- Joined
- Aug 19, 2005
- Posts
- 46,247
- Reaction score
- 11,851
No Curry, no deal. That's all.
lol
No Curry, no deal. That's all.
GS can still pull out of this deal as Curry would fit into their system quite well
When was the last 'big man' the Warriors had? Manute Bol?
If 'into their system' you mean perimeter focus and no defense, you are absolutely right.
They are a run and gun offense, much like the "old" Suns. Curry has tremendous court vision and passing abilities. So yes, he would fit in quite well
I thought he was talking about Golden State???
Joe Smith, Chris Webber, Erick Dampier, Adonal Foyle?
Joe Smith, Chris Webber, Erick Dampier, Adonal Foyle?
Stop!!!! Too much mediocrity.Andres Biedrins?
Troy Murphy?
I don't believe it. The Suns FO wouldn't have started cheering unless they already thought Curry was theirs.Listening to Chris Brussard on ESPN it actually sounds like the Suns were the team that changed the Dynamic of the deal. Brussard said a deal was in place to have Amare traded for Wright, Biedrins, and Bellinelli, but when Curry was available and the Warriors drafted him, the Suns started asking for Curry.
http://espn.go.com/
I don't believe it. The Suns FO wouldn't have started cheering unless they already thought Curry was theirs.
Listening to Chris Brussard on ESPN it actually sounds like the Suns were the team that changed the Dynamic of the deal. Brussard said a deal was in place to have Amare traded for Wright, Biedrins, and Bellinelli, but when Curry was available and the Warriors drafted him, the Suns started asking for Curry.
http://espn.go.com/
Listening to Chris Brussard on ESPN it actually sounds like the Suns were the team that changed the Dynamic of the deal. Brussard said a deal was in place to have Amare traded for Wright, Biedrins, and Bellinelli, but when Curry was available and the Warriors drafted him, the Suns started asking for Curry.
http://espn.go.com/
From Bucher (via Twitter)...
@memovalencia Curry is coming + Biedrins is the best defensive big man Nash's ever had. Good P&Rer, too. Phx is doing the right thing.
Big fan but I am a casual fan concerning all the roster and cap rules and implications. Say the trade goes through, after saving money by trading Amare, the assumed cutting of Pavlovic, Saving money by trading Shaq, Then add back in the contracts of Curry, Clark, and the 2nd rounder. What is the money situation look like with Wallace vs. paying him off. What I am getting at is, is the difference between the two a big difference and could we conceivably ask him to see what are med staff and trainers can do with him and try to get one more good year out of him?