to you to be made to hire someone you didn’t want to meet a league ratio?
Imagine you were an owner and you just fired your head coach. When looking to replace him you have an opportunity to hire Sean Payton. However to meet the league ratio you’d be forced to hire Byron Leftwich instead of Payton?
I understand the situation. But how can you MAKE an owner hire somebody based on color.
Imagine if we held rosters to that standard. Sorry you have to cut your all pro Black RB because there aren’t enough white RB’s?
He was hired to lose and when he won he was fired. He was hired as the guy most likely to lose. That makes sense to you?Flores wasn't at the back of the line when he was hired in Miami so I guess the white guys can sue too
No doubt. It’s a major slap in the face. But if Flores was white, would this be a story?This is about the fact that BB accidentally told Flores that Dabol had been hired before he had a chance to interview. THAT is BULL****. if I was a Giants fan, I would be pissed off. What if Flores would have been a great coach? What if Dabol was handed the job prematurely?
Then it’s not a league problem, it’s an owner problem, no?He was hired to lose and when he won he was fired. He was hired as the guy most likely to lose. That makes sense to you?